Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(144,234 posts)
Mon Nov 11, 2024, 05:24 PM Nov 11

White House pushes back on Trump call to halt confirmations in lame duck period

Source: The Hill

11/11/24 4:13 PM ET


A White House spokesperson on Monday pushed back on President-elect Trump’s demand that the Democratic Senate stop confirming judges during the lame-duck period before he takes office and the upper chamber flips to GOP control.

Senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates in a statement pointed to past precedent and the “real-life toll” such a pause would take on constituents to reject Trump’s request, which he posted over the weekend on social media.

“Regardless of party, the American people expect their leaders to prioritize the rule of law and ensuring the criminal justice system can function effectively in every state,” Bates said in a statement to The Hill. “Delaying the confirmation of strongly qualified, experienced judges takes a real-life toll on constituents and leads to backlogs of criminal cases — meaning there is every urgent reason for Republicans and Democrats to continue working together in good faith to staff the federal bench.”

Bates noted that the then-GOP-led Senate confirmed 55 nominee during the lame duck period of Trump’s first term after President Biden had won the 2020 election, including 18 judges. “There is no excuse for choosing partisanship over enforcing the rule of law,” Bates said.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4984559-white-house-trump-lame-duck-judicial-confirmations-senate/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bucolic_frolic

(47,607 posts)
2. GOPee will choose not to hear any of that
Mon Nov 11, 2024, 05:36 PM
Nov 11

Just like Trump's impeachments. And we can't reciprocate the dictatorship now. So we're powerless.

kysrsoze

(6,175 posts)
3. I'm confused. What's preventing them from saying "tough shit," and moving along with it. We still run the Senate.
Mon Nov 11, 2024, 05:51 PM
Nov 11

As long as we can get Manchin and Sinema to play along, what prevents them from just moving forward? We all know they're going to ramrod the biggest shitheads, and likely two replacements for Thomas and Alito, once they take over.

BumRushDaShow

(144,234 posts)
4. "What's preventing them from saying "tough shit," and moving along with it."
Mon Nov 11, 2024, 06:04 PM
Nov 11

Remember this guy? There are others just like him in the Senate.

kysrsoze

(6,175 posts)
6. That was for military promotions, not judge appointments. Are you 100% sure it's the same rule...
Mon Nov 11, 2024, 10:40 PM
Nov 11

that a single person can hold up all voting on judges? Seems to me if that was the case, we wouldn't have has any confirmed during this term.

BumRushDaShow

(144,234 posts)
7. Remember that the Judiciary Committee has almost equal numbers of Senators from each party
Tue Nov 12, 2024, 06:28 AM
Nov 12

and here is who you are dealing with for (R) members on the Judiciary Committee who would need to vote with Democrats to send nominees out of Committee - https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/members

Chuck Grassley
John Cornyn
Mike Lee
Ted Cruz
Josh Hawley
Tom Cotton
John Kennedy
Thom Tillis
Marsha Blackburn

You also have a situation that was mentioned here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219704986

and the impact of the Senate "Blue Slip" - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=19706093

Turtle did away with the "Blue Slip" (basically ignoring them) back in 2017 in order to help ram through judges but when Democrats took the Senate again in 2020, they brought that "tradition" back.

ETA - and then there is this - SENATE CONSERVATIVES ANNOUNCE SWEEPING HOLD POLICY ON BIDEN LAWFARE NOMINEES

ancianita

(38,879 posts)
5. To the GOP it's all bluster & they're solidly united in not letting any of the 17 current nominations get to the floor.
Mon Nov 11, 2024, 08:11 PM
Nov 11
Many of the pending nominees have been ready for floor votes for months due to unified GOP opposition.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/11/politics/biden-senate-democrats-judicial-nominees/index.html
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House pushes back o...