Democratic Sen. Fetterman: 'I'm not rooting against' Trump
Source: ABC News
Pennsylvania Democrat Sen. John Fetterman said he hopes President-elect Donald Trump is successful in his second term and that he's not "rooting against him."
"If you're rooting against the president, you are rooting against the nation," Fetterman told ABC "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl. "So country first. I know that's become maybe like a cliche, but it happens to be true."
Fetterman, who has made headlines as one of the few in his party who have met with several of Trump's cabinet picks, said his Democratic colleagues need to "chill out" over everything Trump does.
"I've been warning people, like, 'You got to chill out,' you know? Like the constant, you know, freakout, it's not helpful," Fetterman said. "Pack a lunch, pace yourself, because he hasn't even taken office yet."
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democratic-sen-fetterman-im-rooting-trump/story?id=117020586
Democrats need to chill out? WTF?
Turbineguy
(38,496 posts)Trump doesn't need our help to fail. He can do that on his own. He's an idiot and a screw-up.
Dennis Donovan
(27,378 posts)His present passivity is not what I expected. Frankly, I'm disappointed.
NotHardly
(1,363 posts)Irish_Dem
(59,656 posts)I didn't have a good feeling about it at the time.
But thought he made a good recovery.
My opinion is being revised in light of current puzzling nonsensical statements.
Southern_gent
(6 posts)ificandream
(10,730 posts)The real proof will be his reactions to what Trump does once he's in.
niyad
(120,650 posts)orders of magnitude worse.
MayReasonRule
(1,932 posts)Time will tell.
It always does.
IA8IT
(5,926 posts)Fullduplexxx
(8,364 posts)padah513
(2,676 posts)Think. Again.
(19,028 posts)C0RI0LANUS
(1,843 posts)nowforever
(411 posts)But am 100% certain he will. And I can wait for that without rooting. I am rooting for atherosclerosis and all the benefits
Think. Again.
(19,028 posts)ificandream
(10,730 posts)He's holding back. Which is fine. The real proof will be what happens when Trump gets in.
Lulu KC
(4,990 posts)Yawn.
House of Roberts
(5,746 posts)I'm 'rooting' against the traitor that I know Trump is. We have to 'defeat the evil' as John McCain once said in a debate with Obama. That stood out in my mind all these years.
LisaL
(46,752 posts)"If you can't beat them, join them."
Paladin
(28,971 posts)malthaussen
(17,785 posts)Paladin
(28,971 posts)As a Texan, let me invite you to insult Senator Ted Cruz. The proper regional term is "Arrogant Shit-For-Brains Douchebag."
Fiendish Thingy
(18,800 posts)I hope Shapiro primaries him in 2028- he would beat him easily.
regnaD kciN
(26,641 posts)and turned Sen. Casey out, I suspect we may have to deal with Sen. Fettermanchin for a long, long time.
Fiendish Thingy
(18,800 posts)Then his career will be over.
JohnSJ
(96,808 posts)have demonstrated exactly where he is coming from, and to pretend his unqualified nominations, his unhinged threats against legislators and others is normal, and he should not be criticized is bullshit.
If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, its a Fetterman, and it doesnt take rocket science to understand this.
I never actually trusted him, and was for Lamb from the get go. Populists always sound good in the beginning, but there is a 50-50 chance they will come back and bite you. Sinema, formerly a Green Party member had a similar resumé, and both ended up with libertarian colors when their actual populist mask was removed.
Hope22
(3,098 posts)Its not that Im on a different page but a different book altogether.
malthaussen
(17,785 posts)FakeNoose
(35,998 posts)At least for now. We won't really know until we see how he votes in the next session.
On the other hand, Fetterman may be trolling Chump and the MAGAs so let's wait and see. Don't forget that Fetterman ran an exemplary Xwitter campaign trolling against the MAGAs while he ran for the Senate, and that was only 2 years ago.
Think. Again.
(19,028 posts)SunSeeker
(54,044 posts)The mass deportations?
