In November, US District Judge Cameron Currie threw out the politically motivated, poorly written, and thinly predicated indictments of James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, because the appointment of Lindsey Halligan as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) was flatly illegal. They didn't even get as far as judges laughing at the indictments themselves where the US attorney from Baywatch tried to sound out some words she had somehow gotten a grand jury to sign off on saying Comey and James were guilty of BIG CRIMES she made up to accuse them of.

As we noted at the time, if there had been a prosecutor in THE ENTIRE BUILDING willing to sign their names on Halligan's "My First Prosecution" Dream Indictments of Comey and James, they might have survived this. Unfortunately the only people there that day were real lawyers with self-respect.

So the question was, would Halligan continue showing up for work wearing the US Attorney Barbie clothes her mom bought for her, driving her official US Attorney-mobile, clack-clack-clacking around the EDVA office and pointing at stuffed animals and saying "You're indicted!" and "Go to jail, buster!" and all other manner of things real US attorneys do? Or would she, haha, just kidding, you already know she did the thing with the stuffed animals.

An angry DOJ, the one led by incompetent windsock Attorney General Pam Bondi (who Donald Trump hates now because she is so stupid and bad at covering up the Epstein Child Rape Files), has just angrily responded to a judge's demand that they explain how it is not a false statement that Lindsey Halligan is in their courtroom wearing a hat that says "World's Best Blue Ribbon US Attorney," considering how that is factually not true. Their response? IS TOO TRUE! You see, DOJ says when that judge ruled Halligan's appointment was illegal, they only meant for those two cases.

Which makes absolute total sense, if you are an absolute total dipshit.

. . .