Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,075 posts)
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 06:49 PM Dec 13

Republicans take aim at subsidies that help tens of millions of women

Source: The Guardian

Fri 13 Dec 2024 11.00 EST


As they prepare to take control of the White House and Congress next month, conservatives are eyeing cutbacks to federal programs that help tens of millions of women pay for healthcare, food, housing and transportation. Slashing or overhauling social support programs, long a goal of Republican lawmakers, could be catastrophic for women experiencing poverty.

Supporters contend the social safety-net programs are already grossly underfunded. “With this new administration that is coming in … I really am concerned about the lives of women. We are seeing so many policies, so many budget cuts,” said Christian Nunes, president of the National Organization for Women.

Republicans say they want to keep campaign promises to cut government spending, and three major programs make easy targets: Medicaid, the joint state/federal health insurance program for people with lower incomes; Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), a cash-allowance program that replaced welfare; and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), widely known as food stamps.

While conservatives frame cuts as making government more efficient and even restoring freedom, advocates for and experts on families with little or no income say reducing these programs will throw more people – especially women and children – further into poverty. “It is going to fall heavily on women,” said Elaine Waxman, a senior fellow in the Income and Benefits Policy Center at the Urban Institute, a non-profit research organization.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/13/republicans-social-welfare-programs-aid-cuts

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans take aim at subsidies that help tens of millions of women (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Dec 13 OP
Just don't touch Traildogbob Dec 13 #1
Politics is about making choices. You can keep giving money to "useless eaters" or help "job creaters". JoetheShow Dec 13 #2
I hate these people. CrispyQ Dec 13 #3
Post removed Post removed Dec 13 #4
Women of color may be disproportionately TexasBushwhacker Dec 13 #5
I think you would be right. Just before he was assassinated, Dr King turned his attention to poverty... Hekate Dec 13 #8
No they don't. You have no proof of "overwhelming numbers". Nt lostnfound Dec 13 #6
It's a play for division. TY for calling it out. Hekate Dec 13 #9
Overwhelming Numbers? GB_RN Dec 13 #11
Call for stereotyping! Granny Blue Dec 13 #7
Exactly the same here. Thanks for calling out this divisive stereotype for what it is. Hekate Dec 13 #10
Kick ck4829 Dec 16 #12

Traildogbob

(10,256 posts)
1. Just don't touch
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 07:14 PM
Dec 13

The Fossil fuel, Pharma and CEO subsidies though. Not a measly tens of millions, theirs are tens of billions. Leave those alone. Let’s see here, what is it 11-12 billionaires so far put into the cabinets that make those cuts.
What can go wrong, “Freedom”. Lock HER up!!!

JoetheShow

(94 posts)
2. Politics is about making choices. You can keep giving money to "useless eaters" or help "job creaters".
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 07:20 PM
Dec 13

It has never been a secret about the priorities of the top 0.5%. And the majority of voters obviously wanted this. I hope it will make them happy.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

TexasBushwhacker

(20,777 posts)
5. Women of color may be disproportionately
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 09:13 PM
Dec 13

recipients of public aid, but my guess is the actual numbers are predominantly white.

Hekate

(95,569 posts)
8. I think you would be right. Just before he was assassinated, Dr King turned his attention to poverty...
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 10:13 PM
Dec 13

He tried to bring white America’s attention to the fact that, by numbers, there were more white people in poverty than Black.

GB_RN

(3,250 posts)
11. Overwhelming Numbers?
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 11:00 PM
Dec 13

Not so much. But a plurality identity as white.

From a 2023 article by Pew Research, using Census Bureau data:

Non-Hispanic White people accounted for 44.6% of adult SNAP recipients and 31.5% of child recipients in 2020. About 27% of both adult and child recipients were Black. Hispanic people, who can be of any race, accounted for 21.9% of adult recipients and 35.8% of child recipients.

Granny Blue

(39 posts)
7. Call for stereotyping!
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 09:51 PM
Dec 13

This old white woman and DH proudly voted a straight Blue ticket, as we have every chance we got since we reached adulthood. We don’t deserve that language!

Hekate

(95,569 posts)
10. Exactly the same here. Thanks for calling out this divisive stereotype for what it is.
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 10:17 PM
Dec 13

Welcome to DU, Granny Blue.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Republicans take aim at s...