Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(144,158 posts)
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:03 PM Yesterday

Giuliani urges judge not to reveal why his former lawyers quit in defamation case from election workers

Source: Law & Crime

Dec 23rd, 2024, 11:02 am


Rudy Giuliani is asking a federal judge in New York not to release court documents detailing why his two attorneys suddenly quit while representing him in the receivership case concerning the $148 million he owes to the two Georgia election workers he defamed.

The defamed election workers — Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea ArShaye “Shaye” Moss — have been in ongoing and often contentious litigation with Giuliani to collect on that judgment.

The filing, from Giuliani’s new attorney, Joseph M. Cammarata, came in response to U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman ordering Giuliani and the plaintiffs in the case to inform the court whether they objected to unsealing the declarations from Giuliani’s former lead attorney, Kenneth Caruso, and former co-counsel, David Labkowski, regarding why they chose to withdraw from representing the former New York City mayor — a move they made without informing their client.

In response, Giuliani argued that Caruso and Labkowski should never have filed their motions to withdraw with the court, but even so, the motions were “rendered moot” once Giuliani, his former attorneys, and Cammarata signed a consent order granting substitution of attorney. The consent order was filed one day after Caruso and Labkowski sought to withdraw from the case, but Liman did not immediately sign the order.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/it-would-serve-no-purpose-giuliani-urges-judge-not-to-reveal-why-his-former-lawyers-quit-in-defamation-case-from-election-workers-without-telling-their-client/



Full headline: ‘It would serve no purpose’: Giuliani urges judge not to reveal why his former lawyers quit in defamation case from election workers without telling their client

Link to FILING (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.626017/gov.uscourts.nysd.626017.189.0.pdf
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RockRaven

(16,522 posts)
1. Giuliani has already publicly declared himself to be broke, so it would serve
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:10 PM
Yesterday

no purpose to hide that lack of payment was the issue... So that leaves what? Failure to follow their instructions? Sexual harassment? Bad hygiene?

Mike 03

(17,359 posts)
5. Exactly. He's been arguing he's broke, so it's not anything to do with
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 04:10 PM
Yesterday

his financial status. My guess is it revolves around his reputed alcoholism, a character trait that made him impossible to work with, or something else that rendered him unable to participate constructively in his own defense or to comprehend the legal proceedings. (Obviously just pure speculation).

smb

(3,593 posts)
10. Yep
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 10:36 PM
21 hrs ago

The fact that Ghouliani wants to hide it suggests that the documents reveal that he asked his attorneys to do something illegal and they refused so they didn't end up going to prison with him.

Volaris

(10,645 posts)
14. I was going to suggest that yeah, they probably didnt want to get slapped
Tue Dec 24, 2024, 06:57 PM
1 hr ago

With contempt or obstruction charges lol.

I'd want that information sealed, too.

Mike 03

(17,359 posts)
6. Maybe the lying. That's not a bad guess. But as for being
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 04:14 PM
Yesterday

a sack of shit, I mean even the Hillside Stranglers found legal representation. The "Sacramento Vampire" was psychotic and had attorneys. Charles Ng. Lawrence Bittaker. The list of sacks of shit who had attorneys is gargantuan.

IbogaProject

(3,768 posts)
9. The bar is lower in criminal court
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 08:02 PM
Yesterday

In Bankruptcy Court the plaintiff (Ghouliani) has to prove his case beyond any counter case. Two issues are paying for the attorneys and the other more serious is trying to get them to lie.

LetMyPeopleVote

(155,487 posts)
4. I doubt or hope that the judge will not agree to Rudy's demand/request
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:22 PM
Yesterday

This information needs to come out

keithbvadu2

(40,484 posts)
7. My guess would be that they found he was hiding assets, and they did not want to be part of it.
Mon Dec 23, 2024, 04:31 PM
Yesterday

Tweedy

(1,220 posts)
15. It would serve the purpose of truth
Tue Dec 24, 2024, 07:50 PM
29 min ago

Which considering Mr. Giuliani’s lies landed him in this hot pot, seems quite sufficient rationale to me.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Giuliani urges judge not ...