Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dweller

(26,390 posts)
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 01:27 PM Apr 10

LDF Denounces House Passage of SAVE Act, Urges Senate to Reject Bill that Will Disenfranchise Millions of Americans

Today, the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) urges the U.S. Senate to reject the misleadingly entitled “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act”, a disastrous, discriminatory, inefficient, and unnecessary bill passed by the House that would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters and upend Congress’ historic role of protecting the freedom to vote rather than suppressing it.

The SAVE Act would effectively eliminate online voter registration and severely curtail voter registration drives, methods that millions of Americans rely upon every year to register to vote or update their registrations. The SAVE Act also requires every would-be voter to arrive in person at their local elections office with the original copy of a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization certificate in order to register to vote.

These requirements create especially harsh barriers to political participation for Black people, people of color, married people who have changed their names, rural voters, poor people, and others who may have difficulty obtaining a passport or birth certificate. Only half of the total population and only a third of Black people hold valid U.S. passports, while nearly half of all Black Americans under 30 do not have a license with their current name and address. That’s not to mention the nearly 70 million Americans who have taken a spouse’s last name that may not match the name on their birth certificate.

The law would also undercut voter registration drives, which have been essential for mobilizing political participation in Black communities. If adopted, this would be an especially troubling effect as racial disparities in voter turnout have grown in the past decade

https://www.naacpldf.org/press-release/ldf-denounces-house-passage-of-save-act-urges-senate-to-reject-bill-that-will-disenfranchise-millions-of-americans/


✌🏻

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LDF Denounces House Passage of SAVE Act, Urges Senate to Reject Bill that Will Disenfranchise Millions of Americans (Original Post) dweller Apr 10 OP
It's unconstitutional GoreWon2000 Apr 10 #1
I know dweller Apr 10 #3
We'll see. GoreWon2000 Apr 10 #4
scotus dweller Apr 10 #5
I'm sure it'll get challenged GoreWon2000 Apr 10 #6
That's the GQP purpose................ Lovie777 Apr 10 #2
This will be filibustered RJ-MacReady Apr 10 #7
it has to be, but I see a bunch of people worried that it's going to pass the Senate LymphocyteLover Yesterday #11
I don't, no RJ-MacReady Yesterday #12
Maddow Blog-House Republicans pass the 'SAVE Act,' which is a solution in search of a problem LetMyPeopleVote Apr 10 #8
So am I reading this right ? dweller Apr 10 #9
Marc Elias on House republicans trying try disenfranchise millions of voters LetMyPeopleVote Apr 10 #10
 

GoreWon2000

(1,461 posts)
1. It's unconstitutional
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 01:31 PM
Apr 10

The U. S. constitution clearly gives the states the authority to run elections. This is why the 2000 Rehnquist 5 Bush vs Gore decision was also unconstitutional because it took away Florida's right to conduct an election and count all of the uncounted votes.

dweller

(26,390 posts)
5. scotus
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 01:42 PM
Apr 10

Could put this off until next term … and stall to end of term like they have in the past
But it has to be challenged up the chain to get there first

✌🏻

LymphocyteLover

(7,797 posts)
11. it has to be, but I see a bunch of people worried that it's going to pass the Senate
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 08:24 AM
Yesterday

I don't see how 7 Dems vote for it.

Do you know the fate of it in the Senate right now?

RJ-MacReady

(363 posts)
12. I don't, no
Thu Apr 17, 2025, 08:37 AM
Yesterday

But I can't see how any Democrat votes for it even Fetterman. But even if the usual ones do it's still not enough. Now in the very off chance Democrats refuse to filibuster that's when I leave the party and become an independent liberal.

LetMyPeopleVote

(161,645 posts)
8. Maddow Blog-House Republicans pass the 'SAVE Act,' which is a solution in search of a problem
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 05:29 PM
Apr 10

Last edited Thu Apr 10, 2025, 06:35 PM - Edit history (1)

I volunteer on voting rights/voter protection efforts. Non-citizens do not vote
 
The House GOP majority passed a ban on noncitizen voting, which (a) almost never happens; and (b) is already illegal. It’s worth understanding why.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3lmiblspuhc2h

The SAVE Act would:
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators

House Republicans passed it anyway.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/house-republicans-pass-act-solution-search-problem-rcna200681

The GOP duo pitched legislation that would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. The absurdity of watching two notorious election deniers pretend to be deeply concerned with the integrity of elections was a detail the political world was apparently supposed to overlook.

Soon after, House Republicans followed through, introducing the “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act” (or “SAVE Act”). As NBC News reported, that same bill has now passed the chamber.

The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, would amend the National Voter Registration Act so that states would be required to obtain proof of citizenship in person from people who are registering to vote. It would also require states to establish a program to remove undocumented immigrants from existing voter rolls and would allow American citizens to sue election officials that don’t follow proof of citizenship requirements.


The measure cleared the chamber on a 220-208 vote, with four Democrats — Reps. Ed Case of Hawaii; Henry Cuellar of Texas; Jared Golden of Maine; and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington — voting with the majority. No GOP members opposed the bill.

The principal concern with the legislation is that it’s a solution in search of a problem. To hear Republicans tell it, policymakers must prevent noncitizens from voting, which probably sounds reasonable. In fact, it’s so reasonable that the SAVE Act is redundant: There are literally zero locations in the United States where noncitizens can vote in federal and/or state elections.

GOP lawmakers have also argued that legislation is needed to curtail the scourge of noncitizens who are already voting. Except, Republicans have gone searching for evidence of this problem and found effectively nothing.....

What’s more, as The Associated Press reported last month, state elections officials — from both parties — have expressed practical concerns about how these costly proposed procedures would be implemented and paid for. The same article added, “Voting rights groups have said married women who have changed their name could have trouble registering under the SAVE Act because their birth certificate lists their maiden name.”....

The bill now heads to the Senate, where Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah is championing a companion bill. The odds of the legislation overcoming a Democratic filibuster, however, are poor. Watch this space.

During the Texas voter id litigation back in 2012, Greg Abbott as AG argued that non-citizens were voting but could provide no evidence of this because non-citizens are too scared to break the law by voting

dweller

(26,390 posts)
9. So am I reading this right ?
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 05:35 PM
Apr 10

It only applies to those registering to vote ?
It doesn’t apply to those already registered ?

Still a problem , but not to those registered previously .

🤔




✌🏻

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LDF Denounces House Passa...