Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,238 posts)
Sat Nov 23, 2024, 05:09 PM Nov 23

'Completely fails': Central Park Five say Trump's attorney cited the wrong law in effort to dismiss defamation case

Source: Law & Crime

Nov 23rd, 2024, 11:20 am


The Central Park Five say President-elect Donald Trump is wrong on the law as he seeks to dismiss their defamation lawsuit against him over comments made during the presidential debate earlier this year.

In a letter motion filed in a Pennsylvania federal court on Friday, attorneys for the famously falsely-accused quintet said they “intend to oppose Defendant’s forthcoming Motion to Dismiss in its entirety.”

On Nov. 20, Trump requested a conference in anticipation of filing a motion to dismiss based on a failure to state a claim under the federal rules and the Keystone State’s anti-SLAPP statute — a state law that bars actions intended to chill free speech. Many states refer to such litigation as strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP) and have created an easy vehicle to dismiss them at the outset.

Attorneys for the Central Park Five, however, say Trump’s attorney incorrectly invoked the anti-SLAPP law. “Defendant invokes Pennsylvania’s anti-SLAPP statute,” the motion reads. “While the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet spoken on this issue, district courts within the Third Circuit have concluded that state anti-SLAPP statutes do not apply in federal court.”

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/completely-fails-central-park-five-say-trumps-attorney-cited-the-wrong-law-in-effort-to-dismiss-defamation-case-insist-debate-comments-were-fabricated-from-whole-cloth/



Full headline: ‘Completely fails’: Central Park Five say Trump’s attorney cited the wrong law in effort to dismiss defamation case, insist debate comments were ‘fabricated from whole cloth’

Link to LETTER MOTION (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.paed.628885/gov.uscourts.paed.628885.23.0.pdf
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Completely fails': Central Park Five say Trump's attorney cited the wrong law in effort to dismiss defamation case (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Nov 23 OP
Forget Pam Bondi; there's our next attorney general. NT mahatmakanejeeves Nov 23 #1
Who is surprised by this? LetMyPeopleVote Nov 24 #2
Somewhat misleading headline from LawandCrime. onenote Nov 24 #3

onenote

(44,863 posts)
3. Somewhat misleading headline from LawandCrime.
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 04:22 PM
Nov 24

The plaintiff's counsel never says that Trump's attorney "cited the wrong law". Rather they suggest that other district courts in Pennsylvania have held that anti-SLAPP laws can't be applied in federal court cases, but also acknowledge that the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet spoken on the issue. Which means that this district court is not bound to follow the other district courts.

Indeed, the appeals courts that have addressed the issue are divided. The first, second, and ninth court of appeals have ruled that state anti-SLAPP laws can be applied in federal court cases. The 5th, 10th, 11th and DC Circuits have held anti-SLAPP laws cannot be applied in federal court. Under the circumstances, there was nothing "wrong" in arguing that the anti-SLAPP law applies in this case, although I would hope the court follows the cases that have held it is not applicable.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Completely fails': Centr...