Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(132,864 posts)
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 06:27 PM Apr 2025

GOP 'Save Act' May Disenfranchise Married Women, Overseas Voters Including the Military

The Republican-controlled House passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE Act) Thursday, largely along party lines, requiring "documentary proof of United States citizenship," to vote in federal elections.

The text of the bill requires Americans to present a U.S. passport, a birth certificate, a military I.D., or a state issued I.D. that shows the applicant was born in the United States, in order to register to vote in federal elections. It also requires applicants to present the documents in person to an election official in their voting district.

The bill has outraged voting rights activists because of its potential to disenfranchise millions of legal voters, especially voters in rural communities, students, disabled and seniors, who may not possess the required documentation, and/or may not be able to physically get themselves to an elections office where they will be required to present the documents in person.

It also has the real potential to disenfranchise married women who have changed their last names. If an applicant doesn't have a U.S. passport, or another federal document that proves citizenship under their current legal name, the alternate required documentation are birth records proving they were born in the United States, which may result in women who do not use their birth names being denied voter registration.

https://meidasnews.com/news/gop-save-act-may-disenfranchise-married-women-overseas-voters-including-the-military

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP 'Save Act' May Disenfranchise Married Women, Overseas Voters Including the Military (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2025 OP
Maddow Blog-House Republicans pass the 'SAVE Act,' which is a solution in search of a problem LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author YepYep Apr 2025 #2

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,963 posts)
1. Maddow Blog-House Republicans pass the 'SAVE Act,' which is a solution in search of a problem
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 06:30 PM
Apr 2025

I volunteer on voting rights/voter protection efforts. Non-citizens do not vote
 
The House GOP majority passed a ban on noncitizen voting, which (a) almost never happens; and (b) is already illegal. It’s worth understanding why.

The SAVE Act would:
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators

House Republicans passed it anyway. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-04-10T19:49:50.489Z

The SAVE Act would:
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators

House Republicans passed it anyway.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/house-republicans-pass-act-solution-search-problem-rcna200681

The GOP duo pitched legislation that would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. The absurdity of watching two notorious election deniers pretend to be deeply concerned with the integrity of elections was a detail the political world was apparently supposed to overlook.

Soon after, House Republicans followed through, introducing the “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” (or “SAVE Act”). As NBC News reported, that same bill has now passed the chamber.

The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, would amend the National Voter Registration Act so that states would be required to obtain proof of citizenship in person from people who are registering to vote. It would also require states to establish a program to remove undocumented immigrants from existing voter rolls and would allow American citizens to sue election officials that don’t follow proof of citizenship requirements.


The measure cleared the chamber on a 220-208 vote, with four Democrats — Reps. Ed Case of Hawaii; Henry Cuellar of Texas; Jared Golden of Maine; and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington — voting with the majority. No GOP members opposed the bill.

The principal concern with the legislation is that it’s a solution in search of a problem. To hear Republicans tell it, policymakers must prevent noncitizens from voting, which probably sounds reasonable. In fact, it’s so reasonable that the SAVE Act is redundant: There are literally zero locations in the United States where noncitizens can vote in federal and/or state elections.

GOP lawmakers have also argued that legislation is needed to curtail the scourge of noncitizens who are already voting. Except, Republicans have gone searching for evidence of this problem and found effectively nothing.....

What’s more, as The Associated Press reported last month, state elections officials — from both parties — have expressed practical concerns about how these costly proposed procedures would be implemented and paid for. The same article added, “Voting rights groups have said married women who have changed their name could have trouble registering under the SAVE Act because their birth certificate lists their maiden name.”....

The bill now heads to the Senate, where Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah is championing a companion bill. The odds of the legislation overcoming a Democratic filibuster, however, are poor. Watch this space.

During the Texas voter id litigation back in 2012, Greg Abbott as AG argued that non-citizens were voting but could provide no evidence of this because non-citizens are too scared to break the law by voting

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP 'Save Act' May Disenf...