Getting rid of IRS, FBI, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau?
Stacking the courts with even more Republicans?
20% tariffs across the board?
Nepotism hires?
Enriching himself with taxpayer money?
Blocking any efforts to save us from climate change?
Putting us trillions of dollars in debt with tax cuts for the rich?
Privatizing the VA, post office, Medicare and Social Security?
Repealing the ACA?
Cha
(305,848 posts)Not buying what he's selling.
stopdiggin
(13,003 posts)Trying to make the best of a situation (which we will all have to do ultimately) - is not necessarily cowardice or selling out. Fetterman has never been (IMO) anything like a wordsmith or real eloquent in framing his thoughts. (and I've had some real doubts about where he's coming from on a few things in the past) But - truth is, the incoming congress is going to have dealings with the incoming administration ... Nobody on our side of the aisle is going to be speaking to anybody at State, or Homeland or Justice for the next 4 years? Just don't think that's the way it works. Nor should it.
Trump and the GOP deserve their just desserts and everything that makes its way downhill on them - but, at the same time, if that includes wishing ill on the American people in the same breath ...
It's you and not Fetterman that misses the mark.
SunSeeker
(54,044 posts)But Trump/Elon is already fucking with our country, fomenting shutdown, and if it weren't for Democrats acting like the adults in the room, we would be in government shutdown right now.
No elected Democrat is wishing "ill will on the American people."
So exactly what is the unwarranted Democratic "freakout" Fetterman is referring to?
stopdiggin
(13,003 posts)as anyone reading this board can attest to. "They're going to take my SS check!" As far as party or elected officials, that incidence is probably somewhat less (as one would hope) - but then, there are a fair number (both sides of the aisle) that are just really enamored of their own voices.
Again - I find myself in the curious position here of (rather reluctantly) defending a guy that I've had some doubts about in the past. But I tend to think this might have been more a matter of poorly chosen words (which seems fairly typical of Fetterman) - than an kind of real broadside or attack on Democrats. And with the overall intent behind the words - something more rather more benign and actually rather common sense. Just my impression here. Feel free to disagree.
SunSeeker
(54,044 posts)And invoke "both sides" bullshit to insult Dems??
stopdiggin
(13,003 posts)SunSeeker
(54,044 posts)Republicans have blocked Democrats' efforts to lift the cap on the Social Security tax, thus slowly starving the Social Security trust fund and letting the rich get away with failing to pay their fair share of Social Security taxes. https://www.8newsnow.com/news/national-news/social-security-where-do-democrats-and-republicans-stand/
Republicans want to get rid of Social Security as we know it (a defined benefit life long pension) and turn it into little more than a 401k that gambles on the stock market and does not guarantee a monthly benefit payment for life. https://www.newsweek.com/social-security-warning-donald-trump-1931868
How can you defend that?
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #52)
SunSeeker This message was self-deleted by its author.
MacKasey
(1,237 posts)45 has been using Hitler speeches as his cliff notes
It just shows how easily people can be manipulated, just like Germany in the 30s and 40s.
We need to pick our battles,
we need to walk softly and carry a big stick and another saying is keep your friends close but you keep your enemies closer so we know what the hell they're doing.
We need to be cool headed and smart and try to be one step ahead of them
I've been saying we need to do some Perot graphs and make everything easy to understand, make schoolhouse Rock videos for everything so you keep it short and simple so it's easy to understand.
Think. Again.
(19,028 posts)Linda ladeewolf
(487 posts)Save our strength for those that matter. Like ACA, Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare. food stamps.social safety nets. They need also to start campaigning from the get go for 2028 and throw enough monkey wrenches into the mix to slow down the orange dozer. They need to put up billboards beside every single infrastructure project resulting from Bidens bill si trump doesnt get the credit. These are also small acts of defiance.
MacKasey
(1,237 posts)GiqueCee
(1,501 posts)... think long and hard about what you say next. Support for Trump is NOT [i]NOT synonymous with support for the country, by any stretch of the imagination. I, for one, fully support the office of the presidency, but not the malevolent dipshit about to defile that august position. Trump is the antithesis of everything a president should be.
