Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIceland next?
Seems to me at least as militarily "strategic" as Greenland, located mid-Atlantic and all that...
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iceland next? (Original Post)
Disaffected
Saturday
OP
Iceland doesn't have an existing military base or vast mineral deposits like Greenland.
Ocelot II
Saturday
#1
Ocelot II
(129,307 posts)1. Iceland doesn't have an existing military base or vast mineral deposits like Greenland.
He'd get more of a military advantage from seizing Norway, which has a border with Russia, some excellent harbors (which is why the Nazis took it over during WWII), and a whole lot of oil. Also the Nobel Peace Prize committee, which he could take hostage until they gave him the prize.
GreenWave
(12,382 posts)2. Good things rockets and airships don't exist... otherwise there is no military advantage.
methinks the liar doth lie to us again.
https://www.zmescience.com/science/geology/how-rich-is-greenland/
Oh my God!
GreenWave
(12,382 posts)3. Oops! I forgot the Iceland part.
Disaffected
(6,184 posts)4. But hey, Iceland is needed to balance out Hawaii.
Iceland guarding the eastern front and Hawaii to the west! It all makes MAGA sense...