Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,460 posts)
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 05:30 PM 18 hrs ago

Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements before midterms

Last edited Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:51 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: CNBC

Published Fri, Feb 13 2026 4:51 PM EST Updated 2 Hours Ago


President Donald Trump on Friday said he will issue an executive order "shortly" laying out the "legal reasons" for national voter-identification requirements. Trump, in posts late Friday to Truth Social, said he wants voter-ID laws implemented for the 2026 midterm elections, even though legislation mandating them appears poised to stall in Congress.

"The Democrats refuse to vote for Voter I.D., or Citizenship. The reason is very simple -- They want to continue to cheat in Elections," Trump posted to Truth Social.

"This was not what our Founders desired. I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future. There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!" he continued.

In a second post, published minutes after the first, Trump said, "If we can't get it through Congress, there are Legal reasons why this SCAM is not permitted. I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order."

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/13/trump-congress-voter-id-midterms.html



Article updated.

Previous article/headline -

Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter ID requirements before midterms


Published Fri, Feb 13 2026 4:51 PM EST Updated 8 Min Ago


President Donald Trump on Friday said he will "shortly" issue an executive order laying out the "legal reasons" for national voter-identification requirements.

Trump, in posts late Friday to Truth Social, said he wants voter-ID laws implemented for the 2026 midterm elections, even though legislation mandating them appears poised to stall in Congress.

"The Democrats refuse to vote for Voter I.D., or Citizenship. The reason is very simple -- They want to continue to cheat in Elections," Trump posted to Truth Social.

"This was not what our Founders desired. I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future. There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!" he continued.


This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements before midterms (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago OP
Doesn't work like that....... Lovie777 18 hrs ago #1
Different effect Lithos 16 hrs ago #21
Either way, we MUST educate the public and especially the MEDIA. That is not how EOs work. Bluetus 14 hrs ago #31
I like your words, which are true. chouchou 13 hrs ago #34
Yes, nicely defined Roy Rolling 7 hrs ago #39
And I should have mentioned the big 2 Bluetus 15 min ago #43
Executive orders are worthless for making laws about elections MacKasey 18 hrs ago #2
all laws or orders are as effective as the ability to enforce them quakerboy 15 hrs ago #24
What if the SC's six sycophants BlueKota 15 hrs ago #28
He has "searched the depths of Legal Arguments" livetohike 18 hrs ago #3
Right! If his sycophantic "aides" in legal matters didn't tell him Justice matters. 10 hrs ago #37
The federal government does not control state elections or id requirements for the states... wcmagumba 18 hrs ago #4
Let's think positive. He may, well, you know. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #5
I know for sure, from all my friends here that what TSF is saying is bluestarone 18 hrs ago #6
"researched the depths of legal arguments not yet articulated or vetted." onenote 18 hrs ago #7
No there won't. Shut the fuck up, Donnie. paleotn 18 hrs ago #8
Impotent POTUS says what? Fiendish Thingy 18 hrs ago #9
unfortunately voter ID is popular. just what kind is the sticking point. here in hawaii one has to provide ID to msongs 18 hrs ago #10
Here in Philly BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago #14
In January, trump's March executive order on elections was struck down LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #11
The Constitution blocks presidents from changing election rules. LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #12
It takes one to know one Puppyjive 17 hrs ago #13
Just like it's the Gulf of America whether Congress wants it or not. JohnnyRingo 17 hrs ago #15
Google uses it Polybius 16 hrs ago #20
Yeah, and fuck them for that. I've avoided using google since they capitulated to the orange POS POTUS LymphocyteLover 15 hrs ago #23
Same! n/t pazzyanne 14 hrs ago #32
Google has monopoly suits against them. JohnnyRingo 3 hrs ago #41
It might not work that way but this will be his rationale for having ICE disrupt elections in Blue states and cities. ChicagoTeamster 17 hrs ago #16
Judgment is coming, Mr. Trump Prairie Gates 16 hrs ago #17
"...laying out the 'legal reasons' for national voter-identification requirements." BaronChocula 16 hrs ago #18
Trump could not possibly have written that post. There are far too many multi syllable words in it. flashman13 16 hrs ago #19
Stephen Miller must be blowing smoke up his ass again Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 16 hrs ago #22
I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, 3825-87867 15 hrs ago #25
Whatever Happened to STATES RIGHTS Mr.Bee 15 hrs ago #26
Basically it's republican rights Tree Lady 9 hrs ago #38
The Sharpie he uses to sign it will be worth more than the EO. He ought to read the Constitution. Vinca 15 hrs ago #27
He thinks he is a king.... His dementia is getting worse. ashredux 14 hrs ago #29
Prepare for disruption of mid-term elections. thought crime 14 hrs ago #30
if this passes we need a GoFund Me to raise money to gopiscrap 13 hrs ago #33
How Would This Not Violate The 10th Amendment? DallasNE 13 hrs ago #35
It's a tantrum response to Thune telling him they don't have the votes to nuke the filibuster pat_k 11 hrs ago #36
The Feds have no authority in elections Blumancru 5 hrs ago #40
"Quiet! QUIET!! Piggy!!!" maxrandb 2 hrs ago #42

Lithos

(26,612 posts)
21. Different effect
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:04 PM
16 hrs ago

It provides a shield for Red/Purple states like Texas to crack down on voter suppression.