Get your head on straight, son.
Think. Again.
(19,028 posts)Nah.
(Hey fetterman, your roots are showing.)
RockRaven
(16,526 posts)TCF says and does, often seen on cable news and clickbait grifter YouTube and social media posts, it does not follow that anyone ought to be rooting for TCF to "succeed" because TCF does not have goals which are aligned with either morality or the law. Rooting for TCF to succeed is to root for immoral acts and criminality.
Rooting against TCF is rooting for the nation: for general prosperity not only the already rich, for decency not depraved abuse, for lawfulness not scofflaws and bandits, for a non-dystopian future.
uncledad
(64 posts)I agree with the part about not freaking out and the constant hand wringing before Stump is even inaugurated. But to say you want Stump to be successful is just plain ignorant. If he doesn't understand what successful looks like for Stump (political revenge, destroying the executive branch, end of environmental regulations, tax cuts for the top 1%, Russia running wild in Eastern Europe, and much worse) then he's got his head up his ass. If Trump is successful the country is fucked.
sop
(11,569 posts)"Fetterman supports taxpayer-funded drug dens and the complete decriminalization of illegal drugs, including heroin, cocaine, crystal meth, and ultra lethal fentanyl," Trump said. "By the way, he takes them himself."
"Following the speech, Fetterman's campaign released a statement saying in part, 'more and more lies from Trump and Dr. Oz, another day, but it's the same crap from these two desperate and sad dudes.'
https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/by-the-way-he-takes-them-himself-former-president-trump-accuses-fetterman-of-abusing-drugs/
Don't forget, Trump is rooting against you, Senator Fetterman.
Bread and Circuses
(235 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,641 posts)global1
(25,957 posts)uncledad
(64 posts)LudwigPastorius
(11,065 posts)when Trump fails, our country wins. (...and vice versa)
boonecreek
(163 posts)I promise I won't root against Trump.
But I'll hope against him for all I'm worth.
NotHardly
(1,363 posts)Cirsium
(1,151 posts)"If you're rooting against the president, you are rooting against the nation." Fetterman
Trump = the country?
"When the president does it, that means it is not illegal." - Richard Nixon
For more than a week, House managers prosecuting the impeachment case against Trump have argued that the Senates failure to convict him would make Trump an unaccountable leader; in effect, a dictator or a king. When Dershowitz spoke, it was as if he completely agreed with them. Two days earlier, Dershowitz had told senators that Presidential abuse of power should not be considered an impeachable offense under the Constitution. On Wednesday, he took that furthermuch further. If a President does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment, he argued. Dershowitz was offering Trumpand all future Presidentsa free pass. His argument seemed unbelievable: as long as the President thinks his reëlection will benefit the country, he can do anything in pursuit of it without fear of impeachment. Really?
Trump has already said that he considers himself empowered by Article II of the Constitution to do whatever I want. Video of this extraordinary moment has been played, repeatedly, by House managers in the trial. They clearly saw it as a damning statement made by a power-grabbing Presidentand then the Presidents counsel, in effect, endorsed Trumps power grab on the floor of the Senate. So long as Trump believes himself to be acting in the national interest, Dershowitz said, he can do whatever he wants. If the past three years have taught us anything, it is that Trump is a President who is comfortable conflating his own interest with the national interest. Létat, cest Trump.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-trumps-washington/alan-dershowitz-for-the-defense-letat-cest-trump
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/at-halftime-of-the-trump-presidency-the-resistance-is-winning
Pris
(7 posts)Fetterman is wrong.
Trump incited insurrection against the Capitol
Trump vows to seek retribution against his "enemies" by using our justice department
Trump ran for office by saying this would be the last election people would have
Trump seeks approval by Vladimir Putin - a man who actually does rig elections and puts people in jail who criticize him
Senator Fetterman is so wrong he needs to be elected OUT of office.
He clearly can't be trusted.