Latest Breaking News

riversedge

(81,983 posts) Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:39 PM 2 hrs ago

'I Caution Lindsey': JD Vance Goes After Sen. Graham By Name On Live TV

Source: crooksandliars.com

Vice President JD Vance took a shot at one of President Donald Trump's closest allies on live television Monday.

By David Edwards — June 16, 2026

..............

Vance called out Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and Trump's regular golfing partner, by name on ABC's Good Morning America — telling him to stop doubting the newly signed U.S.-Iran deal.

"'I am somewhat concerned that Iran's view of the agreement seems different than what the American negotiating team is claiming,'" host George Stephanopoulos said, reading from Graham's post on X. "Is that true?"

"No, George. It's not true," Vance shot back. "And I'd caution Lindsey Graham and anybody else not to believe the hardliner propaganda in Iran, but to believe what's actually in the agreement."

...................
Graham had been skeptical of the Iran negotiations for months. As recently as April, he warned the ceasefire negotiating document had "troubling aspects" and specifically called on Vance to answer for it before Congress.

Read more: https://crooksandliars.com/2026/06/i-caution-lindsey-jd-vance-goes-after-sen

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'I Caution Lindsey': JD Vance Goes After Sen. Graham By Name On Live TV (Original Post) riversedge 2 hrs ago OP

Has Graham responed?................. Lovie777 2 hrs ago #1

"Believe what is actually in the agreement". So what is in the agreement? That is Super Delta Top Secret. Midnight Writer 2 hrs ago #2

Exactly. What is in the agreement? The administration is demanding blind obedience Deuxcents 2 hrs ago #5

JD might pummel Graham with a pillow... wcmagumba 2 hrs ago #3

Ha ha! Roy Rolling 1 hr ago #8

Graham is alledgedly a retired JAG-OFF. pfitz59 2 hrs ago #4

He does.............. Lovie777 2 hrs ago #6

Gotta keep Traildogbob 1 hr ago #7

We'd love to believe what's actually in the agreement. Too bad nobody can see it. pat_k 1 hr ago #9

Lovie777

(24,247 posts)

1. Has Graham responed?.................

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:40 PM

2 hrs ago

C H I C K E N

Midnight Writer

(25,939 posts)

2. "Believe what is actually in the agreement". So what is in the agreement? That is Super Delta Top Secret.

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:43 PM

2 hrs ago

Deuxcents

(28,048 posts)

5. Exactly. What is in the agreement? The administration is demanding blind obedience

Reply to Midnight Writer (Reply #2)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:45 PM

2 hrs ago

wcmagumba

(6,836 posts)

3. JD might pummel Graham with a pillow...

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:44 PM

2 hrs ago

Roy Rolling

(7,741 posts)

8. Ha ha!

Reply to wcmagumba (Reply #3)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:02 PM

1 hr ago

I was thinking of this. Where’s the Spanish Inquisition when they’re really needed?

And can they do couches? if you know what I mean, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more.

pfitz59

(13,040 posts)

4. Graham is alledgedly a retired JAG-OFF.

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:45 PM

2 hrs ago

He should know Hegseth and Trump are breaking all sorts of laws.

Lovie777

(24,247 posts)

6. He does..............

Reply to pfitz59 (Reply #4)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 04:57 PM

2 hrs ago

he don't care, especially about the US, it's military nor her people.

Traildogbob

(13,278 posts)

7. Gotta keep

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:01 PM

1 hr ago

His sexual history hidden with the Epstein gang.
Not much he can do, he does not wanna go back to “Racking balls till the sun comes up”, for a living.
Hell he can live off the gubment high on the hog with his entitlements.

pat_k

(14,381 posts)

9. We'd love to believe what's actually in the agreement. Too bad nobody can see it.

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Jun 16, 2026, 05:34 PM

1 hr ago

And frankly, I won't even trust it when we do see it. It would have to include some sort of binding statement by all parties that no additional conditions exist and that nothing has been excluded from the document on "national security" or other grounds.

Reply to this discussion