Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-In first big test of Trump's second term, voters tell GOP what it didn't want to hear
After November, many suggested Republicans had entered an era of electoral dominance. Now, its Democrats who are celebrating.
After the 2024 elections, the conventional wisdom suggested that Republicans had entered an era of electoral dominance.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-04-02T13:04:09.853Z
A lot can change in six months. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
After the 2024 elections, the conventional wisdom suggested that Republicans had entered an era of electoral dominance.
A lot can change in six months
A lot can change in six months
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/first-big-test-trumps-second-term-voters-tell-gop-didnt-want-hear-rcna199243
A few days later, voters in the Badger State rendered their verdict and it wasnt the one Musk and other Republicans wanted to hear. As my MSNBC colleague Clarissa-Jan Lim summarized overnight:
.....As the dust settles on the most important electoral tests of Trumps second term, weve learned a few things about the electoral landscape.
Musk wont save Republican candidates: The presidents top campaign donor spent millions in the hopes of pushing Schimel to victory in Wisconsin, and it backfired, with Democrats ultimately running against Musk, whom they accused of trying to buy the election. Theres a lesson here for GOP officials whove falsely assumed that Musk is popular with the American mainstream and whove operated from the assumption that the billionaire can help carry them across the finish line in 2026.
Democrats will be running against Musk a lot in the coming months: Trumps unpopularity matters, but Musks unpopularity runs deeper. If youre thinking the billionaire will be a centerpiece of Democratic messaging going forward, youre right.
Republicans in competitive districts have reason to worry: The GOP thought it could run the 2024 playbook in a battleground state that Trump narrowly won, counting on that recipe to keep working. It failed badly. Republicans representing districts that were highly competitive last year are now confronted with a choice: Ignore the prevailing winds, stick with their party and hope for the best, or start putting some distance between themselves and the GOP.
Trumps endorsements are of limited value: Once again, Trump told voters to turn out for an ally. Once again, it didnt matter. Theres no denying that the president has a loyal base, but to assume that base will necessarily rally behind his preferred candidates is a mistake.
Reassessing the Democratic brand: Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado told NBC News over the weekend that his partys brand is problematic. Around the same time, Californias Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, said the Democratic brand is toxic. Days earlier, Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania told Politico, If we dont get our s--- together, then we are going to be in a permanent minority.
......In the aftermath of Election Day 2024, the conventional wisdom suggested not only that Republicans had entered an era of electoral dominance, but also that Democratic voters were demoralized, disheartened and prepared to withdraw from civic life for a long while.
A lot has changed in six months.
Liberal candidate Susan Crawford has won the Wisconsin Supreme Court election, NBC News projected Tuesday, preserving a liberal majority on the swing states highest court. Crawford, a circuit court judge in Dane County, defeated Brad Schimel, a Waukesha County circuit court judge and former Republican state attorney general.
.....As the dust settles on the most important electoral tests of Trumps second term, weve learned a few things about the electoral landscape.
Musk wont save Republican candidates: The presidents top campaign donor spent millions in the hopes of pushing Schimel to victory in Wisconsin, and it backfired, with Democrats ultimately running against Musk, whom they accused of trying to buy the election. Theres a lesson here for GOP officials whove falsely assumed that Musk is popular with the American mainstream and whove operated from the assumption that the billionaire can help carry them across the finish line in 2026.
Democrats will be running against Musk a lot in the coming months: Trumps unpopularity matters, but Musks unpopularity runs deeper. If youre thinking the billionaire will be a centerpiece of Democratic messaging going forward, youre right.
Republicans in competitive districts have reason to worry: The GOP thought it could run the 2024 playbook in a battleground state that Trump narrowly won, counting on that recipe to keep working. It failed badly. Republicans representing districts that were highly competitive last year are now confronted with a choice: Ignore the prevailing winds, stick with their party and hope for the best, or start putting some distance between themselves and the GOP.
Trumps endorsements are of limited value: Once again, Trump told voters to turn out for an ally. Once again, it didnt matter. Theres no denying that the president has a loyal base, but to assume that base will necessarily rally behind his preferred candidates is a mistake.
Reassessing the Democratic brand: Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado told NBC News over the weekend that his partys brand is problematic. Around the same time, Californias Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, said the Democratic brand is toxic. Days earlier, Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania told Politico, If we dont get our s--- together, then we are going to be in a permanent minority.
......In the aftermath of Election Day 2024, the conventional wisdom suggested not only that Republicans had entered an era of electoral dominance, but also that Democratic voters were demoralized, disheartened and prepared to withdraw from civic life for a long while.
A lot has changed in six months.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MaddowBlog-In first big test of Trump's second term, voters tell GOP what it didn't want to hear (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 2025
OP
Bluetus
(2,280 posts)1. Economic unfairness
Maddow wrote:
Trumps unpopularity matters, but Musks unpopularity runs deeper. If youre thinking the billionaire will be a centerpiece of Democratic messaging going forward, youre right.
Let's hope so. If you look at Gallup "wrong track" polling
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1669/general-mood-country.aspx
it is obvious that something huge changed in 2005. Prior to that, the right/wrong track numbers swung between 30-70 like a pendulum. Since 2005, Americans have been solidly in the "wrong track" camp, and that is with two Republican and 2 Democratic Presidents.
What changed? That happens to be the moment when Bush tried to kill Social Security, turning it over to Wall Street. Since that time, most of the things angering Americans, all across the political spectrum, have been related to economic unfairness. This is the exporting of jobs, the concentration of wealth, the rollback of consumer protections, the runaway cost of college tuition, the runaway cost of health care, the privatization of public schools, and on and on.
Meanwhile, most Dems have been talking about everything BUT the economic issues. I hope Maddow is right. Musk is doing us a great favor. Americans have been in an "Eat The Rich" mood for 20 years, but Musk is putting a very punchable face on that. Every campaign strategy should start with a discussion about how to make sure their eat-the-rich message front and center. This is a gift from the gods. Democrats must not blow this one.
Wiz Imp
(8,915 posts)2. Maddowblog is written by Steve Benen, not Rachel Maddow
Last edited Wed Apr 2, 2025, 10:22 AM - Edit history (1)
Bluetus
(2,280 posts)3. Good point. It is CURATED by Steve Been
But it is part of Rachel's web presence and presumably represents her views.