General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI would like to ask all the people who refused to vote for Hillary Clinton
Last edited Sat Jan 10, 2026, 11:45 AM - Edit history (1)
for whatever reason in 2016, are you happy now? Is this so much better?
Thanks for nothing.
Edited to add: My comment is NOT directed toward anyone here at DU. That was not and is not my intention. I am truly sorry if it was interpreted that way. I would never disparage anyone at DU nor would I ever intentionally offend anyone here.
Please see my responses at nos. 4 and 19 for further clarification.
milestogo
(22,600 posts)I don't think anyone here refused to vote for Hillary Clinton.
MIButterfly
(2,115 posts)it was a comment regarding those in the general public who so adamently opposed her. I would never disparage anyone here and I'm sorry if it was interpreted that way.
Response to MIButterfly (Reply #4)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
regnaD kciN
(27,477 posts)intheflow
(30,013 posts)So maybe you could edit your OP to note your comment isn't directed at DUers. Because I left DU for a while in 2016-17 due to the infighting over this. During that time, this kind of post was directed at DUers. It costs you nothing to clarify your intensions in the OP.
MIButterfly
(2,115 posts)But I will edit it anyway. Thank you.
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)I didn't take it as personal criticism one bit because I wholeheartedly supported Hillary during the 2016 election and obviously knew they weren't referring to me.
Why would someone think the OP were talking about them, unless they refused to support Hillary back then?
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)orangecrush
(28,529 posts)Fetteman?
Just curious.
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)ESPECIALLY when the alternative is pure evil Republicans.
Is Fetterman the one Democrat you would defend?
orangecrush
(28,529 posts)And as vehemently as I disagree with him most of the time lately, would still vote for him to defeat a Republican.
So you see, criticism and support are not mutually exclusive.
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)orangecrush
(28,529 posts)Are not the same thing, last time I checked.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,872 posts)of someone you support. Attacking is turning that issue or policy into a purity test and drawing a line in the sand over it.
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)But either way, let's use your words -- the point still remains:
Time is limited and every minute you spend attacking criticizing Democrats is a minute Republicans thank you for your service.
Oh, and it's a minute you aren't attacking criticizing Republicans, which deserve it infinitely more so.
Ilikepurple
(437 posts)To share a variation of your cliché, but pragmatically useful, platitude, dont let our imperfections get in the way of our good. While criticism isnt always the result of critical thinking, it is an ordinary byproduct of it. I cant imagine getting anything done without it, including strategizing how best to attack the Republican platform and its effects.
SunImp
(2,618 posts)I'm sure they also give kudos to that.
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)I don't.
mr715
(2,752 posts)are our own elected officials.
sheshe2
(95,949 posts)One called Hillary a 'Cunning Stunt" ( just change the position of a few letters) and was banned.
They left DU to join Jack Pine Radicals. Manny Goldstein (PPRed) admitted to being a Repuke and a member here for 10 years.
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)Gee, I wonder where those Republican enablers slithered off to...
...or back to...

betsuni
(28,735 posts)Beloved progressive icon, "I'd vote for a woman, just not THAT woman, I'd totally vote for Elizabeth Warren" they all swore.
Immediately after Warren announced her run for president the knives were out at JPR: Hillary 2.0, corporate shill, establishment, used to be a Republican, said she was capitalist in her bones, Pocahontas, "schoolmarm" etc.
It was all like that. For nothing, knowing nothing. Only against.
Tulsi Gabbard, though, was always everyone's fav because she was just like them.
W_HAMILTON
(10,089 posts)The "you have to give someone a reason to vote FOR you, not just a reason to vote against your opponent!" crowd sure loved doing the complete opposite -- and the opponents of these self-proclaimed progressives were most often good Democrats with ACTUAL progressive accomplishments.
Case in point: Elizabeth Warren.
yardwork
(68,983 posts)I'm sure there were thousands of similar sites created by Russian trolls. The disinformation campaign in 2016 has been well documented.
The disturbing part is that hundreds of longtime DUers left here to become part of the Russian campaign against Hillary Clinton.
And some have quietly returned. Did they learn anything?
sheshe2
(95,949 posts)as did Disscussionist (I think that is what it was called).
