General Discussion

purr-rat beauty

(977 posts) Fri Dec 19, 2025, 10:34 AM Dec 19

If the Epstein Files are a hoax

Why do ya need to redact them?

If grown ass men in power can't disprove the hoax then we know why they're redacted

Guilty AF

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If the Epstein Files are a hoax (Original Post) purr-rat beauty Dec 19 OP

Let's not forget that QAnon was and is a significant part of MAGA. underpants Dec 19 #1

There is and will be independent evidence, more all the time. usonian Dec 19 #2

Where are you reading this? AZJonnie Dec 19 #3

Senator Ron Wyden is at the forefront. usonian Dec 19 #4

Sorry, I misread you, I thought you meant there were actual investigations that recently began AZJonnie Dec 19 #5

I honestly don't know how far investigations can go either in committee or in other civil or criminal suits. usonian Dec 19 #6

AGREED vapor2 Dec 19 #7

DOJ Defenders of Jeffrey usonian Dec 19 #8

underpants

(194,947 posts)

1. Let's not forget that QAnon was and is a significant part of MAGA.

Reply to purr-rat beauty (Original post)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 10:43 AM

Dec 19

usonian

(23,579 posts)

2. There is and will be independent evidence, more all the time.

Reply to purr-rat beauty (Original post)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 10:56 AM

Dec 19

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220810679

The financial investigations are just beginning. Money laundering and blackmail will be uncovered. Tons of it, "perhaps" including the King of blackmail and money laundering.

AZJonnie

(2,836 posts)

3. Where are you reading this?

Reply to usonian (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 01:20 PM

Dec 19

"The financial investigations are just beginning"?

What agency is doing the investigation(s), and how do you know it's just recently beginning?

Not saying you're incorrect or anything, I'm just wondering if you could point to where I could read about the beginning of new financial investigations into Epstein?

usonian

(23,579 posts)

4. Senator Ron Wyden is at the forefront.

Reply to AZJonnie (Reply #3)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 02:23 PM

Dec 19

Please check his statements.

Sample

https://www.finance.senate.gov/ranking-members-news/as-trump-sits-on-key-epstein-files-wyden-lays-out-follow-the-money-investigation-for-doj

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/25/nx-s1-5479159/a-democratic-senator-was-already-investigating-jeffrey-epsteins-finances

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-wyden-pushes-treasury-department-release-epstein-banking/story?id=125220013

I'm not Wikipedia, which demands links to everything.

I have two major posts in the works, plus everything else.

Ask the duck and ye shall find!

AZJonnie

(2,836 posts)

5. Sorry, I misread you, I thought you meant there were actual investigations that recently began

Reply to usonian (Reply #4)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 02:49 PM

Dec 19

Seems more you meant "only the surface has been scratched, there's lot's more to potentially look into". My bad, I just read it wrong. Thanks!

My thought is there won't be any such investigations unless Dems come back into power, and even then, it's not guaranteed.

usonian

(23,579 posts)

6. I honestly don't know how far investigations can go either in committee or in other civil or criminal suits.

Reply to AZJonnie (Reply #5)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 02:55 PM

Dec 19

I have posted what open source info was collected in recent times..

Follow the link to the more extensive post I made.

It's beyond my pay grade. You know about the Epstein family emails.

Who knows what further digging or even voluntary info releases may find?

I don't.

vapor2

(3,786 posts)

7. AGREED

Reply to usonian (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 08:35 PM

Dec 19

and Massie may reveal names as perhaps the victims. People keep saying the DOJ has not obeyed the law......they are effn lawless......every.single.one.of.them

usonian

(23,579 posts)

8. DOJ Defenders of Jeffrey

Reply to vapor2 (Reply #7)

Fri Dec 19, 2025, 08:38 PM

Dec 19

That is all!

Reply to this discussion