Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomWilm

(1,960 posts)
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 11:44 AM 4 hrs ago

Denmark considered destroying Greenland runways amid fears of US attack

Source: Euractiv / DR National Danish public-service

Denmark is reported to have quietly prepared to blow up its own runways in Greenland – as European allies rushed troops north – amid fears that the United States might attempt to seize the Arctic territory by force in January.

According to reporting by Danish national broadcaster DR, citing multiple senior sources in Copenhagen and across Europe, Danish forces deployed to Greenland in January 2026 carried explosives intended to destroy key airstrips in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq, in order to deny access to any incoming US military aircraft in a worst-case scenario.

The episode suggests the extent to which Denmark and its European allies appear to have considered – and prepared for – a potential military confrontation with the United States, highlighting strains in transatlantic relations and adding momentum to Europe’s push for greater strategic autonomy.

... The deployments were reportedly not merely symbolic. Aircraft are said to have transported blood supplies from Danish hospitals, indicating preparations for potential combat casualties. Danish F-35 fighter jets were reportedly armed and repositioned, while French naval assets and multinational troops were sent toward the Arctic. Several other European countries also hastily sent soldiers to Greenland at the height of the crisis ...

The US military operation in Venezuela on 3 January 2026 was a turning point. For European officials, the move demonstrated that President Donald Trump was willing to use force – elevating concerns that his repeated statements about “taking” Greenland might translate into action. ...

Read more: https://www.euractiv.com/news/denmark-considered-destroying-greenland-runways-amid-fears-of-us-attack/



My comment

The US bully methods require a reaction, but the Danish prime minister's investment in NATO and military hardware is a devastating mistake that does not create peace. Greenlanders, Danes and other helpers should instead prepare to defend Greenland completely without the use of weapons.

It is completely hopeless for tiny Denmark to defend with weapons against such a military giant. Therefore, stop the military fantasies about a "stumbling block", i.e. setting up one's own soldiers up for a quick defeat, as a sign that military resistance was tried and defeated.

That an active non-violent defense stands strongest against Trump's invasion forces can be seen in another of Trump's battlegrounds – namely on the streets of Minnesota and the other attacked cities in the USA. Here, ordinary citizens have successfully dampened the pressure from Trump's militia with such force that the active opposition of civil society actually forced Trump to retreat.

These completely fresh experiences are nicely in line with decades of research into how best to fight oppression, dictatorship and invasions. The chance of a lasting success in the fight for peace has been shown to be significantly higher when it is a broad part of the population that protests by peaceful means.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Denmark considered destroying Greenland runways amid fears of US attack (Original Post) TomWilm 4 hrs ago OP
I heartily disagree. Denmark very reasonably concluded that involving troops from France Ocelot II 4 hrs ago #1
Danish or EU troops would make absolutely no difference .. TomWilm 3 hrs ago #2
So what should Greenland and Denmark do? Ocelot II 3 hrs ago #4
I struggled to write a response, thanks for doing so displacedvermoter 3 hrs ago #3
What a load of codswallop. Spazito 3 hrs ago #5
Not to mention horsefeathers, balderdash and malarkey. Ocelot II 3 hrs ago #6
Exactly, well said! Spazito 3 hrs ago #7
Aren't we all just so proud bagimin 3 hrs ago #8
Nonviolent resistance works in some situations, but not all. Ocelot II 1 hr ago #9
Denmark was reportedly preparing for full-scale war with the US over Greenland in January LetMyPeopleVote 21 min ago #10

Ocelot II

(130,358 posts)
1. I heartily disagree. Denmark very reasonably concluded that involving troops from France
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 11:55 AM
4 hrs ago

and the other Nordics would be a strong deterrent. And so far it has been. You can't compare this situation to ICE in Minneapolis; there were more people in a single Minneapolis demonstration than the entire population of Greenland, and the goal of ICE was not the seizure of sovereign territory (although sometimes it felt that way). Denmark reacting nonviolently to a US invasion would result in complete capitulation and the forfeiture of Greenland, but the presence of other European allies responding to the attempted taking of sovereign territory would set up a situation (NATO vs. NATO) that would be so politically toxic that even Trump would avoid it. He cares about politics, not harm to humans, and he's starting to seeing that play out wrt Iran. Greenland and Minneapolis aren't apples and oranges; they're apples and pipe wrenches. Not even close.

TomWilm

(1,960 posts)
2. Danish or EU troops would make absolutely no difference ..
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:10 PM
3 hrs ago

... this would be a NATO country attacking another member any way it went down. Maybe the US would get some dead soldiers, which Trump then could brag about - evidence of the hostile Danes. Such meaningless resistance is just stupid!