Hmmm, I wonder.
awesomerwb1
(4,988 posts)Quite a few bernie fanatics on here still who wanted to "blow it all up" because the "the establishment" blah blah blah.
DFW
(59,747 posts)Fortunately, most of them left to form their own board, where they devolved from a combination of hate for Hillary and support for, lets say, another contender for the Democratic nomination, and became a site devoted largely to more esoteric theories. I visited the site a couple of times. As GJC might have said, veni, vidi, satis. I came, I saw, I had enough.
betsuni
(28,735 posts)Something like, "To be fair, I don't think Hillary personally pulled the trigger."
That poster probably wasn't around much longer.
Shellback Squid
(9,875 posts)the current reproach is usually directed at those who had issues with Kamala, btw, I voted and donated to both
MIButterfly
(2,115 posts)To me, there was no good reason not to vote for her, especially considering who her opponent was. And it eventually led to where we are now.
karynnj
(60,790 posts)However, the same could be said of 2000, where Gore actually won but the Supreme Court awarded it to Bush. While 911 would possibly still have happened, the response would have been different.
Had Kerry won in 2004, which could have happened if everyone who went out to vote for him could have easily and expeditiously voted in Ohio, he would have nominated 2 Supreme Court justices, not named Roberts and Alito. This would have changed the Citizens United decision and by 2008 the Supreme Court would have been 5/4 in our favor even counting Kennedy as conservative when he was really a swing vote.
You could even look at 2008. Clinton winning the Presidency would likely have changed history. How I don't know. I don't know if Clinton/ (rumored to be Bayh) would have passed healthcare. Would we still have ended up with 60 Senators even briefly? Would having Senator Obama available to run in a later open primary have made us stronger now?
You could even go back and consider whether 1992 could have led to a better result with a President Jerry Brown, Tom Harkin, Paul Tsongus (if he did not have cancer) or Mario Cuomo if he had opted to run. With Perot attacking as a libertarian and Bush looking very weak, it most likely was a Democratic year.
What I still can not intellectually or emotionally understand is how Trump won after everything we knew.
RandomNumbers
(19,070 posts)Folks here should take note. Spar in the primaries REASONABLY. Assume that any of the top 2 or 3 primary contenders WILL be the nominee - and it may not be the one you prefer.
The crap stirred up in primaries will come back to bite in the general. I know too many people IRL who had knives out for Hillary even after the primary, then grudgingly agreed to vote for her once it became clear TO THEM that she was indeed the nominee and that would not change. But it was too late to take away damage they had done in their circles of contacts who didn't understand the stakes well enough. Shorter version - they suppressed D votes in the general by their earlier success at convincing people they should "never" vote for Hillary no matter what.
Keep criticism to policies and why you prefer your preferred candidate. No amplifying CT or irrelevant bullshit against the others.
Whoever the R's put up in 2028 - it won't be TSF, and I'm not seeing it be Vance - there is no planet on which the D candidate will be worse. (unless we truly get rolled by AI gimmicks and some fascist plant somehow wins - not beyond imagination for that to happen, but extremely unlikely)
gab13by13
(31,263 posts)which I believe she did.
I would rather see articles that showed how Russia interfered in Hillary's election.
There's a cure for the next election that I am pushing for, don't run a politician for president, run a Malcoln Nance-like candidate, or even run someone like Miles Taylor who is a Republican on the Democratic ticket.
Shouldn't be any infighting then, run the toughest SOB out there.
Actual reasons why elections were lost! Im very concerned that we have yet to get a handle on what tom fuckrry Elon pulled for T! Im pretty sure that Russia tanked Hillary! How many times do we have to go back to this merciless rehashing. Im pretty sure the monster will not permit fair elections next time around. Even if the computers arent hacked who will go to the polls with ICE hanging around. This is beyond surreal! We need to be thinking about the next Presidential election and what can possibly be done at this late date to secure it!!
