Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRick Wilson: "The Terrorist In Chief January 6th Was A Terrorist Attack. Trump was its Bin Laden."
https://www.againstallenemies.net/p/the-terrorist-in-chief?r=1ne2d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=webSnip
Call it whatever euphemism helps you sleep: a riot, a protest that got out of hand, a tour group with bad vibes. But in plain English, it was a terrorist attack. It was political violence aimed at overturning a constitutional process through fear, force, and intimidation. It degraded the values, history, and sacrifices that made this country what it was for 250 years. It was an assault designed to make Congress, Trumps own Vice President, and anyone else standing between Donald Trump and power, choose between duty and survival.
Snip
The Republican Party didnt just fail on January 6. The Republican Party has failed every day since, by refusing to treat that attack as what it was: an attempt to overthrow a lawful election.
They could have drawn a bright moral line: no excuses, no minimization, no rehabilitation, no lies. They could have isolated the extremists. They could have made it politically fatal to flirt with insurrection. They could have rejected Trump.
Instead, they did what they always do: they looked at the monster they helped create, then asked themselves whether it polled well in the suburbs, whether the base was still with the Donald.
Snip
Call it whatever euphemism helps you sleep: a riot, a protest that got out of hand, a tour group with bad vibes. But in plain English, it was a terrorist attack. It was political violence aimed at overturning a constitutional process through fear, force, and intimidation. It degraded the values, history, and sacrifices that made this country what it was for 250 years. It was an assault designed to make Congress, Trumps own Vice President, and anyone else standing between Donald Trump and power, choose between duty and survival.
Snip
The Republican Party didnt just fail on January 6. The Republican Party has failed every day since, by refusing to treat that attack as what it was: an attempt to overthrow a lawful election.
They could have drawn a bright moral line: no excuses, no minimization, no rehabilitation, no lies. They could have isolated the extremists. They could have made it politically fatal to flirt with insurrection. They could have rejected Trump.
Instead, they did what they always do: they looked at the monster they helped create, then asked themselves whether it polled well in the suburbs, whether the base was still with the Donald.
Snip
Much More: https://www.againstallenemies.net/p/the-terrorist-in-chief?r=1ne2d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rick Wilson: "The Terrorist In Chief January 6th Was A Terrorist Attack. Trump was its Bin Laden." (Original Post)
tblue37
Tuesday
OP
mopinko
(73,321 posts)1. i saw the deranged post he put up today and gotta wonder- who spun this shit?
lies like that dont just spontaneously appear. someone figures them out, and sends them down the chain.
who was it?
tblue37
(68,202 posts)2. What post? Who?
mopinko
(73,321 posts)3. i think it was a wh xitter post. a "timeline" starting
w ashley babbit getting shot for no reason. but my question is, from the get go, where did this bullshit come from? tourists.
they were all singing from the same hymnal by the end of the next day.
tblue37
(68,202 posts)4. Sorry. I thought you meant Rick Wilson when you said "he" and I was confused.