Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,141 posts)
Sat May 16, 2026, 02:30 PM 16 hrs ago

SCOTUS Justice Refuses to Recuse Himself Over 'Conflict of Interest'

Source: Daily Beast

Updated May 16 2026 4:10AM EDT
Published May 15 2026 6:20PM EDT


Conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has rebuffed calls to recuse himself from a major looming decision. A coalition of liberal groups asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to look into Alito’s involvement in the case, which involves energy companies ExxonMobil and Suncor Energy as they look to throw out a Colorado lawsuit seeking damages for harms related to climate change. The left-leaning groups cite Alito’s stock holdings in energy companies as the reason he should recuse himself.

But Alito, 76, is ignoring these calls, with a court spokesperson saying, “Alito does not have a financial interest in any party” involved in the case, and that his counsel has advised that “his recusal is not required.”

While Alito, a George W. Bush appointee, does not own stock in ExxonMobil or Suncor Energy, he did hold stock in oil companies ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, as well as several other energy firms, according to his most recent financial disclosure report, which was filed last year.

The liberal groups have accused Alito of “undermining public confidence in the impartiality of the court.”. “His irregular recusal practice in oil and gas industry-related cases is undermining public confidence in the impartiality of the Court. They could not occur were he compelled to adhere to enforceable ethics standards against adjudicating cases where he has financial interests or the appearance of a conflict of interest where his impartiality might reasonably be questioned,” the groups wrote.

Read more: https://www.thedailybeast.com/scotus-justice-samuel-alito-refuses-to-recuse-himself-over-conflict-of-interest-in-climate-case/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS Justice Refuses to Recuse Himself Over 'Conflict of Interest' (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago OP
Trump and his enablers don't care about ethics and act as if they've never heard of it. highplainsdem 16 hrs ago #1
Just add it to the list of articles of impeachment Fiendish Thingy 16 hrs ago #2
How could this add to [presumably Trump's] impeachment? Tben 14 hrs ago #3
I was referring to the court, not Trump Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #5
that train has left the station RussBLib 13 hrs ago #4
Keep records, there will be an impeachment RainCaster 9 hrs ago #6

Fiendish Thingy

(24,033 posts)
2. Just add it to the list of articles of impeachment
Sat May 16, 2026, 02:56 PM
16 hrs ago

We might not get enough votes in the senate for removal, but we sure as hell can investigate the shit out of his and Clarence’s finances next year.

Tben

(5 posts)
3. How could this add to [presumably Trump's] impeachment?
Sat May 16, 2026, 04:41 PM
14 hrs ago

The ethical lapses of a Supreme? Likely not even impeachable for Thomas (not treason, bribery or high crime or misdemeanor).

Fiendish Thingy

(24,033 posts)
5. I was referring to the court, not Trump
Sat May 16, 2026, 05:58 PM
12 hrs ago

“High crimes and misdemeanours” do not refer to statutory violations of the criminal code.

Impeachment is a political, not legal, process, and high crimes and misdemeanours can be whatever congress says they are.

In the 19th century, judges were impeached for public drunkenness.

My point is, all this corruption can be presented at impeachment hearing next year, and Clarence and Alito’s finances can be examined in open hearings, in public view.

Despite the futility of it, with no chance of removal, the hearings could raise public awareness of, and support for, court expansion in 2029.

RussBLib

(10,749 posts)
4. that train has left the station
Sat May 16, 2026, 05:45 PM
13 hrs ago

...and it's not even a high-speed train because the US is too (insert reason) to build any high-speed rail.

snip

liberal groups have accused Alito of “undermining public confidence in the impartiality of the court.”.


Yeah, a little late for that.

https://russblib.blogspot.com
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SCOTUS Justice Refuses to...