Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,716 posts)
Tue May 19, 2026, 10:13 AM May 19

Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision

Source: AP

Updated 10:46 PM EDT, May 18, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said Monday that the Supreme Court risks being seen as political in the wake of a major voting rights decision.

She spoke after writing a solo dissent from the court’s decision allowing Louisiana to move quickly to use new maps after the court’s conservative majority struck down a majority-Black district and weakened the Voting Rights Act.

“Public confidence is really all the judiciary has,” she said at a talk before the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C. “Everyone believes the court system is outside the political sphere. I think that means it’s incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence,” she said.

Polling has shown public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and Chief Justice John Roberts has separately bemoaned a perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-voting-rights-justice-jackson-d9971fd19f7a63c841e7890b89e104f6

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision (Original Post) BumRushDaShow May 19 OP
RISKS??? Lokee11 May 19 #1
Did she really use the word "risks?" Festivito May 19 #21
Exactly my post! BidenRocks May 19 #22
In her defense... BaronChocula May 19 #23
That line needs to be crossed more frequently. travelingthrulife May 19 #32
Understatement of the year... sop May 19 #2
Thats rather mild considering how it looks to outsiders. Srkdqltr May 19 #3
No shit Ketanji Brown Jackson suegeo May 19 #4
Me too. That was a major nail in the coffin. Amaryllis May 19 #16
Political Whip-poor-will May 19 #5
It already is political. SamuelAdams May 19 #6
Ya think? Ocelot II May 19 #7
In other news: water is wet, grass is green... NT mwooldri May 19 #8
Oh really. nt doc03 May 19 #9
Does she remember Roe? TBF May 19 #10
I feel so bad for Justice Jackson, she never deserved to be thrown in with THEM! FakeNoose May 19 #11
Risks being seen?????? Quanto Magnus May 19 #12
WTaF, Risks!?!?!? BradBo May 19 #13
Sorry, Ketanji. It's a foregone conclusion. Baitball Blogger May 19 #14
Risks being seen, my ass, it is political. republianmushroom May 19 #15
R I S K S ???????????????????????? Historic NY May 19 #17
No risk about it at all. ananda May 19 #18
"Risks" ? "Seen" ? C Moon May 19 #19
Sooner. Gore v Bush. nt BWdem4life May 19 #28
Exactly what I was thinking. Karma13612 May 19 #29
Well, at least she seems 'concerned'. Talitha May 19 #20
Of course it's obvious; but I tend to agree w poster Baronchocula that she's being. .. electric_blue68 May 19 #24
That's tippy-toeing around the issue already in everyone's face mdbl May 19 #25
Risks??? That's so 1999 awesomerwb1 May 19 #26
Hitler risked looking like a bad guy. Klarkashton May 19 #27
That ship has sailed, Justice Brown Jackson choie May 19 #30
call me in 2001. pansypoo53219 May 19 #31
It's been seen like that since Bush v. Gore sakabatou May 19 #33

Festivito

(13,932 posts)
21. Did she really use the word "risks?"
Tue May 19, 2026, 12:39 PM
May 19

I know it's in the article but I almost can't believe that she actually said it.

BaronChocula

(4,817 posts)
23. In her defense...
Tue May 19, 2026, 01:09 PM
May 19

Though it sounds like she's mitigating to the point of neutrality, she's crossing a line that doesn't get crossed at the SC. As a matter of their own tradition, they don't say things about each other that are obvious to the rest of us. They may have it out in wordy decisions, but they don't typically call each other out publicly. She opened a can of worms in what seems like a plainly obvious statement.

FakeNoose

(42,607 posts)
11. I feel so bad for Justice Jackson, she never deserved to be thrown in with THEM!
Tue May 19, 2026, 11:07 AM
May 19

Our U.S. Constitution used to be the model for all countries to follow if they wanted true Democracy.
Chump and the Project 2025 group have besmirched and destroyed all of it, including our SCOTUS.

C Moon

(13,769 posts)
19. "Risks" ? "Seen" ?
Tue May 19, 2026, 12:24 PM
May 19

The rest of us have seen this for a more than a decade. If no sooner, at least with the screw up of President Obama’s swearing in.

electric_blue68

(27,445 posts)
24. Of course it's obvious; but I tend to agree w poster Baronchocula that she's being. ..
Tue May 19, 2026, 01:20 PM
May 19

mild mannered bc in public they rarely speak out against each other - while voicing their opinions on matters in their dissent.

I'm guessing she might be fuming, and hottified inside!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ketanji Brown Jackson say...