The first year Ohio got computerized machines I was at a poll worker training session and the Diebold tech weenie did his dog and pony show. After the class all but a few were still lingering I asked the tech if the machines were connected to the internet! He asked me in a snide way if I had seen him hook a wire to it! Now in this day and age my home computer was wireless. What a stupid reply! The director of the BOE was standing there and I wasnt about to get into it with either one of them. Well at election time I did not get asked to work the polls after working over ten years. The next year I got a card in the mail reminding me of the upcoming poll worker training. I called the office wondering why I had used my time for training last election and wasnt asked to work. The staff member said she was sure I was asked because they were short on poll workers last time. I said no I wasnt and she said she would let the director know and get back to me. I got a call from the director and asked him why I was not asked to work
.well Hope we cant have you seeding doubt on the voters. I told him to ask anyone who had worked with me and they would tell him I had integrity and that my fellow poll workers wanted me there because at the end of the day our tally would be correct. After a moment of silence he said
you can work. That is why I have zero confidence that Elon did not pull a major heist last time. We need to clean this crap up if we want to win but once again we are toooo late for 2026!!!!!
questionseverything
(11,585 posts)That count and report votes, no one can prove the truth and its illegal to handcount ballots in most states
So we live with what the republican made machines tell us
Intractable
(1,658 posts)MIButterfly
(2,115 posts)Cha
(316,893 posts)the past.. Pay Attention to our History. Not sure why anyone would want to forget it.
I certainly won't
Carry On!
iemanja
(57,407 posts)sheshe2
(95,949 posts)Manny Goldstein, WillyT and friends. WillyT, if you ever worked in MIRT has tried to come back many times. They walk among us.
Hope22
(4,483 posts)Is JPR even a thing anymore?
sheshe2
(95,949 posts)Hope22
(4,483 posts)Response to sheshe2 (Reply #18)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
MIButterfly
(2,115 posts)I was talking about people in the general population who just couldn't "in good conscience" vote for her; the people who were against her because of one issue or one little comment she made, etc.
I realize that the MSM and Republicans have demonized the Clintons for years and that's certainly a part of it, but people who should've known better stayed home or voted third party for whatever reasons they had. Those are the people I was referring to.
Skittles
(169,640 posts)oh yes
usonian
(23,608 posts)A ton has gond on since. Good and bad.
People need to get excited, either out of "The new revolutionary Democratic Party" that we are building (or else we lose everything) or just plain rage at the destruction.
Guilt can nudge, but has no power.
Who will lead? People who are leading today. You know their names because they care so damn much that they are attacking fascism rather than waiting until it's "safe" to come out.
I/we want fighters.
I/we way winners.
Silence is damn near complicity.
It's not just because people have short memories. It's that change is massive and rapid.
You can't look back.
The battle is in front of us.
SunImp
(2,618 posts)Shame the replies were pretty sane & reasonable too
usonian
(23,608 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 11, 2026, 11:13 AM - Edit history (1)
Emails, Gaza. All massively amplified by media and bots. AI makes orders of magnitude worse.
A short time ago, "undressing" apps were secretive. Musk put them in the hands of every registered user. They are NOTHING BUT ABUSIVE.
A campaign has to be an overwhelming force to counter the garbage.
With great clarity, focus and purpose.
Otherwise the others get to define us.
Again.
Then, people can't see the forest for the trees.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,872 posts)are doomed to repeat is.
They played purity politics with Clinton in 16, then did it again with Harris in 24. And there are some still doing it now with democrats.
BoycottTwitter
(100 posts)I sometimes find myself thinking about this too. If Clinton would have won we would be in a so much better place right now. Maybe we'd have universal healthcare, climate change would be addressed better, way less COVID deaths, maybe no war in Ukraine and most importantly Trump likely would have faded into obscurity and the supreme court would be normal. Also I think the economy would be working a lot better for the average person instead of the billionaires.
Sadly though this is in the past and we cannot change our past but we can learn from the past and change our actions to shape the future.
This year we must fight super hard never give up and speak out constantly and always be relentless in spreading our message and advocating FOR democrats not just being against Republicans and really doing politics to change the hearts and minds of this country. We must also teach Democrats to always vote even when a candidate isn't perfect because we agree on most issues and we will not stay home because of a single issue.
MIButterfly
(2,115 posts)I appreciate it. By the way, I like your user name!
Cha
(316,893 posts)part of that is remembering the Past and learning from it
thought crime
(1,230 posts)Hopefully including Kamala Harris.
yaesu
(9,014 posts)kimbutgar
(26,832 posts)And the religious right is responsible for this abomination in our Country,
BurnDoubt
(1,488 posts)Thats why Russia, Russia, Russia.
