She seems pro-business. This is the problem. We appoint normal people at judges, they appoint crazy loons who don't care about the law.

"In 2023, Corley oversaw the lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to block the acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft. In June 2023, Corley disclosed that her son was working for Microsoft at the time of the trial, which led judicial watchdog group the Revolving Door Project to issue an open letter to Corley arguing that her son's employment at Microsoft could create the "appearance of improper incentives" and might violate the federal Code of Conduct for US judges.[13] In July 2023, Corley ruled that the FTC hadn't proven that the deal would harm consumers. The case is still pending appeal and is yet to have a final verdict."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacqueline_Scott_Corley

Maybe we should start raising money to buy our own judges.

You know, buy a judge to actually do their damn jobs and enforce rule of law.

the amount for an Attorney General seems to be $25,000.

Doesn't cost much to buy these people.

They go strictly by the law.

We saw it with our own eyes.

I assure you most of us here on DU are not stupid, contrary to your accusations.

We know a good or bad ruling when we see it.
And we have the capacity to make case by case decisions.

I don't care who appointed who.
We can tell the difference between good rulings and utter bullshit.

she ruled because I would have taken immense pride in going to jail for standing up and saying to her "Well of course your honor and please forgive us citizens for all these years failing to understand that court dates aren't requirements but are mere suggestions."

It really does feel like most all judges left in this country are toothless cowards or willfully compromised.

That's equivalent to me paying 9/10,000ths of one cent to get the SEC to drop sanctions.