Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's post about destroying a civilization is itself a war crime FWIW
Keep in mind that Trump's threats communicated in his tweets are themselves war crimes.
— Scott Horton (@robertscotthorton.bsky.social) 2026-04-07T13:00:03.889Z
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's post about destroying a civilization is itself a war crime FWIW (Original Post)
LymphocyteLover
19 hrs ago
OP
It bears repeating: "...acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror..."
pat_k
18 hrs ago
#1
Yes-- and let's be clear that this was not the first time he did this!
LymphocyteLover
10 hrs ago
#3
pat_k
(13,426 posts)1. It bears repeating: "...acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror..."
Acts or THREATS
Department of Defense Law of War Manual (pages 189-190, left panel thumbnails 217-218)
§ 5.5.2 Essentially Negative Duties to Respect Civilians and to Refrain From Directing Military Operations Against Them. In general, military operations must not be directed against enemy civilians. In particular:
Civilians must not be made the object of attack;
Military objectives may not be attacked when the expected incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, and damage to civilian objects would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage expected to be gained;
Civilians must not be used as shields or as hostages;
Measures of intimidation or terrorism against the civilian population are prohibited, including acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population.
Civilians must not be made the object of attack;
Military objectives may not be attacked when the expected incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, and damage to civilian objects would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage expected to be gained;
Civilians must not be used as shields or as hostages;
Measures of intimidation or terrorism against the civilian population are prohibited, including acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population.
LymphocyteLover
(9,892 posts)3. Yes-- and let's be clear that this was not the first time he did this!
Skittles
(171,858 posts)2. WHY is tweeting war threats or plans OK at ALL???
when I did government contracts for IT work no way in fucking hell could I discuss ANYTHING about it publicly OR privately, and I'm pretty sure the same holds true for everyone in the military