Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,319 posts)
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 08:56 PM 18 hrs ago

Legal expert slams Supreme Court Justice for attempt to 'narrow the forces he unleashed'

Kavanaugh's Illinois National Guard solo concurrence, he adds footnote that seems to try to calm outrage over his solo opinion in the CA ICE emergency ruling that led to some calling race-based immigration arrests "Kavanaugh stops."

Legal expert slams Supreme Court Justice for attempt to 'narrow the forces he unleashed' www.rawstory.com/brett-kavana...

Matthew Chapman (@fawfulfan.bsky.social) 2025-12-24T01:17:20.647Z

https://www.rawstory.com/brett-kavanaugh-2674826052/

The Supreme Court dropped a bombshell on Tuesday by handing President Donald Trump a rare loss, ruling 6-3 to deny a stay on deploying the National Guard to Illinois — but the rebuke of Trump was not the only thing some legal experts noticed in the opinion.

Specifically, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who drafted a concurrence with the majority on one of the key issues in the decision, made statements in his opinion that suggest he may regret one of the most controversial court decisions in recent months.

In a ruling in September that stayed a lower court block on certain kinds of immigration raids in California, Kavanaugh authored a concurrence in which he appeared to endorse profiling by federal agents outright, while simultaneously denying that American citizens have anything to fear from this. "The Government sometimes makes brief investigative stops to check the immigration status of those who gather in locations where people are hired for day jobs; who work or appear to work in jobs such as construction, landscaping, agriculture, or car washes that often do not require paperwork and are therefore attractive to illegal immigrants; and who do not speak much if any English," he wrote.

This ruling sparked a wave of outrage, and several legal and political observers began calling immigration enforcement based on racial or ethnic profiling "Kavanaugh stops," and tallying up the growing number of alleged incidents of this type occurring under the Trump administration.

All of this may have stung the justice, because he appeared to qualify or walk back this sentiment in his concurrence in the Illinois case.

"The basic constitutional rules governing that dispute are longstanding and clear: The Fourth Amendment requires that immigration stops must be based on reasonable suspicion of illegal presence, stops must be brief, arrests must be based on probable cause, and officers must not employ excessive force," wrote Kavanaugh. "Moreover, the officers must not make interior immigration stops or arrests based on race or ethnicity."

This change of tone was not lost on New York University law professor and former Defense Department special counsel Ryan Goodman.

"Kavanaugh goes out of his way to pen a footnote not having to deal with the case at hand," Goodman wrote on X. "He appears to be trying to narrow the forces he unleashed with his prior opinion allowing for race- and ethnicity-based #KavanaughStops."

ICE and the other goons have relied on the Kavanaugh opinion to racially profile non-white individuals. Due process applies to everyone including people who are not white. We will see this opinion cited in some of the cases that are pending.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,319 posts)
1. Here is part of the opinion where this asshole tries to undo the damage that his prior opinion caused
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 09:03 PM
18 hrs ago

ICE and other goons were relying on Kavanaugh's prior opinion to racially profile non-whites.

NOTED: In Kavanaugh's Illinois National Guard solo concurrence, he adds footnote that seems to try to calm outrage over his solo opinion in the CA ICE emergency ruling that led to some calling race-based immigration arrests "Kavanaugh stops." Earlier: www.politico.com/news/2025/09...

Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein.bsky.social) 2025-12-23T21:09:56.059Z


Due process applies to non-whites as well as white people

flashman13

(1,964 posts)
4. This "minor" little footnote could have wide spread ramifications. It puts ICE on notice that their tactics are illegal.
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 10:17 PM
17 hrs ago

OldBaldy1701E

(9,992 posts)
8. And, that the orange gibbon may not get to be King For Life!
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 11:03 PM
16 hrs ago

Which means he can still be held accountable for what he has done to our democracy.

BlueWaveNeverEnd

(12,662 posts)
6. ICE employs the "Kavanaugh stops" ruling to drag brown people off the street
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 10:28 PM
17 hrs ago

Im glad it stings Kavanaugh

appmanga

(1,376 posts)
10. I'll go ahead and mildly celebrate this reversal...
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 11:34 PM
16 hrs ago

...because a) it shows there's some sensitivity to how he's seen by the public, so attention is being paid by at least one justice to public sentiment; b) it shows he will reverse himself, something that's rare in most instances anywhere, but almost unknown for SC justices.

I'll take signs of hope where I can find them.

