Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge refuses to toss assault count against NJ Democrat over legislative immunity
A federal judge on Monday denied Rep. LaMonica McIvers (D-N.J.) bid to dismiss a federal assault charge based on legislative immunity, rejecting for the third time the House members arguments that her alleged conduct was protected.
McIver had argued shes immune under the Constitutions Speech and Debate Clause, which shields lawmakers for conduct done as part of their legislative activities.
Semper previously denied her request to toss out two of those charges but reserved judgment on the third pending review of additional video footage. He rejected her arguments on the final charge Monday, as well, saying the footage showed McIver not the officer initiating contact.
The Court cannot find that Defendants alleged conduct was legislative in nature, Semper wrote. When Defendant encountered V-2, and in the few seconds that followed, she was not engaging in factfinding, information gathering, [or] investigative activities[.] Her conduct was not tied to potential legislation or any other policy-making purpose. The physical contact she engaged in outside the facility lacked a legislative prerogative, he continued.
McIver had argued shes immune under the Constitutions Speech and Debate Clause, which shields lawmakers for conduct done as part of their legislative activities.
Semper previously denied her request to toss out two of those charges but reserved judgment on the third pending review of additional video footage. He rejected her arguments on the final charge Monday, as well, saying the footage showed McIver not the officer initiating contact.
The Court cannot find that Defendants alleged conduct was legislative in nature, Semper wrote. When Defendant encountered V-2, and in the few seconds that followed, she was not engaging in factfinding, information gathering, [or] investigative activities[.] Her conduct was not tied to potential legislation or any other policy-making purpose. The physical contact she engaged in outside the facility lacked a legislative prerogative, he continued.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-refuses-to-toss-assault-count-against-nj-democrat-over-legislative-immunity/ar-AA1TD0uW?ocid=BingNewsSerp
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge refuses to toss assault count against NJ Democrat over legislative immunity (Original Post)
MichMan
Monday
OP
It was a jerk move on her part. Maybe because it was against ICE, that just might work.
marble falls
Monday
#3
marble falls
(71,104 posts)1. It may be slow, too slow for some of us, but the walls are closing in.
MichMan
(16,637 posts)2. Looks like she is going to have to count on jury nullification
marble falls
(71,104 posts)3. It was a jerk move on her part. Maybe because it was against ICE, that just might work.
I think that would be a bigger embarrassment for the Trump administration anyway, especially if she follows up with a civil rights lawsuit.