I hope we get our Democracy back. We clearly dont deserve it.
If we do, the FIRST thing we do should be shit-canning Citizens United, then Nationalize the Tech-Bros' Empire
Move Fast and Break Things.
Since Over-Reach is a THING now.
Elect Kamala Prez.
Appoint Hillary to the Supreme Court, even if just long enough to close the books on MAGA.
Response to BurnDoubt (Reply #25)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
betsuni
(28,735 posts)Mild-mannered Midwestern Methodist ("do all the good you can" ) whose career was helping people, first person you'd call if you needed help and the person who'd call you because she heard about a problem (like the Flint, Michigan water crisis), became so many different monsters depending on what propaganda you were targeted with and believed.
Susan Bordo (who thanks CNN's Jeffrey Toobin for being the only one publicly apologizing in 2018 for his role in the false equivalence):
"Yes, we have to 'move on' -- if that means we need to work on creating a better future. But if it means we should stop dissecting, analyzing, and critiquing how the disaster of 2016 happened, I don't agree. The fact is we should be 'relitigating' the past all the time. It's called examining history. It's called exposing mythology and unearthing truth. It's called speaking truth to the power that was -- and that still, unfortunately, is"
If examining history makes one upset and lash out... Better to deal with it so it doesn't happen again. Next election will deal with same problems, Democrats attacked from all directions and people gullibly believing it.
RandiFan1290
(6,675 posts)But I do remember the many members of PUMA that were here.
Ghost of Tom Joad
(1,435 posts)How many people, especially in Florida, voted for Ralph Nader.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,872 posts)
The Wizard
(13,593 posts)is a Putin ally who is working to undo the Western Alliance.
mcar
(45,690 posts)Many left this site in 2016 because they were not allowed to call HRC a "c" word - seriously.
I am sure they are still secure in their self-righteousness.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,872 posts)they were voting their ego. Voting your conscience requires voting for someone who you may not be 100% comfortable with but is better than the alternative.
mcar
(45,690 posts)GusBob
(8,136 posts)Skittles
(169,640 posts)orangecrush
(28,529 posts)To see Hillary Clinton speak at Mercyhurst College in Erie Pa. while she was campaigning.
I most certainly voted for her, though she wasn't my first choice.
And I will stand for no one telling me I don't have a right to criticize any Democrat if I feel it is merited.
Criticism and support ARE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
mr715
(2,752 posts)pandr32
(13,805 posts)There are people around me who are vocal about hating Dementia Don now, but I fought with them about their support for Jill Stein because they were against Hillary after Bernie didn't get the nod. I was a Hillary Clinton delegate.
When I hear these people criticize donny and this regime, particularly losing our democracy and international standing, I bristle.
Duncan Grant
(8,870 posts)Personally, there is a wave of oppression coming right at me. Its vindictive, dangerous and nearly impossible to eradicate. What benefit is it to me to whine about 2016? Do whats true for you, DUers. To each their own.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,872 posts)are doomed to repeat it. Some failed to learn from the 2000 election and repeated it in 16. Then they failed to learn from 16 and repeated it in 24.
mr715
(2,752 posts)those that fail to adapt go extinct.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,872 posts)The trick is to adapt without repeating mistakes from the past.
mr715
(2,752 posts)but we're Democrats so that is allowed. Even encouraged.
There is a very difficult balance between the imperative to learn from the past while adapting to novel conditions. As I ruminate on a lot of what I post in this community, I've wondered if "leadership" as I think of it is an awareness of this balance.
Your insight is always appreciated.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,872 posts)political or commercial, there will be those who will say 'this is the way we always did it'. And there are those who just want to throw everything old out and do things completely differently. It's always a balancing act.
mr715
(2,752 posts)as in cults or in MAGA. The past never happened, it is only the dictates of the present which project forward and backward in time infinitely. Retcons.
Xavier Breath
(6,482 posts)SunImp
(2,618 posts)There has been more lashing out at Dem/undecided voters then actually examining what happened.
questionseverything
(11,585 posts)It serves no other purpose
betsuni
(28,735 posts)ffr
(23,327 posts)Murder and shootings by federal agents on the streets of this country. This is what they brought, you un-serious people! Own it, you bastards!

