Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCall Trump's power grab in Venezuela what it is: Corporate media must recognize they're being openly lied to...
and report accordingly.
by Marisa Kabas
So many in media are ill-equipped to interview officials about whats happening because they begin with the presumption of legitimacy and dont know enough about history or U.S. foreign policy to foment intelligent pushback and hold officials accountable, journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones posted Sunday on Bluesky. She continued, The questions begin with WILL regime change be successful, not how is it legal or ethical to orchestrate a coup and who are we to decide when leadership must go and who are we to believe we have rights to a sovereign nations resources.
Hannah-Jones pointed specifically to Trumps claim that the US is reclaiming its stolen oil and how theres little pushback on the framing, or an explanation of the veracity of that claim.
This exposes a construct from which mainstream journalists have struggled to shake loose since Trumps first term: If the president says something, then its assumed true. After all his criminal convictions, civil penalties, an attempt to overthrow the government and a life-long track record of lies and fraud, because he was able to recapture the presidency, the tendency remains to paint him in the positive light possible. For some journalists and news organizations, leaning on that assumption helps create order during a chaotic situation. (Its not that other presidents never lied to drum up support for war; they all did to varying extents, though typically made clear after the fact.) From a journalist's perspective, however, its much more challenging to figure out how to cover a president who you know is actively lying to you. But its a challenge we reject at our own peril.
On Friday afternoon the White House press pool reported Trump was out shopping in Florida for marble to outfit his new ballroom. By late Saturday morning he was holding a news conference from his country club saying the US is now running Venezuela. Just like that, we apparently claimed a new colony. Of course he had no details on what that functionally meant, and since then its become clear that by running Venezuela he envisions a remote work-type situation where he posts on Truth Social from a makeshift Situation Room at Mar-A-Lago. Hes literally the man behind the curtain.
Hannah-Jones pointed specifically to Trumps claim that the US is reclaiming its stolen oil and how theres little pushback on the framing, or an explanation of the veracity of that claim.
This exposes a construct from which mainstream journalists have struggled to shake loose since Trumps first term: If the president says something, then its assumed true. After all his criminal convictions, civil penalties, an attempt to overthrow the government and a life-long track record of lies and fraud, because he was able to recapture the presidency, the tendency remains to paint him in the positive light possible. For some journalists and news organizations, leaning on that assumption helps create order during a chaotic situation. (Its not that other presidents never lied to drum up support for war; they all did to varying extents, though typically made clear after the fact.) From a journalist's perspective, however, its much more challenging to figure out how to cover a president who you know is actively lying to you. But its a challenge we reject at our own peril.
On Friday afternoon the White House press pool reported Trump was out shopping in Florida for marble to outfit his new ballroom. By late Saturday morning he was holding a news conference from his country club saying the US is now running Venezuela. Just like that, we apparently claimed a new colony. Of course he had no details on what that functionally meant, and since then its become clear that by running Venezuela he envisions a remote work-type situation where he posts on Truth Social from a makeshift Situation Room at Mar-A-Lago. Hes literally the man behind the curtain.
https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/trump-venezuela-power-grab-corporate-media-coverage
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Call Trump's power grab in Venezuela what it is: Corporate media must recognize they're being openly lied to... (Original Post)
AStern
Monday
OP
RockRaven
(18,729 posts)1. Watchers/listeners/readers must realize that corporate media is openly lying.
Let's cut the bullshit and stop pretending that corporate media is a victim or unwitting dupe. They are active, enthusiastic, knowing participants in the lying.
pansypoo53219
(22,891 posts)2. RATINGS GOLD FROM THE GOLDEN SQUIRREL!!!!
Initech
(107,453 posts)3. All corporate media is 100% complicit in this.
They propped Trump up after we fired him and gave him his megaphone back. They enabled him to be worse than he's ever been. It is they who enabled his worst behavior.