Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOffice of Legal Counsel arguing the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional
Talking Feds with Harry Litman
Apr 4, 2026
Harry breaks down a stunning new memo out of the Office of Legal Counsel arguing the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional. The PRA was passed in the wake of the Watergate scandal and President Nixon's attempt to hide evidence of his crimes.
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Office of Legal Counsel arguing the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional (Original Post)
struggle4progress
Saturday
OP
Deadline Legal Blog-Groups warn of risk that Trump 'will keep or destroy' presidential records
LetMyPeopleVote
5 hrs ago
#1
LetMyPeopleVote
(180,170 posts)1. Deadline Legal Blog-Groups warn of risk that Trump 'will keep or destroy' presidential records
The Justice Departments new legal interpretation, if upheld, could give the president the green light to hoard records.
Groups warn of risk that Trump âwill keep or destroyâ presidential records
— (@chitraraj.bsky.social) 2026-04-07T18:57:38.345Z
#Donaldtrump
opr.news/2a2629582604...
Download Now
s.opr.news/cc0e61fa2bal
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/groups-warn-of-risk-that-trump-will-keep-or-destroy-presidential-records
As of this moment, the Administration believes that the President is legally free to destroy records of his official government conduct, or even spirit away the records for his own future personal use.
Thats what two nonprofit groups told a federal court in Washington on Monday, in a legal complaint seeking a declaration that the Presidential Records Act is constitutional. The complaint was prompted by a bold new claim to the contrary by the Trump Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel.
The American Historical Association and American Oversight said in their complaint that they filed the lawsuit to stop the unconstitutional actions of the government, ensure the President and his administration abide by the recordkeeping obligations required by federal law, and to preserve the historical record that belongs to the American people, before it is forever lost.
American Oversight is one of the groups that is separately suing for the release of former special counsel Jack Smiths report on his classified documents case against President Donald Trump. The DOJ dropped Trumps federal criminal cases due to his 2024 election win, but a Trump-appointed judge has still sought to keep Smiths report secret. ....
On top of seeking a court declaration that the act is constitutional, the groups also want a ruling that the National Archives and Records Administration must comply with the act and must make relevant records publicly available as the act requires. Also among the groups requests is that Trump be barred, after his current term is up, from retaining, destroying, disposing, or otherwise handling Presidential records in a manner not in accordance with the act, and to turn over all presidential records in his possession to NARA as required by the act.
The government will have an opportunity to respond in court.
Thats what two nonprofit groups told a federal court in Washington on Monday, in a legal complaint seeking a declaration that the Presidential Records Act is constitutional. The complaint was prompted by a bold new claim to the contrary by the Trump Justice Departments Office of Legal Counsel.
The American Historical Association and American Oversight said in their complaint that they filed the lawsuit to stop the unconstitutional actions of the government, ensure the President and his administration abide by the recordkeeping obligations required by federal law, and to preserve the historical record that belongs to the American people, before it is forever lost.
American Oversight is one of the groups that is separately suing for the release of former special counsel Jack Smiths report on his classified documents case against President Donald Trump. The DOJ dropped Trumps federal criminal cases due to his 2024 election win, but a Trump-appointed judge has still sought to keep Smiths report secret. ....
On top of seeking a court declaration that the act is constitutional, the groups also want a ruling that the National Archives and Records Administration must comply with the act and must make relevant records publicly available as the act requires. Also among the groups requests is that Trump be barred, after his current term is up, from retaining, destroying, disposing, or otherwise handling Presidential records in a manner not in accordance with the act, and to turn over all presidential records in his possession to NARA as required by the act.
The government will have an opportunity to respond in court.
This act was passed to stop Nixon from destroying Presidential records. Like Nixon, trump will destroy all records that are not favorable to him.