Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,075 posts)
Wed Dec 25, 2024, 04:05 AM Dec 25

Court rejects Jan. 6 rioter's double jeopardy claim after judge resentenced him to more prison time following appeal

Source: Law & Crime

Dec 24th, 2024, 4:58 pm


A Jan. 6 rioter lost his court battle after he claimed a judge violated double jeopardy when he sentenced him to more prison time after he won an appeal that threw out his original sentence.

Senior U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth sentenced James Little to 60 days in jail and three months probation in a so-called “split sentence” after the defendant pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge. Little appealed, claiming the charge for which he was convicted did not allow for a split sentence. The U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia ruled in his favor in August 2023.

Lamberth, a Ronald Reagan appointee, subsequently resentenced Little to 150 days imprisonment with credit for time served. Little appealed that sentence, claiming Lamberth had violated the Double Jeopardy Clause that states a person cannot be punished twice for the same crime. But the DC Circuit rejected Little’s argument, saying he was not punished twice but merely resentenced after the original sentence was thrown out.

“Little argues that his new sentence violates the Double Jeopardy Clause because the district court imposed additional punishment after Little had already completed the term of incarceration that was part of his illegal split sentence,” Joe Biden appointee U.S. Circuit Judge Florence Pan wrote. “He also contends that he had a legitimate expectation of finality in his original sentence. Both of Little’s arguments are unpersuasive.” Double Jeopardy does not apply when a person is being resentenced, the court ruled.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/arguments-are-unpersuasive-court-rejects-jan-6-rioters-double-jeopardy-claim-after-judge-resentenced-him-to-more-prison-time-following-appeal-victory/



Full headline: ‘Arguments are unpersuasive’: Court rejects Jan. 6 rioter’s double jeopardy claim after judge resentenced him to more prison time following appeal victory
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court rejects Jan. 6 rioter's double jeopardy claim after judge resentenced him to more prison time following appeal (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Dec 25 OP
if he already served the 60 days why appeal? rampartd Dec 25 #1
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court rejects Jan. 6 riot...