She's scheduled a hearing on the matter for January 21st?

Edited to point out it WAS in the public's interest to know what went down before voting for POTUS. Since Cannon was the sole reason we didn't get a trial on the matter in a timely manner, she can sit down and STFU.

Yeah, I have reached to point of being OK with being uncivil with these jerks working AGAINST the public's interests

… but there’s no force behind our disapprobation.

She’s a federal judge whose ruling that he wasn’t legally appointed to the role has not been overturned… and if he isn’t legally a special prosecutor, then he doesn’t have the power to produce reports.

And all she has to do is avoid getting overturned before the 20th (assuming this wasn’t a temporary order that she ends up undoing herself)

Unless you're just an average, run of the mill American, them it can wreak havoc on you and ruin your life -- deservedly or not.

He can appeal her to a higher court but otherwise the judiciary is co-equal to the executive.

Get used to that argument from our side. Federal judges blocking executive officials until/unless they are overturned by higher courts will be our primary hope for at least the next two years

of us preaching about democratic values and rule of law. What a farce this country has become.

This is a duplicate of the same news story posted earlier.

Dupe of https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143368424