Ocelot II

(130,358 posts)
4. So what should Greenland and Denmark do?
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:19 PM
3 hrs ago

Nonviolence worked against ICE in Minneapolis because ICE wasn't the US Army trying to take over the state by force; they were a bunch of goons sent to kidnap and disappear immigrants. We dealt with them nonviolently and effectively by following them, recording them, notifying the neighborhood that they were present, protesting everywhere, and making it very difficult for them to function. This is a metropolitan area of more than 3 million people while Greenland's population is about 50,000. What are those people supposed to do if Trump sends US troops? Hold demonstrations and wave homemade cardboard signs? Record them on their phones? Blow whistles? Throw dildos at them? How do you think Denmark should resist? Or should they just capitulate and give up Greenland, effectively telling the rest of the world that they can't fight back if Trump comes for their territory as well?

displacedvermoter

(4,327 posts)
3. I struggled to write a response, thanks for doing so
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:10 PM
3 hrs ago

for me.

Denmark was occupied by another fascist power not so many years ago, and I believe they are a proud people not willing to stand
for an assault from a so-called ally. And after what happened in Venezuela, I don't believe "building peace" was on their minds.

Good for Denmark, and her NATO allies.

Ocelot II

(130,358 posts)
9. Nonviolent resistance works in some situations, but not all.
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 02:37 PM
1 hr ago

Where it's effective is when you are up against an oppressive force but there are more of you than there are of them, and you can take deliberate action to throw so much sand in their gears that their mission becomes untenable, either because they can't function as they intended and/or because their actions lead to significant public disapproval and resulting political backlash. This worked in Minneapolis, as it worked during the civil rights movement of the '60s and Gandhi's opposition to British rule in India. Often these movements take a long time to defeat the opposition. Had it not been for the public outrage following the murders of Good and Pretti, we probably would still have 3,000 ICE agents in Minneapolis and we would still be out by the hundreds following vehicles, blowing whistles and throwing dildos, and we'd have to keep doing it indefinitely.

Direct nonviolent action would absolutely not work against an invasion of Greenland by US military forces, however; not the least because there aren't enough people in Greenland to raise a resistance movement that could effectively drive the forces out. Resistance movements work only when there are so many people willing to stand in front of the tanks or link arms on a bridge or allow themselves to be arrested that the occupiers' systems become overwhelmed. That's the sand in the gears. But if the gears are so large that sand doesn't impede them, nonviolent methods fail. The US could easily take over an unarmed, unassisted Greenland, but not so easily the well-armed forces of Denmark, Norway, Sweden and France. Even if the larger US forces could win in the end, the cost, both political and military, would be too great.

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,156 posts)
10. Denmark was reportedly preparing for full-scale war with the US over Greenland in January
Thu Mar 19, 2026, 03:48 PM
21 min ago

Denmark and its allies took trump's threats seriously
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2034577290701492468.html

Denmark was reportedly preparing for full-scale war with the US over Greenland in January, with military support from France, Germany, and Nordic nations. Elite troops and F-35 jets with live ammunition were sent, and runways were to be blown up to prevent an invasion. ⬇️
2/ The Danish public broadcaster DR reports that officials in Denmark, France and Germany say that Donald Trump's threats to seize Greenland were taken so seriously that wide-ranging preparations were made to forcibly resist a US invasion of the Danish island.
3/ The Danish and French governments worked together to create a northern European coalition to defend Greenland from the United States. Under the cover of a pre-planned defence exercise, Greenland's defences were bolstered to raise the costs of any US invasion attempt.
4/ This included sending blood to treat wounded soldiers; sending elite Danish troops and French alpine troops to Greenland; preparing Greenland's runways for demolition to prevent a Hostomel-style seizure; and sending armed F-35 jets to patrol the skies.


5/ The trigger for this, according to DR, was the American attack on Venezuela on 3 January 2026 in which President Nicolas Maduro was abducted and taken to the US......
9/ As well as alpine troops, France also sent a warship and refueling aircraft, pledged hundreds more soldiers, and expressed willingness to send anything else the Danes needed. Sweden, Norway, and the UK also sent military support to Greenland.
10/ As a source puts it, the French said: "Would you like more soldiers? You could have them. Would you like more naval support? You could have that. Would you like more air support? You could have that too."
11/ Sources that "the goal of having soldiers on land in Greenland – with as many different flags on their shoulders as possible – was ... so that the Americans would be forced to take a major hostile action if Donald Trump actually wanted to occupy Greenland militarily."
12/ Denmark chose to capitulate to the Nazi invasion of April 1940, but has vowed not to repeat that experience. Danish soldiers are under standing orders to resist with force any foreign incursions on the territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, which includes Greenland. ....
15/ "This is not over. Trump is here for three more years. And no matter what happens, the distrust and challenge to the [Danish] Commonwealth will persist as long as he has set out to go down in history by expanding the territory of the United States." /end
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Denmark considered destro...