Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(144,257 posts) Sun Nov 17, 2024, 06:46 PM Nov 17

Johnson doesn't rule out use of recess appointments

Source: Axios

6 hours ago

House Speaker Mike Johnson said "there may be a function" to facilitate the use of recess appointments to speed up the confirmation of President-elect Trump's Cabinet nominees.

Why it matters: The process of adjourning the Senate to allow Trump to install his picks without congressional approval would mean the chamber would shirk its advice-and-consent role for cabinet confirmations.

The president-elect demanded ahead of the Senate Republican leader race — from which Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) emerged victorious — that any senator seeking the position must agree to recess appointments, "without which we will not be able to get people confirmed in a timely manner."
Thune has expressed willingness to use the tool, saying "all options are on the table."

Driving the news: Johnson did not rule out the use of recess appointments in a "Fox News Sunday" interview, saying, "We'll have to see how it plays out."

He pointed to "a very partisan atmosphere" in Washington that he believes could hinder the process of Senate confirmations, adding, "If this thing bogs down, it would be a great detriment ... to the American people."
If the Senate refuses to recess but the House does, Trump would have the power to adjourn the entire Congress, Axios' Ivana Saric reports.

The big picture: Congressional scholars have warned circumventing the traditional confirmation process would inflate executive power by sidestepping checks and balances.

Johnson says he's "sympathetic" to opposition to Trump's proposal, saying he's "very hopeful the Senate will do its job."

But he criticized "hyperbole" about the plan as an attempt to "distract the American people and to try to stall President Trump in delivering upon that mandate ... the people have given him."

The House of Representatives has ZERO to do with "appointments" and "confirmations". Their only involvement would potentially be to align their new Rules for the 119th Congress with the Senate's Rules, to allow for an actual "Recess" for "appointment purposes" (something that hasn't been done in 20 years).

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Johnson doesn't rule out use of recess appointments (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Nov 17 OP

The fucker is just waiting for his orders bluestarone Nov 17 #1

Not up to you, MiJo MadLinguist Nov 17 #2

"delivering upon that mandate ... the people have given him" I guess 0.8% is a "mandate" now. PSPS Nov 17 #3

I'd just to go on record that I think the jet stream should continue underpants Nov 17 #4

Article II Sec 3 angrychair Nov 17 #5

I have seen some other reports citing that section BumRushDaShow Nov 17 #7

Thank you for the info angrychair Nov 18 #11

They won the House, Senate and White House AND they STILL NEED TO CHEAT! ZonkerHarris Nov 17 #6

Uh... slightlv Nov 17 #8

Recess appointments declare war on Trump's own Republican majority bucolic_frolic Nov 18 #9

Of course he doesn't. He's a bad person. travelingthrulife Nov 18 #10

bluestarone

(18,405 posts)

1. The fucker is just waiting for his orders

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 06:51 PM

Nov 17

God Dam i hate these fuckeras And people wonder why we think (KNOW) they CHEAT

MadLinguist

(850 posts)

2. Not up to you, MiJo

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 06:54 PM

Nov 17

Wave your little gavel around, pretend you talking to your pinky promise son, whatever you need to keep that placid pale face intact, but it just ain't your call. Ain't nobody asking you to open your mouth and opine, MiJo

PSPS

(14,195 posts)

3. "delivering upon that mandate ... the people have given him" I guess 0.8% is a "mandate" now.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 07:01 PM

Nov 17

underpants

(187,387 posts)

4. I'd just to go on record that I think the jet stream should continue

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 07:23 PM

Nov 17

because I have as much impact on that as he does on the Senate.

angrychair

(9,900 posts)

5. Article II Sec 3

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 08:09 PM

Nov 17

The part about adjournment of Congress if House were to adjourn but the Senate refused it appears to give the president the power to adjourn Congress and restart it when he sees "proper"

convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;

So does that mean what it sounds like? That the president can close Congress and just not reopen it? That seems insane. Why would they give a president that kind of power? It would leave Congress powerless.vthry couldn't even impeach him because they aren't in session.

BumRushDaShow

(144,257 posts)

7. I have seen some other reports citing that section

Reply to angrychair (Reply #5)

Sun Nov 17, 2024, 09:10 PM

Nov 17

And the fuller section is below with a critical criteria highlighted -

Article II

Section 3.

(snip)

he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper;

(snip)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii

In the above situation "extraordinary" tended to associate with declarations of war or some other calamity.

But one could bring up a more practical reason, which was probably more frequent in the centuries past - i.e., issues with transportation to the U.S. Capitol, from remote states (not even counting weather delays).

So for example, if one Chamber didn't have a quorum of members present to vote on a Recess or Adjournment when the other Chamber wanted to and was ready to do so, but couldn't (because both need to agree to do it at the same time), then the President could step in and do it for them.

I.e., that provision should NOT be something assumed to have been included there to "game the system" and jam in nominees.

Plus another question might be the terminology between "Recess" and "Adjournment", where the latter is usually done at the end of a Calendar year or sometimes during a summer break. I think there is something about "10 days before the end of the year" (which corresponds to the "pocket veto" timeframe) and/or at the end of a Congressional Session". I.e., it has more "finality" to it, whereas "Recess" is more a temporary thing.