Space junk cleanup should adopt same strategy as ocean conservation, experts propose
Source: Salon
Published January 11, 2025 2:33PM (EST)
Humans like to imagine Earth as a pristine blue marble surrounded by empty space and glowing stars. In fact, though, human space exploration and industrialization has polluted the area around our planet, with the resulting debris known as space junk. The problem is expected to only grow as the demand for satellites increases with our desire to explore our solar system, but it could get so bad that it could ground space travel indefinitely. What can be done?
An international collaboration of scientists in fields from satellite technology to ocean plastic pollution authored a recent review in the journal One Earth suggesting a strategy for one day restoring Earths orbit to its once-uncluttered status: Just use the same methods for cleaning up our oceans.
Because this space junk poses serious risk to astronauts and infrastructure in space as well as presenting problems on the ground for people using GPS, cell phone data and weather monitoring scientists are determined to fix this mess. The researchers argue this can be accomplished by forcing the producers of debris to be held financially accountable, developing and enforcing international legislation, creating incentives for companies to minimize orbital debris and stimulating collective scientific cooperation.
"The buildup of debris in these crucial orbits heightens the risk of collisions with operational assets and diminishes the sustainability of these valuable spaces," the authors write. "Therefore, it is crucial to treat the orbital environment as a finite resource that requires protection and conservation."
Read more: https://www.salon.com/2025/01/11/space-junk-cleanup-should-adopt-same-strategy-as-ocean-conservation-experts-propose/
Link to PUBLICATION (PDF) - https://www.cell.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2590-3322%2824%2900598-0
msongs
(70,353 posts)xocetaceans
(4,006 posts)Or will he just collect the profit from Starlink and leave it to the government and the taxpayers to clean up after him?
It would be ironic if Musk subjected the Earth to the Kessler syndrome and thereby cut off Earth from Mars and elsewhere.
(It's not like his claims of putting a base on Mars are really believable anyway. How is his track record with many of his other claims, technology, and promises? FSD? How many years behind is he and at what cost to the taxpayers?)
In that paper, there is a link to this article on Space.com:
By Tereza Pultarova Contributions from Adam Mann, Daisy Dobrijevic
last updated 3 days ago
Are Starlink satellites a grand innovation or an astronomical menace?
...
The problem, the scientists said, is that in those high layers of the atmosphere, the particles are likely going to stay forever. Boley said that while the number of satellites burning in the atmosphere will be considerably smaller than the number of meteorites, the chemical composition of the artificial objects is different, thus the presence of the products of their burning is something scientists know nothing about.
"We have 54 tonnes (60 tons) of meteoroid material coming in every day," Boley said. "With the first generation of Starlink, we can expect about 2 tonnes (2.2 tons) of dead satellites reentering Earth's atmosphere daily. But meteoroids are mostly rock, which is made of oxygen, magnesium and silicon. These satellites are mostly aluminum, which the meteoroids contain only in a very small amount, about 1%."
As the accumulation of those particles would increase over time, so would the intensity of the effects. It thus cannot be ruled out that over decades the pollution from burning megaconstellation satellites could lead to changes on a scale akin to what we are currently experiencing with fossil-fuel-induced climate change.
"Humans are exceptionally good at underestimating our ability to change the environment," said Boley. "There is this perception that there is no way that we can dump enough plastic into the ocean to make a difference. There is no way we can dump enough carbon into the atmosphere to make a difference. But here we are. We have a plastic pollution problem with the ocean, we have climate change ongoing as a result of our actions and our changing of the composition of the atmosphere and we are poised to make the same type of mistake by our use of space."
...
https://www.space.com/spacex-starlink-satellites.html
paleotn
(19,693 posts)If he does, it's childish and unworkable.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,860 posts)mrchris
(10 posts)we are going to do nothing?
Firestorm49
(4,249 posts)Igel
(36,351 posts)It pays to pull out to see more. You can also zoom in to ID most of the objects and their orbits, if you want.