General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump administration to give weapons-grade plutonium to private companies
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/26/climate/plutonium-nuclear-weapons-fuel.htmlU.S. Seeks to Give Weapons-Grade Plutonium to Start-Ups for Fuel
Companies say its a better way to dispose of the Cold War-era material and fix a shortage of nuclear fuel. But the plan has also faced criticism from nonproliferation experts.
By Brad Plumer
May 26, 2026 Updated 3:10 p.m. ET
The Trump administration is moving forward with a plan to provide Cold War-era plutonium from dismantled nuclear warheads to companies that want to convert the dangerous material into fuel for nuclear power plants.
The plan has generated debate and some unease among nonproliferation experts. If finalized, it would mark the first time the U.S. government has made weapons-grade plutonium available to private companies. The Energy Department has more than 50 tons of surplus plutonium left over from nuclear weapons programs, and the agency had previously been planning to dilute much of that material and bury it.
On Tuesday, the Energy Department said that it had selected five companies to enter into advanced negotiations to potentially receive some surplus plutonium. That includes Oklo, a California-based nuclear power company, which plans to partner with Newcleo, a European developer of advanced nuclear reactors.
Using plutonium for fuel, Oklo and Newcleo said, could solve a looming problem: Energy firms want to build a new wave of nuclear reactors, but the United States cant yet make enough conventional fuel from uranium to supply the plants. Harvesting old plutonium stockpiles could provide a short-term fix.
The plan has been criticized by some Democrats and nuclear nonproliferation experts, who point out that plutonium can be used to create nuclear weapons and argue that it needs extremely strict safeguards. Critics also say that past efforts by the United States and other governments to turn plutonium into fuel for reactors have faced technical difficulties and soaring costs.
...
Walleye
(45,610 posts)DFW
(60,534 posts)So, now what? Cheerios will restore your "get up and go" and make it "get up and BOOM?"
Or Exxon will put a tiger in your tank and a nuke in your living room?
La Coliniere
(2,025 posts)This is insane and another perilous decision from these assholes. Outrage # ? I stopped counting months ago.
dalton99a
(95,695 posts)doc03
(39,212 posts)underpants
(197,394 posts)I heard a really old environmental salty* on NPR years ago. He had had a turnaround and supported what I thought was old tunes from Yucca mountain. The next generation of reactors were safe he said.
Is that this?
* I dont remember his name but he was described as one of the old old guards of the environment movement.
Irish_Dem
(82,731 posts)Wounded Bear
(64,728 posts)Can't trust the current guys, for sure.
littlemissmartypants
(34,754 posts)Certainly, that moment can't be far behind this insanity.
Passages
(4,554 posts)ensure is not ever possible again.
1. President of the U.S.A: Illegal and impeachable offense to sell weapons-grade plutonium to private companies.
2. No felons in the White House.
The list will run in pages.
Emile
(43,582 posts)makes the world safer.