Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,716 posts)
Mon May 25, 2026, 03:04 AM May 25

Cory Booker says Democrats are 'desperate' for fresh leaders

Source: USA Today

Updated May 24, 2026, 3:38 p.m. ET


The midterm elections are less than six months away, and one Democratic senator is sounding the alarm on the party’s leadership and vision for the future. Speaking to Jake Tapper on CNN’s "State of the Union" Sunday, May 24, Sen. Cory Booker, D-New Jersey, said the party "desperately needs new leadership," days after the Democratic National Committee released its much-anticipated autopsy of the 2024 election.

"We need to focus on the people, and the Democratic Party desperately needs new leadership, and that's what's exciting me about this cycle," Booker said. "It's not only new leaders emerging, but a new vision for our party."

New leaders vs. new leadership?

Booker pointed to three Democrats who he thinks represent the future of the party –– Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia, Texas Senate hopeful James Talarico and Roy Cooper, the former governor of North Carolina and current Senate candidate.

"People are suffering, people are hurting, and they're going to support the leaders," Booker said. "And I'm seeing this in Talarico, in Ossoff, in Cooper in North Carolina, that those leaders are stepping up and saying, 'I don't give a damn about parties. I care about people.' You cannot lead the people if they don't trust you, and that's what's lacking right now with the party apparatus."

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/05/24/cory-booker-democrats-ossoff-talarico-cooper/90244099007/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cory Booker says Democrats are 'desperate' for fresh leaders (Original Post) BumRushDaShow May 25 OP
AOC, Omar, Stansbury, Warnock, Kat Abughazaleh LuvLoogie May 25 #1
I'm so glad you said 'Stansbury.' duhneece May 25 #11
Jasmine Crocket is a great one. LuvLoogie 5 hrs ago #16
both words are in short supply: fresh and leadership Tetrachloride May 25 #2
so he does not include himself as leadership lol msongs May 25 #3
I agree with him there. travelingthrulife May 25 #8
I think it was savvy to NOT name himself cause then the whole thing could've come off as bragging AZJonnie May 25 #9
Doug Jones in Alabama AverageOldGuy May 25 #4
I wonder how different things would be Polybius May 25 #6
"Desperate" Democrats .... geesh...the establishment continues to douse the fire of the increasing progressive base... OhioBack2Blue May 25 #5
"the establishment continues to douse the fire of the increasing progressive base..." BumRushDaShow May 25 #7
The establishment has played "nice" for 25 years DemocracyForever May 25 #10
"The establishment" is an overly-broad term BumRushDaShow May 25 #12
I was referring in particular to the federal level DemocracyForever Tuesday #13
As an example, it's what is going on here in Philly BumRushDaShow Tuesday #14
If dems win the Senate back DemocracyForever Wednesday #15
I was desperate for fresh leaders about 19 years ago. I was super excited when the Democrats finally won the House back Midwestern Democrat 5 hrs ago #17
I'm looking at Chris Murphy. Emile 5 hrs ago #18

LuvLoogie

(8,962 posts)
1. AOC, Omar, Stansbury, Warnock, Kat Abughazaleh
Mon May 25, 2026, 03:13 AM
May 25

I want to see Kat get in office or become active in the party nationally.

duhneece

(4,531 posts)
11. I'm so glad you said 'Stansbury.'
Mon May 25, 2026, 12:31 PM
May 25

Husband and I always talk about our top 3…
AOC, Jasmine Crockett and Melanie Stansbury.

LuvLoogie

(8,962 posts)
16. Jasmine Crocket is a great one.
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 08:56 AM
5 hrs ago

We have some good ones that could really take our party forward.

There's a veteran I've always liked as well. Patty Murray. She's a solid, no frills, serious person. A true anchor in the Senate. I think she would have made a good Senate Leader if she had wanted it.

AZJonnie

(4,117 posts)
9. I think it was savvy to NOT name himself cause then the whole thing could've come off as bragging
Mon May 25, 2026, 11:05 AM
May 25

Somehow IQ47 being a nonstop braggart doesn't seem to hurt him, but we all know how he lives under a completely different standard than any Democrat when it comes to treatment by the media.

AverageOldGuy

(4,240 posts)
4. Doug Jones in Alabama
Mon May 25, 2026, 05:46 AM
May 25

If Biden had appointed Jones as Atty General instead of that senile old what's-his-name, the whole world would be different.

Polybius

(22,173 posts)
6. I wonder how different things would be
Mon May 25, 2026, 09:00 AM
May 25

If Doug Jones put Trump in jail, does Biden still initially run for reelection? Remember, he said that he ran for reelection because he thought that he was the only person who can beat Trump.

Who wins on the Republican side? DeSantis? Would he face? Harris? Ahh, so many hypothetical questions...

OhioBack2Blue

(212 posts)
5. "Desperate" Democrats .... geesh...the establishment continues to douse the fire of the increasing progressive base...
Mon May 25, 2026, 08:17 AM
May 25

Republicans are going to lose their asses and so out comes stuff like this from their friends the Dems, who much prefer their meaner, older big brother stay in power doing the dirty work.

Ossoff, Talerico, and Cooper.... Why not just name Sherrod Brown or Mark Kelly, while he is at it?

Establishment, Establishment, Establishment - supply side economics, cruelty, Ayn Rand........something....something...

His whole policy stance, described as "market friendly" nibbles around the edges while leaving the corporate raiding of the middle class, racism, sexism, and hate in place. Baby bonds? Seriously? And for the childless seniors eating cat food? Pfft!