Tree Lady
(13,012 posts)But the way Bernie was treated at the end. Many of his followers went ahead and voted for her like me but I know some who didn't like my grandson.
I think when we run a very progressive candidate that young people are excited about we need to try harder to win them over after the primary.
There still is a lot of posts here I see against Bernie folks and it's that type of stuff that caused people to sit out 2016.
Response to Tree Lady (Reply #68)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tree Lady
(13,012 posts)I lived in a very progressive area of CA at the time and only way I could get my grandson to vote was for Bernie.
Now years later he is one of those young disaffected males in our society. Doesnt vote thank god because it wouldnt go for us.
I just think we need to do more for the young men.
mr715
(2,752 posts)The narrative that they are a forgotten class seems to, itself, forget that they have all the power.
mr715
(2,752 posts)Sen. Sanders' appeal was that he was anti-establishment, which is sexy but meaningless.
Tree Lady
(13,012 posts)Been fighting for all his career, universal healthcare and college kids can afford and fixing the environment.
The only reason he is antiestablishment is because main stream candidates go along with for profit healthcare.
I remember when healthcare was affordable and when it was not for profit when I grew up.
It feels like more and more are being privatized for the rich to profit over us being sick or people going to jail or just keeping warm. Utility bills are so high now people cant afford to stay warm.
I had two of my roommates in college marry Canadians and now having been in Canada 50 years they are citizens, using the healthcare with no problem one in BC and one in Toronto area. Part of why I feel the way I do.
betsuni
(28,735 posts)and urging voting for the Democratic nominee?
mr715
(2,752 posts)Skittles
(169,640 posts)hating on POC and women trumps common sense and decency
Beartracks
(14,369 posts)Our job as voters is to keep pushing the government in a liberal/progressive direction, every election, and very often that means voting for candidates who we don't agree with on every single thing but who are at least pulling in the same general direction as us. To not do this means that there is one less vote being applied in that liberal/progressive direction, which grants one more vote's momentum to the side that pulls in the opposite direction. Democracy often involves relentless incrementalism, but we must be relentless at it.
=================
mr715
(2,752 posts)I am critical of my fellow Democrats, but I support them with money I don't have, time I can't spare.
We need to treat our politicians like adults - they err, they are misguided, they are corruptible. It is incumbent upon their voters to hold them to account, because we are the votes that make or break them.
There is such a thing as bad tactics. A bad tactical decision does not, by itself, lose a war. But if we fail to correct, and these tactics keep getting used, we will certainly lose the war.
This is the bunker mentality when a leader is too fragile to hear the truth. They can only hear how they are doing the right thing, their plan is perfect, wise, bulletproof.
I do not think our coalition is so fragile that it cannot handle healthy dissent from ardent supporters.
I was a Sen. Clinton diehard in 2008, but I will submit that during the campaign she used some problematic dog whistles when she got desperate to win. What did she do at the convention? She wholeheartedly, (apparently) warmly, and dramatically let her delegates to vote for Obama by acclamation.
I was a Sec. Clinton diehard in 2016. She did not receive the same courtesy, and yeah, I think it cost her the election.
VP Harris ran a perfect campaign until the phantom of Liz Cheney appeared where Tim Walz should've been.
These are my opinions. They don't make me a bad Democrat. They are the thoughts of an adult man who has invested a lot of heart and soul into politics.
Treat your party like you treat your parents as an adult. They can make mistakes, but your relationship is eternal. Bill Maher and Al Franken have both made the analogy that Democrats love their country like an adult loves their parents, while Republicans love their country like a child loves their parents.
PJMcK
(24,756 posts)If he were presented with hard evidence he was wrong about something he would simply declare it fake news, just as always.
Kid Berwyn
(23,030 posts)
Prescott Bush took him under his wing in 46 and never really let go.
Bettie
(19,296 posts)and there is no reasoning with a deep seated belief held by so many that the least qualified man is more competent than the most accomplished woman.
Apparently, having a penis is the only actual qualification for being president of the US.
Grim Chieftain
(1,269 posts)We are faced with the greatest threat to our democracy in our nation's history. The election was years ago, and all this post does is dredge up past divisions. We need to unite and fight the common enemy. Our battle is now.