Georgia town's novel strategy to fight ICE jail plan impresses legal experts
Source: The Guardian
A small Georgia towns federal lawsuit opposing the Trump administrations plans to turn a warehouse into one of the largest immigration detention centers in the US has the potential to create a wide impact as it uses novel legal arguments, experts said.
The town of Social Circles complaint goes further than other recently filed lawsuits around the same issues, which assert that the US federal government has not carried out environmental impact assessments for proposed detention centers, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (Nepa).
The towns lawsuit goes on to allege that the homeland security department and ICE have also violated the federal Administrative Procedures Act (APA) which requires reasoned decision-making by federal agencies, including consideration of adversely affected interests and any reasonable alternatives, according to the complaint.
Additionally, the complaint asserts that locating what ICE has called megacenters in the small town of about 5,000 residents would violate Georgias public nuisance law meaning it would harm their health, safety, and wellbeing.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/31/georgia-ice-detention-center-social-circle
Bayard
(30,438 posts)They forgot--Just because it sucks. Its unreal how they think they can just come in and take over small towns like this. Maybe they think paying twice what a building is worth should make up for it.
eppur_se_muova
(42,625 posts)so you know Trmp just has to stick a finger in their eye, with this prison for nonwhite people.
orleans
(37,269 posts)rustbeltvoice
(497 posts)Raine1967
(11,698 posts)The video is 18 minutes, but it's worth it.
they think small towns won't push back.
zanana1
(6,554 posts)(Not in my backyard). I have little sympathy for people who voted for this cretin and are now facing the consequences.
blue_jay
(298 posts)Too bad so much effort has to go into stopping what essentially may have at least partially just been a money-laundering attempt at a grift by one of his unscrupulous appointees.
dickthegrouch
(4,693 posts)The whole idea of detention, and then deportation to inhumane locations is anathema to the laws that are being promulgated as the reason for said consequences.
Very few of the incarcerated people have commited any criminal offense.
They had made their locations known to ICE as required.
They were attending immigration interviews.
They had obtained TINs to pay unrecoverable SSA and medicare deductions, plus local and federal taxes.
They were paying rent (or mortgages) in their houses.
The whole country is actually better off leaving them where they were. Employes, landlords, family, and the immigrant would all be better off. Giving them 30 days notice of a change in status, so they could arrange their affairs, would be far more humane, than abrupt abduction and disappearance.
Deminpenn
(17,605 posts)That's something every municipality no matter how small can do.