Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A federal judge has temporarily blocked any further action involving Trump's $1.776 billion fund (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Friday OP
Federal judge halts work on Trump's 'anti-weaponization fund' LetMyPeopleVote Friday #1
MaddowBlog-Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration's 'slush fund' from advancing LetMyPeopleVote Friday #2
Gleeful Nicolle Wallace details Trump's 'humiliating' day in court: 'Hits keep coming' LetMyPeopleVote 6 hrs ago #3

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,677 posts)
1. Federal judge halts work on Trump's 'anti-weaponization fund'
Fri May 29, 2026, 09:57 AM
Friday

No one trusts trump or Blanche not to fund this slush fund and pay the money to trump

Federal judge halts work on Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization fund’

https://fascinating.news/r/RNhvXoXG

Fascinating News 🇺🇸 (@fascinating-us.bsky.social) 2026-05-29T13:42:01.527Z


https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/29/politics/federal-judge-halts-work-on-trumps-anti-weaponization-fund

A federal judge in Virginia has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from moving ahead with plans to create a nearly $1.8 billion fund to compensate people who it says were wrongly targeted by the government in the past.

The brief order from US District Judge Leonie Brinkema says the administration cannot take any action “pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund, which includes the transferring of money to the Fund; the consideration of any claims submitted to the Fund; and the disbursing of any funds from the Fund.”

She set a hearing for June 12 to hear arguments over whether she should issue a more lasting pause on the government’s efforts to set up the fund, which is being challenged by a diverse coalition of people and entities who say they would be ineligible to receive money from it.

CNN has reached out to the White House for comment.

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,677 posts)
2. MaddowBlog-Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration's 'slush fund' from advancing
Fri May 29, 2026, 08:22 PM
Friday

Opponents of the initiative last week took the fight to the courts. On Friday, one of the cases led to an order the White House probably won’t like.

This morning’s court order is temporary, but for now, Team Trump can’t:
- create or operate its slush fund
- transfer any money to the slush fund
- consider any claims
- cut any checks to anyone
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-05-29T14:05:04.268Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/federal-judge-temporarily-blocks-trump-administrations-slush-fund-from-advancing

U.S. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema temporarily blocked the administration from advancing its plan to create the fund, issuing a two-page order preventing Team Trump “from taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund, which includes the transferring of money to the Fund; the consideration of any claims submitted to the Fund; and the disbursing of any funds from the Fund.”

To be sure, this is merely a preliminary step, which is unrelated to the underlying merits. For all intents and purposes, the judge (a Clinton appointee) decided to maintain the status quo until the court can hear additional arguments.

That said, it was also of interest to see a footnote in the court order, in which the judge noted that the administration failed to provide assurances that it would hold off on disbursing funds until the court had a chance to weigh in on the motion for preliminary relief. She quoted this section from the plaintiffs’ motion:

At the time of this filing, government counsel was unable, however, to provide assurances of how long that status quo would last — including declining Plaintiffs’ request that the government commit to not transferring money to the Fund or processing or paying claims until at least June 19 to allow for less compressed briefing in this case.

Brinkema’s order set a court hearing for June 12, at which point she’ll consider additional steps.

trump and his corrupt DOJ appears to have been planning to fund this slush fund. This ruling made me smile.

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,677 posts)
3. Gleeful Nicolle Wallace details Trump's 'humiliating' day in court: 'Hits keep coming'
Sat May 30, 2026, 08:22 PM
6 hrs ago

This made me smile

President Donald Trump has been having a very bad day in court — and MS NOW's Nicolle Wallace barely managed to contain her glee reporting on his losses.

Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-05-30T02:31:18Z

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-losses-2676973997/

President Donald Trump has been having a very bad day in court — and MS NOW's Nicolle Wallace barely managed to contain her glee reporting on his losses.

"The legal hits keep coming," said Wallace. "Today, earlier, a federal judge out of Virginia ruled that DOJ's so-called 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' must freeze and that no money can be disbursed until she hears a motion challenging the fund's very existence."

Then, she noted, just hours later, a different federal judge "permanently blocked Trump from adding his name to the Kennedy Center," demanding that any name other than Kennedy be removed from the signage and promotional material within two weeks, and putting the planned two-year renovation on hold as well.

Wallace then turned to her panel, focusing on New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush. "There's the humiliating aspect to these stories for these came up ... there's all of the losing. I mean, what is left in terms of legal acumen in the Department of Justice if they can't win a case?"

Thrush argued that, privately, even a lot of people in the Trump administration were hoping for the "weaponization" slush fund to get killed in court.

"There are people, political appointees in the Justice Department and in the White House who are really, really happy, or would be very happy, if this thing died a quiet judicial death so that they were not forced to defend it" — especially considering Senate Republicans who feel "newly liberated from Donald Trump" are "antithetical" to the plan and had been drafting legislation to stop it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A federal judge has tempo...