General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoindexterOglethorpe
(28,405 posts)It's not just women that are affected by it?
niyad
(129,333 posts)as has been discussed here a number of times.
haele
(15,030 posts)Just to vote.
Not that anyone else who changed their birth certificate name doesn't have to, but married women are the largest group affected.
Only upside; J.D Vance won't be able to vote once it's signed either...
PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,405 posts)And why won't Vance be able to vote once it's passed? Did he change his name at marriage?
haele
(15,030 posts)The name on his birth certificate is....
(drum Roll)
James Donald Bowman
J.D Vance is actually his second name change.
On edit - unfortunately, he probably has a RealID or Passport.
And those IDs are more likely to be faked for illegal purposes by US Citizens than the occurrence of an undocumented person voting.
H2O Man
(78,504 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,405 posts)It enraged me back when Hillary had to changer her surname when Bill was running for President.
obamanut2012
(29,148 posts)dweller
(27,773 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 10, 2025, 12:37 PM - Edit history (1)
Passed it. ?
No
✌🏻
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,270 posts)I volunteer on voting rights/voter protection efforts. Non-citizens do not vote
The House GOP majority passed a ban on noncitizen voting, which (a) almost never happens; and (b) is already illegal. Its worth understanding why.
The SAVE Act would:
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-04-10T19:49:50.489Z
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators
House Republicans passed it anyway. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
- make it harder for Americans to vote
- address a problem that doesn't exist
- impose new burdens on state election administrators
House Republicans passed it anyway.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/house-republicans-pass-act-solution-search-problem-rcna200681
Soon after, House Republicans followed through, introducing the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (or SAVE Act). As NBC News reported, that same bill has now passed the chamber.
The measure cleared the chamber on a 220-208 vote, with four Democrats Reps. Ed Case of Hawaii; Henry Cuellar of Texas; Jared Golden of Maine; and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington voting with the majority. No GOP members opposed the bill.
The principal concern with the legislation is that its a solution in search of a problem. To hear Republicans tell it, policymakers must prevent noncitizens from voting, which probably sounds reasonable. In fact, its so reasonable that the SAVE Act is redundant: There are literally zero locations in the United States where noncitizens can vote in federal and/or state elections.
GOP lawmakers have also argued that legislation is needed to curtail the scourge of noncitizens who are already voting. Except, Republicans have gone searching for evidence of this problem and found effectively nothing.....
Whats more, as The Associated Press reported last month, state elections officials from both parties have expressed practical concerns about how these costly proposed procedures would be implemented and paid for. The same article added, Voting rights groups have said married women who have changed their name could have trouble registering under the SAVE Act because their birth certificate lists their maiden name.....
The bill now heads to the Senate, where Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah is championing a companion bill. The odds of the legislation overcoming a Democratic filibuster, however, are poor. Watch this space.
During the Texas voter id litigation back in 2012, Greg Abbott as AG argued that non-citizens were voting but could provide no evidence of this because non-citizens are too scared to break the law by voting
Bettie
(19,219 posts)FFS.
Though, the names of those who did this were not a surprise.