The people have a right to know.

If the shoe was on the other party, you know damn well that report would be public and on the front page of every newspaper within a day.

But in this shithole???

and why does his pet judge get to decide?

and it will make perfect sense. 👌

Of course. That’s what innocent people do to prove their innocence.

Post it on all your social media accounts, Joe. 🙏

For the love of all that’s holy, release them all!

He’s more likely to bury this one as well since he doesn’t want to look political. Smith should just release it himself, mostly unredacted, and head back to The Hague for his own safety.

It wouldn't have made any difference.

The worse Trump ends up looking in terms of his character, the more they love him.

Trump supporters, like Trump himself, are evil incarnate.

We have watched the arch-defendant slink and slither away from justice so often that most of realized the battlefield to defeat Trumpf was going to be in the election booth, not the courtroom (e.g. federal, state, county).

And no matter how scathing the SC report is, and whether it was released before 5 Nov 2024, MAGA Republicans were going to vote for Trumpf anyway.



Trumpf's numbers increased every election:

"Viewed in raw numbers, Trumpf got about 63 million votes in 2016, 74 million in 2020 and nearly 77 million in 2024."

Meanwhile, the Democratic Party turnout for Harris/Walz was drastically lower in 2024 than it was for Biden/Harris in 2020:

"Vice President Kamala Harris received about 6.8 million fewer votes than Joe Biden in 2020, while President-elect Donald Trump gained around 2.8 million compared with 2020."

For example, Kamala Harris captured 55% of New York State’s votes to Trump’s 45%, the thinnest blue majority since 1992.

Americans deserve to read the unredacted Special Counsel report on Trumpf as as soon as possible as this is the result of our hard-working taxpayer funds at work. But releasing the report before that crucial Tuesday would not have tipped the scale for Kamala Harris.

Sources:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/27/politics/election-voters-harris-what-matters-dg/index.html

https://nysfocus.com/2024/11/06/how-new-york-voted-2024-harris-trump-senate

Whatever King Donnie wants, King Donnie gets.

Oh, and FUCK TRAITOR TRUMP!

Like right now. This morning.

I have no expectation that this will happen, though. The fix is in.

She did.

If they rule against Cannon, does it get appealed to the Supremes immediately?

Seems to me it's a product of public work and we're entitled to see it regardless of her ruling.

And then read that the two lawyers are to be named #2 and #3 at DOJ, so I guess because they are incoming they get to see it just like other appointments. Its obvious why those two would be appointed. Its all complete bullshit and corruption.

And this has nothing to do with Judge Cannon.

could ever have. Much better than Barr.

sheep at Bedminster.... ostensibly for keeping the grass in shape. But some people say he has a favorite "girl" among the herd. Not only that: SHE'S BLACK !

I heard that was in Smith's report and that's why Trump doesn't want it to be released. Melania might ask for a divorce if that gets out.

47 months and counting, thank you Merrick the Meek.

And Merrick release the unredacted Mueller and Epstein files before they are lost all together with the 🍊💩🤡’s new national archivist.

And here is Trump with thousands of and thousands of pages of our top secrets and
nothing is going to happen to him. @ the very least we should see the report of what
he did.

Would any media (MSM, cable, radio, podcasts) report on it? (Besides Rachel, Chris, etc.?)

I'm sure it would exonerate the Jan 6th committee, since all this started based on what the 1/6 committee found, embarrassing Garland into actually doing something, 1.5+ years after it happened.

Over the weekend, the president-elect's lawyers read a draft of the special counsel's final report. They then scrambled to keep it hidden from the public.
https://bsky.app/profile/donestep.bsky.social/post/3lf5vz434ys2y

Link to tweet

We most likely will not. Aileen Cannon, Merrick Garland and scotus are not small obstacles.

He should have just released it and then told anyone who didn’t like it to fuck off!

He should just release it. Any agreement they give him they will just break anyway.

The insurrection took place in DC

If you think the report would make Trump look bad, just imagine what it would do to Merrick Garland. To have such vast amounts of incontrovertible evidence and to have insured that nothing was done is almost certainly the biggest betrayal of their country, by any person in history.
Garland knowingly oversaw the protection of a group of individuals intent on seizing the country for their own personal desires. My disgust at Garland is only matched by my disgust at the "podcast lawyers" who of four years have told their listeners that we are are too ignorant to understand the legal system and that we should not be impatient. They preached down to us, condemning those who pointed out that was nothing was being done. Through four years when public outcry and protest may have spurred Biden to remove Garland, those faux liberal law mongers did everything they could to quell the slightest complaint.
They sold lies along with their vitamin supplements and magical products.
And now they are trying to reframe their "mission statements" with fresh promises of how if we buy a subscription they will lead us to the promised land. They have been enablers of a DOJ that had shown its plan to do nothing.
Garland will not release the report, Trumps new AG will insure that it is classified or destroyed. The final act after years of being told that checks and balances would save us. That Mueller would save us. That two impeachments would save us. That the J6 committee would save us. That New York trials would save us. That Georgia trials would save us. That Florida trials would save us.
Nobody is coming to save us, and if they say they are, they are lying to encourage your inaction.

I hope Jack Smith's self reservation instincts are so strong that he does the following:
1. Load all pertinent information and documentation onto a couple of thumb drives.
2. Take his family and move to Great Britain or Holland.
3. Arrange publication with a British publisher.
4. Move to an isolated community or the Highlands, maybe Northern Ireland.

Guaranteed Best Seller!

When Trump's bought and paid for judges block release someone needs to leak this report. Time for a present day Daniel Ellsberg.

Journalists (and us at DU) will be monitoring: https://www.justice.gov/sco-smith

The attorneys on DU can comment better on this, but SC Jack Smith seemed to have rendered a professional courtesy to his legal adversaries by allowing them to read the report and voice their objections before national publication (which they did).

Unfortunately, if/when released there will be redactions to protect sources and methods.

If somehow Jack Smith is blocked from releasing it, I imagine a staff member might leak the report like in 2023 when someone leaked damaging SCOTUS memos regarding Roe vs. Wade.

Here is a website chock full of secrets: https://ddosecrets.com/

And international and domestic hackers may be busy trying to obtain his report this very moment.

Source:

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/19/five-takeaways-from-supreme-court-leak-investigation-00078673

There needs to be a massive leak on January 25. The leak needs to occur during the Felon administration.

and why would they ever want it to see the light of day, he controls Congress, the DOJ, and most of the Supreme Court.

90 million people didn't vote and the majority of voters didn't vote for him

He acts like he won by a landslide....WTF, how did we get here so quickly

Because if he can, he should do it about 10 am on Jan 20.