Jack Smith testifies in closed-door hearing that it was his decision to charge Trump, according to testimony
Source: CNN Politics
Updated Dec 17, 2025, 11:04 AM ET
PUBLISHED Dec 17, 2025, 5:00 AM ET
Former special counsel Jack Smith on Wednesday defended his criminal investigation into President Donald Trump in a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee as he faces scrutiny from Republican lawmakers.
The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts, Smith said in portions of his opening statement obtained by CNN.
Smith was called to testify about Trumps alleged mishandling and retention of classified documents and his role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election, according to sources familiar with the investigation. He also is seeking to clarify issues surrounding the use of phone records he subpoenaed of lawmakers Trump spoke with about the election scheme. I didnt choose those members; President Trump did, Smith said, according to the statements obtained by CNN.
But there may be details Smith may not be willing or able to testify about on Wednesday, such as parts of the second volume of his report around Trumps handling of classified documents in Mar-a-Lago, the source added.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/17/politics/jack-smith-house-judiciary-committee-testimony
Full headline: Jack Smith testifies in closed-door hearing that it was his decision to charge Trump, according to testimony obtained by CNN
Goonch
(4,198 posts)
Prairie Gates
(7,131 posts)Justice matters.
(9,281 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,301 posts)KS Toronado
(22,907 posts)Rs will hide as much information as they can from us.
Wednesdays
(21,546 posts)slightlv
(7,396 posts)We pay for all this, it concerns OUR safety, national security, and election validity. All three aspects are imperative for the American people to know so that they can make informed decisions.
Merely hiding the messenger and the evidence to avoid bad PR is not an option, AFAIC!
Sogo
(6,951 posts)nt.
thought crime
(1,145 posts)while Trump was in office (i.e. immune from prosecution).
Blue Full Moon
(3,111 posts)Jack Smith
I blame Merrick Garland for the delays that allowed Trump to run out the clock.
And, here we are AGAIN!!
https://apnews.com/article/jack-smith-congress-justice-department-d35557d525fcfe51a20d08c6abb7f71d
BumRushDaShow
(165,170 posts)So you think that "Daddy John Roberts", who has been the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS for 20 years, would suddenly create a special "carve-out" to Garland to allow his office to actually prosecute 45?
Why people keep thinking that Roberts, who has protected 45 from day one, would suddenly have a change of heart, is mind-boggling.
The Roberts "shadow docket" is clear as day and why people won't see that is sad.
With Roberts, there was no "clock". It wasn't going to happen.