General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLDF Denounces House Passage of SAVE Act, Urges Senate to Reject Bill that Will Disenfranchise Millions of Americans
Today, the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) urges the U.S. Senate to reject the misleadingly entitled “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act”, a disastrous, discriminatory, inefficient, and unnecessary bill passed by the House that would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters and upend Congress’ historic role of protecting the freedom to vote rather than suppressing it.
The SAVE Act would effectively eliminate online voter registration and severely curtail voter registration drives, methods that millions of Americans rely upon every year to register to vote or update their registrations. The SAVE Act also requires every would-be voter to arrive in person at their local elections office with the original copy of a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization certificate in order to register to vote.
These requirements create especially harsh barriers to political participation for Black people, people of color, married people who have changed their names, rural voters, poor people, and others who may have difficulty obtaining a passport or birth certificate. Only half of the total population and only a third of Black people hold valid U.S. passports, while nearly half of all Black Americans under 30 do not have a license with their current name and address. That’s not to mention the nearly 70 million Americans who have taken a spouse’s last name that may not match the name on their birth certificate.
The law would also undercut voter registration drives, which have been essential for mobilizing political participation in Black communities. If adopted, this would be an especially troubling effect as racial disparities in voter turnout have grown in the past decade
https://www.naacpldf.org/press-release/ldf-denounces-house-passage-of-save-act-urges-senate-to-reject-bill-that-will-disenfranchise-millions-of-americans/
✌🏻

GoreWon2000
(1,461 posts)The U. S. constitution clearly gives the states the authority to run elections. This is why the 2000 Rehnquist 5 Bush vs Gore decision was also unconstitutional because it took away Florida's right to conduct an election and count all of the uncounted votes.
But to get this before scotus before midterms is a stretch
✌🏻
GoreWon2000
(1,461 posts)Could put this off until next term … and stall to end of term like they have in the past
But it has to be challenged up the chain to get there first
✌🏻
GoreWon2000
(1,461 posts)by Mark Elias.
Lovie777
(17,984 posts)RJ-MacReady
(363 posts)LymphocyteLover
(7,797 posts)I don't see how 7 Dems vote for it.
Do you know the fate of it in the Senate right now?
RJ-MacReady
(363 posts)But I can't see how any Democrat votes for it even Fetterman. But even if the usual ones do it's still not enough. Now in the very off chance Democrats refuse to filibuster that's when I leave the party and become an independent liberal.
LetMyPeopleVote
(161,645 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 10, 2025, 06:35 PM - Edit history (1)
I volunteer on voting rights/voter protection efforts. Non-citizens do not vote
The House GOP majority passed a ban on noncitizen voting, which (a) almost never happens; and (b) is already illegal. It’s worth understanding why.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3lmiblspuhc2h
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators
House Republicans passed it anyway.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/house-republicans-pass-act-solution-search-problem-rcna200681
Soon after, House Republicans followed through, introducing the “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” (or “SAVE Act”). As NBC News reported, that same bill has now passed the chamber.
The measure cleared the chamber on a 220-208 vote, with four Democrats — Reps. Ed Case of Hawaii; Henry Cuellar of Texas; Jared Golden of Maine; and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington — voting with the majority. No GOP members opposed the bill.
The principal concern with the legislation is that it’s a solution in search of a problem. To hear Republicans tell it, policymakers must prevent noncitizens from voting, which probably sounds reasonable. In fact, it’s so reasonable that the SAVE Act is redundant: There are literally zero locations in the United States where noncitizens can vote in federal and/or state elections.
GOP lawmakers have also argued that legislation is needed to curtail the scourge of noncitizens who are already voting. Except, Republicans have gone searching for evidence of this problem and found effectively nothing.....
What’s more, as The Associated Press reported last month, state elections officials — from both parties — have expressed practical concerns about how these costly proposed procedures would be implemented and paid for. The same article added, “Voting rights groups have said married women who have changed their name could have trouble registering under the SAVE Act because their birth certificate lists their maiden name.”....
The bill now heads to the Senate, where Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah is championing a companion bill. The odds of the legislation overcoming a Democratic filibuster, however, are poor. Watch this space.
During the Texas voter id litigation back in 2012, Greg Abbott as AG argued that non-citizens were voting but could provide no evidence of this because non-citizens are too scared to break the law by voting
dweller
(26,390 posts)It only applies to those registering to vote ?
It doesn’t apply to those already registered ?
Still a problem , but not to those registered previously .
🤔
✌🏻