BurnDoubt

(1,386 posts)
9. I was thinking today how capricious...
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 11:11 PM
16 hrs ago

this process of "interpretation" and "rendering an opinion" can be. How can we trust our Constitution to a SMALL group when one or more may be beholden to "influencers".
How many Winnebagos did it cost to make a King of a Fool? Or overturn "Black-Letter Law" to make it align with Christo-Fascist Doctrine by a Catholic majority.
If it stinks, it's because it DOES.
The SCOTUS Right Wing majority all originated in the Heritage Foundation and is taking their orders from them.
McConnell shit all over the traditional method of confirming Justices TWICE, including walking back his "the next President should be able to confirm the next Supreme Court Justice " (this close to the Election) rule.

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,319 posts)
12. The Kavanaugh Stop's Legacy: 50 Days, 170+ Detained Citizens, Zero Answers
Wed Dec 24, 2025, 12:30 PM
3 hrs ago

Kavanaugh Stops were violative of due process and should had never been allowed to take place


The Kavanaugh Stop’s Legacy: 50 Days, 170+ Detained Citizens, Zero Answers
https://abovethelaw.com/2025/10/the-kavanaugh-stops-legacy-50-days-170-detained-citizens-zero-answers/

Above The Law (@abovethelaw.com) 2025-10-31T15:32:49.127Z

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/10/the-kavanaugh-stops-legacy-50-days-170-detained-citizens-zero-answers/

It was just last month that Brett Kavanaugh gave his explanation for why it was perfectly okay for Homeland Security goons to profile brown people and detain them based on nothing more than the color of their skin. While his cowardly colleagues in the majority on that shadow docket decision refused to explain their thinking, Kavanaugh actually wrote a concurrence that was so out of touch with reality as to be embarrassing. But at least it was an explanation.

The key bit from him that has stood out is this:

Importantly, reasonable suspicion means only that immigration officers may briefly stop the individual and inquire about immigration status. If the person is a U. S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, that individual will be free to go after the brief encounter. Only if the person is illegally in the United States may the stop lead to further immigration proceedings.


It’s this weird, privileged, out-of-touch statement that if ICE or CBP stop you for being brown, they’ll let you go as soon as you show them that you’re an American citizen. Of course, we knew at the time that wasn’t true. Hell, there were details that Kavanaugh ignored in that very lawsuit, which Justice Sotomayor called out in her dissent. But literally in this very lawsuit was the documentation of how it wasn’t so simple:

To give just one example, Plaintiff Jason Brian Gavidia is a U.S. citizen who was born and raised in East Los Angeles and identifies as Latino. On the afternoon of June 12, he stepped onto the sidewalk outside of a tow yard in Montebello, California, where he saw agents carrying handguns and military-style rifles. One agent ordered him to “Stop right there” while another “ran towards [him].” The agents repeatedly asked Gavidia whether he is American—and they repeatedly ignored his answer: “I am an American.” The agents asked Gavidia what hospital he was born in—and he explained that he did not know which hospital. “The agents forcefully pushed [Gavidia] up against the metal gated fence, put [his] hands behind [his] back, and twisted [his] arm.” An agent asked again, “What hospital were you born in?” Gavidia again explained that he did not know which hospital and said “East L.A.” He then told the agents he could show them his Real ID. The agents took Gavidia’s ID and his phone and kept his phone for 20 minutes. They never returned his ID.


Drexel law professor Anil Kalhan quickly dubbed these bullshit pretextual stops of US citizens as “Kavanaugh stops” and the name has stuck....

It feels like every day we hear about another few:

ICE violently detain father & son walking to school—teenage boy had to be rushed to hospital.

"I was just going to school," kid cries out. "I'm underage!"

The 16-year-old star athlete is a U.S. citizen—agents sent him to the hospital with severe injuries to his back & neck.

Houston, Texas.

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻 (@longtimehistory.bsky.social) 2025-10-27T20:14:38.989Z


......But, for now at least, that stain should stick to Brett Kavanaugh. He’s justified this. He’s insisted these kinds of stops are no big deal, even as there was evidence then, and even with more mounting evidence now, that immigration officials don’t give a shit if you are an American citizen. If you’re darker skinned, they can treat you like shit, lock you up, beat you up, ignore your protestations and even evidence of American citizenship.

It is a deep, dark stain on America as a supposed land of freedom, and it should be tied up with Brett Kavanaugh’s legacy forever.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Legal expert slams Suprem...