L-

Bluetus

(2,515 posts)
31. Either way, we MUST educate the public and especially the MEDIA. That is not how EOs work.
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 09:50 PM
14 hrs ago

An Executive order cannot create or change law, and it cannot compel action that is contrary to law.

An EO is simply that, an order to EXECUTIVE BRANCH EMPLOYEES about how they should conduct their job. It has no weight on anybody or any entity that is not directly in the President's chain of command. It cannot direct corporations to do anything. It cannot direct states to do anything. It cannot direct individuals to do anything. And it cannot direct Exec Branch employees to do anything that is against the law or outside their legal authority.

So PLEASE, I beg everyone, if you make a post about one of Trump's bullshit EOs, please take an extra 30 seconds to explain what EOs are and what they are not.

Bluetus

(2,515 posts)
43. And I should have mentioned the big 2
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 11:58 AM
15 min ago

Above all else, an EO cannot direct any judge to do anything, and the EO cannot direct any legislator to do anything. That's called separation of powers.

quakerboy

(14,792 posts)
24. all laws or orders are as effective as the ability to enforce them
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:27 PM
15 hrs ago

And they have a highly funded, rapidly growing, personally loyal, legally unaccountable paramilitary force with no compunction against killing citizens for no reason.

Constitutions only work if they are upheld. Ours appears to be dead paper with a reputation rather than a relevant living doccument at this point.

Barring some change, this will get a lot uglier, probably soon.

BlueKota

(5,166 posts)
28. What if the SC's six sycophants
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:58 PM
15 hrs ago

rule it's constitutional even though it's not? It wouldn't be the first time they ruled against actual Constitutional law, for their orange deity.

Justice matters.

(9,572 posts)
37. Right! If his sycophantic "aides" in legal matters didn't tell him
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 01:31 AM
10 hrs ago

it doesn't work like that, he would have made the EO already.

But like stated above, red states could take the bait and pass laws that require a photo ID to vote, but they are red states anyway.

OTOH, blue states will ignore his shenanigan, which will allow him to claim it was rigged.

bluestarone

(21,712 posts)
6. I know for sure, from all my friends here that what TSF is saying is
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 05:39 PM
18 hrs ago

BULLSHIT!! He has NO AUTHORITY to do any of this. My biggest concern is ICE and how THEY could destroy our midterm election. SCARY days ahead.

onenote

(46,077 posts)
7. "researched the depths of legal arguments not yet articulated or vetted."
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 05:48 PM
18 hrs ago

The chances Trump wrote that are approximately 0.0 percent.

msongs

(73,302 posts)
10. unfortunately voter ID is popular. just what kind is the sticking point. here in hawaii one has to provide ID to
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:12 PM
18 hrs ago

register, mostly for proof of residency. I dont recall having to show ID at the voting place. there is a huge vote by mail turnout here

BumRushDaShow

(167,460 posts)
14. Here in Philly
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:55 PM
17 hrs ago

we only need to show an ID if voting "in person" for the very first time and/or if changing voting division due to a move, and voting in that polling place for the first time. If requesting an absentee ballot (either "no excuse" or as a regular absentee), then some kind of ID verification is required (driver's license number or last 4 digits of SS#) to apply for a ballot.

After that when voting, no ID is needed and the voter still needed to sign-in before voting (I'm guessing with signature check as I stopped doing in person during the pandemic in 2020 and haven't done in person since). I know they updated to using the electronic poll books after I stopped in-person voting and I think that is how people now sign in (used to be big binders with pages of names and a line to sign).

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,211 posts)
11. In January, trump's March executive order on elections was struck down
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:19 PM
17 hrs ago

trump cannot change state election laws by executive order. The last election executive order was struck down. trump needs for congress to act which is NOT going to happen



https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-there-will-be-voter-i-d-for-the-midterm-elections-whether-approved-by-congress-or-not/

In January, a federal court issued a permanent injunction against Trump’s March, 2025 executive order that attempted to require documentary proof of citizenship on voter registration and limitations on mail-in ballots. In her opinion, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, articulated why the Founders entrusted administration of elections first with the states in the Constitution’s Election’s Clause.

