Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jose Garcia

(3,432 posts)
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 10:25 AM Friday

Supreme Court Resolves Split Over Federal Inmates' Habeas Rights

Source: Bloomberg

A provision of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act requiring federal courts to dismiss certain previously raised habeas corpus claims applies only to state prisoners’ applications, the US Supreme Court said Friday.

“AEDPA is replete with examples of Congress treating state and federal prisoners differently,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the 5-4 court.

The decision resolves a six-to-three circuit split that the justices were eager to resolve over the extent of the law’s applicability.

Significant structural barriers resulted in the question presented in petitioner Michael Bowe’s case having a history of evading review.

Read more: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/supreme-court-resolves-split-over-federal-inmates-habeas-rights

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Resolves Split Over Federal Inmates' Habeas Rights (Original Post) Jose Garcia Friday OP
Of course Gorsuch, Alito and Thomas were moniss Friday #1
I could use a translation. snot Friday #2

moniss

(8,749 posts)
1. Of course Gorsuch, Alito and Thomas were
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 10:42 AM
Friday

on the side of restricting the ability of a non corporate plaintiff to seek justice.

snot

(11,523 posts)
2. I could use a translation.
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 11:55 AM
Friday

Not sure what a habeas claim looks like in this context.

Not sure about the equities (fairness) of when such claims should be dismissible, especially if they've been raised and dismissed previously without arguable error.

Not sure about the equities of treating such claims differently depending on whether the claimants are in state or federal prisons.

Etc.

(If the explanations are long & difficult, maybe we should just let this slide over my head & stay there; but I thought it can't hurt to ask.)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Resolves Sp...