Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(144,243 posts)
Wed Dec 4, 2024, 05:51 PM Dec 4

Trump energy nominee misinterprets studies to support claims, scientists say

Source: Washington Post

Today at 6:00 a.m. EST


Oil executive Chris Wright, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Energy Department, accepts that burning fossil fuel is warming the planet, but departs from the mainstream over the consequences, contending that there is no climate crisis.

Wright cites scientific studies to argue that global warming “alarmists,” as he calls the majority of climate scientists, have it all wrong. He rattles off data to support his contention that a warmer Earth has reduced deaths from cold weather. And he points to published research to assert that hurricanes and other major storms are not growing in intensity, despite observations by meteorologists.

The references to scientific research make his arguments seem more compelling, but the authors of those studies told The Washington Post in interviews that Wright has misrepresented their work.

“What he is saying is flat out wrong,” said Jim Kossin, a climate and atmospheric scientist who was an author of a section of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report about dangerous weather that Wright cited in a recent video on LinkedIn. Other researchers accused Wright of cherry-picking bits of data to support his thesis while ignoring abundant evidence of climate dangers.


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/12/04/trump-energy-climate-nominee-chris-wright/



No paywall (gift)
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump energy nominee misinterprets studies to support claims, scientists say (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Dec 4 OP
Misinterpreted, a mistake, or lied, or doesn't give a shit? sakabatou Dec 4 #1
All the same when it comes to pushing pseudoscience and quackery. Karasu Dec 4 #7
Heat is the #1 weather killer.... Dumbass!! n/t Cheezoholic Dec 4 #2
This is obviously another case of scientists lying to us. groundloop Dec 4 #3
This will be the hallmark of the Trump Administration, version 2.0 Aussie105 Dec 4 #4
When you get your "science" education from JPEGs you saw on social media ThoughtCriminal Dec 4 #5
That's what you get... DivByZero Dec 4 #6

groundloop

(12,386 posts)
3. This is obviously another case of scientists lying to us.
Wed Dec 4, 2024, 06:31 PM
Dec 4


(just in case someone misunderstands..... )

Aussie105

(6,472 posts)
4. This will be the hallmark of the Trump Administration, version 2.0
Wed Dec 4, 2024, 06:38 PM
Dec 4

You start with a conclusion that fits well for you, then work backwards to juggle the facts to fit in.

Reverse Scientific Process, in other words.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,351 posts)
5. When you get your "science" education from JPEGs you saw on social media
Wed Dec 4, 2024, 07:37 PM
Dec 4

And OMG, here's a video of a windmill on fire!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump energy nominee misi...