Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToday, Trump's target was Caracas. What tomorrow?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/03/today-trumps-target-was-caracas-what-tomorrowToday, Trumps target was Caracas. What tomorrow?
Stephen Wertheim
He took office promising to annex Greenland and take back the Panama Canal. Now that he has ousted Maduro, other countries could be next
Sun 4 Jan 2026 01.27 EST
snip//
Whatever happens next in Venezuela, the consequences will not be confined there. Trump plainly intended his attack to assert US ownership of the entire region. American dominance in the western hemisphere will never be questioned again, he intoned. In the national security strategy released last month, the administration declared a Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, claiming a mandate to use any means necessary to excise almost any kind of external influence from the Americas. The administration has barely begun to apply its ballyhooed corollary. Trump prefers to cast entities closer to home migrants, gangs and cartels as existential threats to the United States, invading the country from without, subverting it from within.
Trumps attack on Venezuela confirms what his semester of speedboat strikes in the Caribbean suggested: the United States is transmuting the now-exhausted war on terror into a war on so-called narco-terror. Enmity once directed at terrorists in the Middle East is turning toward a kaleidoscope of border-crossing threats in the western hemisphere. Trumps definition of these threats is almost infinitely porous, extending to what he has repeatedly called the enemy from within. Not for nothing did Trump pause from his address on Venezuela to ad lib about the troops he has sent to patrol American cities.
Today, the target was Caracas. What tomorrow? Trump has already drawn up a menu. He took office promising to annex Greenland and take back the Panama Canal. Now that he has ousted Maduro, he could apply much the same rationale to attack any number of countries. Trump claimed yesterday that the cartels are running Mexico, an assertion that contains all the justification Trump would need to invade it. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, meanwhile, warned the government of Cuba to be concerned.
Even if the best-case scenario transpires in Venezuela if a stable, oil-gushing, pro-American democracy suddenly springs to life success may embolden the administration to find out just how far it can go to remake the region to its liking.
But best cases rarely come to pass. More likely, Donald Trumps luck with hit-and-run military strikes is about to run out. Great nations do not fight endless wars, he said in his first term. Then what kind of nation is Trumps America?
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Today, Trump's target was Caracas. What tomorrow? (Original Post)
babylonsister
Sunday
OP
Lovie777
(21,772 posts)1. RWers badly want Greenland......
no_hypocrisy
(54,293 posts)2. Hitler didn't stop at Sudetenland.
Johonny
(25,475 posts)3. I assume golfing
Trump barely in charge. This is Miller and Marcos war.
Emile
(40,643 posts)4. Greenland?
Kid Berwyn
(22,990 posts)5. Wherever Putin tells him.
What Fiona Hill reported:
I myself, back in 2019, had a rather bizarre experience when I was in government where the Russians proposed a swap for Ukraine and Venezuela. Suggesting that as Venezuela we were having a crisis with Venezuela, at the time after Nicolas Maduro was, you know, basically trying to stay in power indefinitely that if we pulled out of Ukraine, they would pull out of Venezuela where theyd sent in some security people to help prop up Maduro. And it just reinforced the way that they think. And we should not play into that way of thinking.
Source: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/putins-war-in-ukraine-a-conversation-with-fiona-hill-and-angela-stent/
I myself, back in 2019, had a rather bizarre experience when I was in government where the Russians proposed a swap for Ukraine and Venezuela. Suggesting that as Venezuela we were having a crisis with Venezuela, at the time after Nicolas Maduro was, you know, basically trying to stay in power indefinitely that if we pulled out of Ukraine, they would pull out of Venezuela where theyd sent in some security people to help prop up Maduro. And it just reinforced the way that they think. And we should not play into that way of thinking.
Source: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/putins-war-in-ukraine-a-conversation-with-fiona-hill-and-angela-stent/
Horse with no Name
(34,208 posts)6. Rubio heavily hinted it was Cuba
I almost fell out of my chair with what he said.
imanamerican63
(15,884 posts)7. California, Illinois and other Democratic states?
This is just the beginning!