No. Hell no.

BumRushDaShow

(172,716 posts)
7. "the establishment continues to douse the fire of the increasing progressive base..."
Mon May 25, 2026, 09:59 AM
May 25

It's not being "doused". It's been going full throttle from the "bottom up". It's been happening here in Philly for awhile.

I.e. everyone has seen our D.A. Larry Krasner, who hails from the progressive side of the party and is in his 3rd term. And over 2 election cycles, except for a lone GOP Council member, Republicans have been completely removed from our 17-member City Council -notably from the 7 "At Large" seats, where there is a requirement for at least 2 seats set aside for a "minority party", that until recently was the GOP, but has been supplanted with the "Working Families Party", who won both "minority party" seats.

And now, less than a week ago, my own soon-to-be member of Congress, Chris Rabb, hails from the Bernie/AOC wing. He'll join Sunmer Lee (also a progressive and improbable during the 2022 election), hailing from the Pittsburgh area, and part of the PA delegation.

DemocracyForever

(238 posts)
10. The establishment has played "nice" for 25 years
Mon May 25, 2026, 12:00 PM
May 25

That strategy has brought our country to the brink of becoming a fascist dictatorship. To say it's time for a leadership change is an understatement beyond words. Bravo to Senator Booker for raising this important issue.

BumRushDaShow

(172,716 posts)
12. "The establishment" is an overly-broad term
Mon May 25, 2026, 02:09 PM
May 25

but is something that has been in existence since parties have existed centuries ago. It's all local fiefdoms that might interact with the state and national fiefdoms, to wield power that they believe will benefit party members, and hopefully society as a whole.

But the bigger issue is how to deal with "local/regional" concerns because there is no cookie cutter solution. That is why the struggle goes on and will continue that way for the foreseeable future, because there is no monolith of beliefs.

DemocracyForever

(238 posts)
13. I was referring in particular to the federal level
Tue May 26, 2026, 01:24 PM
Tuesday

I've had many years of experience working in the political arena so I'm not a novice at this. There's clearly an effort at the Congressional level, particularly in the Senate to block younger leaders from taking their rightful place in leadership who want to take a much more aggressive stance than the leadership that's currently there.

BumRushDaShow

(172,716 posts)
14. As an example, it's what is going on here in Philly
Tue May 26, 2026, 02:13 PM
Tuesday

with our election last week and its message about "change".

I found this article early this morning (published last week after the primary) -
District Attorney Larry Krasner calls on longtime chair of Philly Democrats to step down

Krasner, a strong progressive, is referencing Bob Brady, former Congressman here in Philly and ancient head of the party here for the past 40 years. He is LONG PAST needing to go. He should have been gone 30 years ago. He was integral in the fuck-up here associated with the 2024 election.

The "federal" (Congressional) primary here last week (that had some other positions on the ballot) was instructive as to where we are going.

The mayor went with the "establishment" candidate (Sharif Street whose father was mayor in the past), the member of Congress whose seat was contested (Dwight Evans, who is my Congressman, and whose seat is being replaced) went with Ala Stanford (who was never in elected office but had been an activist during COVID and I think was serving in the Gov. Shapiro's administration), and the progressive folks (including AOC and Bernie, etc) went with the ultimate winner - Chris Rabb (who was originally my state Rep. just as they redrew the lines, so I have someone else).

So there is rumbling going on where it should happen - BOTTOM UP. That will start to force changes at the top.

And as to this -

There's clearly an effort at the Congressional level, particularly in the Senate to block younger leaders from taking their rightful place in leadership


Take note that the Constitutional requirements for the Senate mean an "older" candidate right off the bat. The Constitution has a minimum age of "30" for Senators versus "25" for the House - https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei

Article I

(snip)

Section 2.

The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states, and the electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature.

No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five years, and been seven years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state in which he shall be chosen.

(snip)

Section 3.

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote.

Immediately after they shall be assembled in consequence of the first election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three classes. The seats of the Senators of the first class shall be vacated at the expiration of the second year, of the second class at the expiration of the fourth year, and the third class at the expiration of the sixth year, so that one third may be chosen every second year; and if vacancies happen by resignation, or otherwise, during the recess of the legislature of any state, the executive thereof may make temporary appointments until the next meeting of the legislature, which shall then fill such vacancies.

No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty years,
and been nine years a citizen of the United States and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state for which he shall be chosen.

(snip)


I think the youngest Senator is Sarah McBride, who will be 36 this August and was 35 when first elected last year. The 2nd youngest is Jon Ossoff (he turned 39 this past February and was 33 when elected in 2020). So when it comes to "leadership" opportunities, it may take some time to move the WWII babies and older boomers out, but I think it's starting to happen. If anything, it's happening faster in the House (as there are more in there).

DemocracyForever

(238 posts)
15. If dems win the Senate back
Wed May 27, 2026, 01:23 PM
Wednesday

I think we'll see more change like in progressive Senator Chris Van Hollen challenging "play nice" Schumer for Majority leader. I certainly hope so. The grass roots are angry and want leaders who will stand up and fight.

Midwestern Democrat

(1,036 posts)
17. I was desperate for fresh leaders about 19 years ago. I was super excited when the Democrats finally won the House back
Tue Jun 2, 2026, 09:19 AM
5 hrs ago

in 2006 after 12 long years in the minority but about six months into 2007 .... I realized that we were not going to keep the House for very long.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cory Booker says Democrat...