General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's new Air Force One jet from Boeing is delayed again
Trump's new Air Force One jet from Boeing is delayed again
Published Fri, Dec 12 2025 7:03 PM EST
Updated 5 Hours Ago
Reuters

A model of a proposed design for a new Air Force One plane sits on the table as US President Donald Trump meets with Prime Minister of Norway Jonas Gahr Store in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on April 24, 2025.
Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images
The U.S. Air Force said on Friday the delivery of the first of two new Air Force One jets from Boeing has been delayed by another year to mid-2028, the latest in a series of delays.
The latest delay risks further upsetting President Donald Trump, who said he wants to fly in the new planes before the end of his term in January 2029.
The cost for Boeing's current effort to build the two new jets is over $5 billion. The current Air Force One airplanes entered service in 1990.
The Air Force One program, which involves converting two 747-8 aircraft into specialized jets equipped with advanced communications and defense systems to serve as the next generation of U.S. presidential air transport, would be four years behind schedule with a 2028 delivery.
{snip}
MineralMan
(150,641 posts)on the day before Inauguration Day of the new Democratic President.
nilram
(3,471 posts)MineralMan
(150,641 posts)Mark.b2
(720 posts)How in the damn world can they announce an almost three year delay in a project?
They need competition.
newdeal2
(4,778 posts)Or a Chinese one?
I do hope this president tries his luck in a SpaceX rocket.
Mark.b2
(720 posts)747s can fly for decades, so AF1 should be good for a while.
It wouldnt be the worst thing in the world for an upstart to put competitive pressure on Boeing. Its too bad we dont have a McDonnell-Douglas around, notwithstanding the MD-80.
Airbus has given them plenty in the commercial airline space. It seems 3/4 of the planes I ride are Airbus.
Bluetus
(2,296 posts)They have competition 737 and up from Airbus.
They have competition below 737 from Embraer.
I think the issue is that with Exec competition 1000X the pay of line workers, there is no longer any sense of team, because, in fact, the exec are 100% in it for their own personal gain, and every decision is driven by how they can screw workers and maximize their stock options.
It isn't just the airframe industry. It is most large industries, but the aeronautics industry is the most vivid of cases. This industry is almost exactly 100 years old. And without any notable exceptions, the first 50 years were led by people with dreams and vision of achieving something revolutionary. And the last 50 years have been owned by the spreadsheet junkies with no vision at all.
The exceptions are so rare as to count on one hand. Burt Rutan for one. And more recently we have a couple of companies trying to re-commercialize supersonic travel with a new wave of tech. Personally, I am very interested in what Jetzero is trying to do, refining and scaling the flying wing designs (think B2 bomber). I flew nearly 2 million miles during my working career, and most of them were uncomfortable, if not miserable. The Jetzero approach replaces those narrow, claustrophobic tubes with wide, open cabins. The engines are mounted above the body, making them quieter around airports, and easier to pilot in the event of an engine failure (because both engines are near the center axis.) I hope they succeed, but they may not be employing enough spreadsheet junkies to make it is these late-stage capitalism years.
After all those years of almost daily flying, I have only boarded planes a dozen times in the past 15 years, and will be happy to never fight my way through another one of those narrow tubes. I hope Jetzero succeeds.
https://www.jetzero.aero/
C_U_L8R
(48,878 posts)It would be a shame if the wings fell off mid flight.