General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP 'Save Act' May Disenfranchise Married Women, Overseas Voters Including the Military
The Republican-controlled House passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (SAVE Act) Thursday, largely along party lines, requiring "documentary proof of United States citizenship," to vote in federal elections.
The text of the bill requires Americans to present a U.S. passport, a birth certificate, a military I.D., or a state issued I.D. that shows the applicant was born in the United States, in order to register to vote in federal elections. It also requires applicants to present the documents in person to an election official in their voting district.
The bill has outraged voting rights activists because of its potential to disenfranchise millions of legal voters, especially voters in rural communities, students, disabled and seniors, who may not possess the required documentation, and/or may not be able to physically get themselves to an elections office where they will be required to present the documents in person.
It also has the real potential to disenfranchise married women who have changed their last names. If an applicant doesn't have a U.S. passport, or another federal document that proves citizenship under their current legal name, the alternate required documentation are birth records proving they were born in the United States, which may result in women who do not use their birth names being denied voter registration.
https://meidasnews.com/news/gop-save-act-may-disenfranchise-married-women-overseas-voters-including-the-military
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,963 posts)I volunteer on voting rights/voter protection efforts. Non-citizens do not vote
The House GOP majority passed a ban on noncitizen voting, which (a) almost never happens; and (b) is already illegal. Its worth understanding why.
The SAVE Act would:
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-04-10T19:49:50.489Z
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators
House Republicans passed it anyway. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators
House Republicans passed it anyway.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/house-republicans-pass-act-solution-search-problem-rcna200681
Soon after, House Republicans followed through, introducing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (or SAVE Act). As NBC News reported, that same bill has now passed the chamber.
The measure cleared the chamber on a 220-208 vote, with four Democrats Reps. Ed Case of Hawaii; Henry Cuellar of Texas; Jared Golden of Maine; and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington voting with the majority. No GOP members opposed the bill.
The principal concern with the legislation is that its a solution in search of a problem. To hear Republicans tell it, policymakers must prevent noncitizens from voting, which probably sounds reasonable. In fact, its so reasonable that the SAVE Act is redundant: There are literally zero locations in the United States where noncitizens can vote in federal and/or state elections.
GOP lawmakers have also argued that legislation is needed to curtail the scourge of noncitizens who are already voting. Except, Republicans have gone searching for evidence of this problem and found effectively nothing.....
Whats more, as The Associated Press reported last month, state elections officials from both parties have expressed practical concerns about how these costly proposed procedures would be implemented and paid for. The same article added, Voting rights groups have said married women who have changed their name could have trouble registering under the SAVE Act because their birth certificate lists their maiden name.....
The bill now heads to the Senate, where Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah is championing a companion bill. The odds of the legislation overcoming a Democratic filibuster, however, are poor. Watch this space.
During the Texas voter id litigation back in 2012, Greg Abbott as AG argued that non-citizens were voting but could provide no evidence of this because non-citizens are too scared to break the law by voting
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
YepYep This message was self-deleted by its author.