Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(144,187 posts)
Sat Dec 14, 2024, 04:45 AM Dec 14

Justices agree to hear dispute over California emissions rules

Source: Roll Call

Posted December 13, 2024 at 5:22pm


The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear a case seeking to challenge California’s ability to set tighter car emissions standards than the EPA. The challenge from a group of energy companies and trade groups is to the agency’s waiver giving California the ability to set tighter standards than the rest of the country under the law known as the Clean Air Act. The case is part of a long-running legal battle over California’s ability to set its own environmental standards.

The justices on Friday granted review of only part of the challenge: over whether the companies and trade groups can continue their case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit had previously tossed it. The high court will likely issue a decision before the end of the court’s term in June. Several states are separately asking the Supreme Court to take their own case against California’s waiver. The justices have yet to say whether they will do so.

The case now on the Supreme Court’s docket — Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. EPA — has its roots in the state’s latest emissions plan, which received the latest EPA waiver in 2022. The state readopted fuel emissions standards under the waiver that runs through 2025. The agency gave an initial waiver in 2013, but the Trump administration revoked it in 2019.

The challengers argued that climate change is not a uniquely California problem, and that the legal waiver portion of the clean air statute is meant to allow the state to set its own standards to handle unique pollution problems.

Read more: https://rollcall.com/2024/12/13/justices-agree-to-hear-dispute-over-california-emissions-rules/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justices agree to hear dispute over California emissions rules (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Dec 14 OP
Good intent, bad precident manicdem Dec 14 #1
LOL azureblue Dec 14 #2
I wouldn't count on that if this goes to SCOTUS. The Mouth Dec 14 #3
This is the Court that overthrew Roe vs Wade and gutted the Voting Rights Act... Hekate Dec 14 #4

manicdem

(508 posts)
1. Good intent, bad precident
Sat Dec 14, 2024, 08:12 AM
Dec 14

While it's a good thing California is trying to help the environment I see bad things coming from this. If a state can get waived from federal register to do good things, then a state can also be waived to do bad things.

azureblue

(2,325 posts)
2. LOL
Sat Dec 14, 2024, 10:09 AM
Dec 14

Totally ignoring precedent - long ago CA set its own air quality rules. The car companies and the fed fought it, but lost. And there is nothing the courts can do to stop CA, either.

The Mouth

(3,304 posts)
3. I wouldn't count on that if this goes to SCOTUS.
Sat Dec 14, 2024, 02:19 PM
Dec 14

CARB and the Coastal Commission have a lot of enemies.

Hekate

(95,281 posts)
4. This is the Court that overthrew Roe vs Wade and gutted the Voting Rights Act...
Sat Dec 14, 2024, 04:02 PM
Dec 14

On the one hand, they seem to be keen on States’ Rights — on the other hand, if states are opposing things like Big Oil running roughshod over the people… Well, see my title above.

I don’t trust this Court.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justices agree to hear di...