Republicans take aim at subsidies that help tens of millions of women
Source: The Guardian
Fri 13 Dec 2024 11.00 EST
As they prepare to take control of the White House and Congress next month, conservatives are eyeing cutbacks to federal programs that help tens of millions of women pay for healthcare, food, housing and transportation. Slashing or overhauling social support programs, long a goal of Republican lawmakers, could be catastrophic for women experiencing poverty.
Supporters contend the social safety-net programs are already grossly underfunded. With this new administration that is coming in
I really am concerned about the lives of women. We are seeing so many policies, so many budget cuts, said Christian Nunes, president of the National Organization for Women.
Republicans say they want to keep campaign promises to cut government spending, and three major programs make easy targets: Medicaid, the joint state/federal health insurance program for people with lower incomes; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), a cash-allowance program that replaced welfare; and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), widely known as food stamps.
While conservatives frame cuts as making government more efficient and even restoring freedom, advocates for and experts on families with little or no income say reducing these programs will throw more people especially women and children further into poverty. It is going to fall heavily on women, said Elaine Waxman, a senior fellow in the Income and Benefits Policy Center at the Urban Institute, a non-profit research organization.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/13/republicans-social-welfare-programs-aid-cuts
Traildogbob
(10,256 posts)The Fossil fuel, Pharma and CEO subsidies though. Not a measly tens of millions, theirs are tens of billions. Leave those alone. Lets see here, what is it 11-12 billionaires so far put into the cabinets that make those cuts.
What can go wrong, Freedom. Lock HER up!!!
JoetheShow
(94 posts)It has never been a secret about the priorities of the top 0.5%. And the majority of voters obviously wanted this. I hope it will make them happy.
CrispyQ
(38,713 posts)Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Post removed
TexasBushwhacker
(20,777 posts)recipients of public aid, but my guess is the actual numbers are predominantly white.
Hekate
(95,569 posts)He tried to bring white Americas attention to the fact that, by numbers, there were more white people in poverty than Black.
lostnfound
(16,763 posts)Hekate
(95,569 posts)GB_RN
(3,250 posts)Not so much. But a plurality identity as white.
From a 2023 article by Pew Research, using Census Bureau data:
Granny Blue
(39 posts)This old white woman and DH proudly voted a straight Blue ticket, as we have every chance we got since we reached adulthood. We dont deserve that language!
Hekate
(95,569 posts)Welcome to DU, Granny Blue.