“The Framers of our Constitution recognized that power over election rules could be abused, either to destroy the national government or to disempower the people from acting as a check on their elected representatives,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote. “Accordingly, they entrusted this power to the parts of our government that they believed would be most responsive to the will of the people: first to the States, and then, in some instances, to Congress.

The idea that immigrants are being brought into the United States to vote is a far-right conspiracy theory that has been repeatedly disproven. It is already illegal for noncitizens to vote, and those that do so intentionally are easily caught, prosecuted, imprisoned for years, and then deported, all for the chance to cast a single ballot out of hundreds of thousands. Consequently, noncitizen voting is exceptionally rare, as election officials and court findings across the country have persistently shown.

Similarly, mail-in ballots are popular across the country and have shown no evidence of being particularly susceptible to electoral fraud. The SAVE America Act would not limit mail-in ballots, but another bill recently introduced in the House, the Make Elections Great Again Act, would.

JohnnyRingo

(20,672 posts)
15. Just like it's the Gulf of America whether Congress wants it or not.
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 06:57 PM
17 hrs ago

I read a newspaper every day. No one uses that name, or Dept of War.

No mention of how he's going to enforce it in blue states.

JohnnyRingo

(20,672 posts)
41. Google has monopoly suits against them.
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 09:03 AM
3 hrs ago

Sure, they could grow a backbone and spit in his eye, but they might not like the consequences.
AP and Reuters have a 1st amendment shield around them, but Google is a business, and yes, they probably are close to a monopoly. They can temporarily appease him and continue to enjoy that advantage.

It's too bad when companies knuckle under for him, and it certainly frustrates that he can influence them, but he's the president that breaks things.

It seems like their cooperation is half hearted anyway. I searched Gulf of America:

[img][/img]

BaronChocula

(4,237 posts)
18. "...laying out the 'legal reasons' for national voter-identification requirements."
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 07:29 PM
16 hrs ago

So basically filing a brief no one will read. It's already in the FOANX News script.

3825-87867

(1,858 posts)
25. I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject,
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:28 PM
15 hrs ago

And if they've not been "articulated etc" then how could he have searched...blah, blah, blubber.

Mr.Bee

(1,728 posts)
26. Whatever Happened to STATES RIGHTS
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 08:31 PM
15 hrs ago
Is being in love with trump mean you have to give up Republicants demands about
States Rights over their elections and how they're handled??

States, Not the President, Run Elections in America

thought crime

(1,385 posts)
30. Prepare for disruption of mid-term elections.
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 09:49 PM
14 hrs ago

We need to have legal strategies to help prevent disruption, because they mean to do it.

DallasNE

(7,989 posts)
35. How Would This Not Violate The 10th Amendment?
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 10:34 PM
13 hrs ago

As well as the Articles in the Constitution assigning elections to the States? I presume Trump will claim emergency powers override the clear intent.

pat_k

(12,883 posts)
36. It's a tantrum response to Thune telling him they don't have the votes to nuke the filibuster
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 12:18 AM
11 hrs ago

I have no doubt that Trump has been trying to strongarm/bully Thune to whip his conference to vote to nuke the filibuster.

As I posted in another thread

Expect renewed demands from the felon to go nuclear to get SAVE passed

Fingers crossed that enough Republicans would vote against ending the filibuster, but I expect that ENORMOUS pressure will be put on Thune to whip his conference into nuking the filibuster.

The felon is hellbent on doing everything in his power to end free and fair elections in the United States. To that end, I have no doubt the regime will pull out all the stops in their efforts to get the new version of the SAVE act passed in the Senate.

We must not underestimate the regime's determination on this.

As long as our elections are capable of measuring the true will of the American people (even imperfectly), we can thwart their effort reshape the U.S. into the mold of other illiberal democracies.

They know this.


I suspect this EO will never actually materialize. It has the ring of other angry threats to do this or that "shortly" that have gone by the wayside. Of course, sycophants may come up with some bullshit EO to placate him, but if they do, I would be SHOCKED if it weren't universally rejected by the courts -- including SCOTUS.

Blumancru

(238 posts)
40. The Feds have no authority in elections
Sat Feb 14, 2026, 06:47 AM
5 hrs ago

It falls to the individual states. The states that will honor this Executive Order are states that vote red anyway. I don’t think this will have much effect.
Interesting and a little off subject that there is nothing in the constitution requiring a popular vote for president. The states can choose the electors any way they want to. The legislature can appoint them or whatever.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says he will issue ...