General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have a question about Supreme Court reform.
Let's say the Dems win the House and the Senate in November (please, whatever gods may be, let it be so), and they decide to reform the court system. They could add more District courts. They could increase the number of Supreme Court justices to thirteen, so there is one for each Federal circuit.
However, who is to say that the current Supreme Court is THE Supreme Court? The Constitution just requires "one supreme Court". Could Congress say the current Court (or a new Court of 13) is now just another appellate court with certain jurisdiction, and then say the Supreme Court sits above them and now has three or five justices.
Certainly, Congress needs to pass ethics legislation. Maybe some sort of recusal panel that can force judges to sit out decisions when there is a "sign of impropriety". There should be stricter rules about reversing existing precedent. But if you're going to reform the Court, why not go for broke?
Educate me, folks. Are there barriers to such a move? It would be delicious to watch the billions and billions that have been spent to pack the court go down the f'ing drain.
Fiendish Thingy
(24,241 posts)Once Dems have the trifecta, There is no need for convoluted legislative machinations- just expand the court to 13 (or preferably 15) seats/circuits in order to neutralize the current MAGA majority.
Other reforms should be undertaken as well, including financial and ethical reforms, but expansion must be first and foremost.
ECL213
(463 posts)is one day being in the same place we are, now.
Fiendish Thingy
(24,241 posts)It will be decades before Republicans again have the trifecta, if ever.
Dems must never govern from a fear of what republicans might do.
MichMan
(17,471 posts)How do you think they would rule?
with complete impartiality and deference to precedent, I'm sure.
lastlib
(28,711 posts)a National Court of Appeals. Congress would strip SCOTUS of all of its appellate jurisdiction, leaving it with its constitutional original jurisdiction. (see Article III). They would establish a National Court of Appeals to hear all appeals from the circuit courts and state high courts. Hopefully it would be packed with about 25 young progressive judges. Uncle Clarence could then get all his naps, and ride around in his luxury RV with almost nothing to do, and Sammy Scum could twiddle his thumbs and write nasty screeds that everyone could ignore. I rather like the idea.
ECL213
(463 posts)I'll go with that, but it still has to come with a strong ethics code. The days of a bought-and-paid-for Federal judiciary need to come to an end.
I would also like to see something like the "Missouri Plan" adopted for appointing federal judges. It's basically a nonpartisan (in theory) commission selecting multiple possible nominees for the judgeship position, and the executive (governor) choosing one of them, to be confirmed by the senate. It could be done legislatively--no constitutional amendment needed, since it would still be appointment by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Maybe that could eliminate the appointment of political hacks like Gorsuck or BeerBoy or LooseCannon.
A man can dream........