Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING via Wash Post: Waltz & Staff Using Gmail For Military Communications

BREAKING via WaPo:
— MeidasTouch (@meidastouch.com) 2025-04-01T20:08:03.310Z
Mike Waltz and other members of Trump's National Security Council conducted government business over personal Gmail accounts, where they held conversations about highly sensitive information, including about military positions, powerful weapons systems, and more
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING via Wash Post: Waltz & Staff Using Gmail For Military Communications (Original Post)
MayReasonRule
Apr 2025
OP
C_U_L8R
(48,732 posts)1. And who else??
Everyone in the Trump cabinet. Audit them.
MayReasonRule
(3,995 posts)2. Hilary Has Entered The Chat...

JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)4. Let's see if the MSM covers this 24/7 like they did with Hillary.
bucolic_frolic
(53,675 posts)3. But their emails .......
The silence will be deafening.
And they learned this disregard for security from the boxes in MAL bathroom. From the man himself.
SheltieLover
(75,730 posts)5. Hillary's emails? Oh, come on!
LetMyPeopleVote
(173,920 posts)6. Waltz and staff used Gmail for government communications, officials say
âWaltz and staff used Gmail for government communications, officials say
— Jamie Gangel (@jamiegangel.bsky.social) 2025-04-01T19:25:02.969Z
Trumpâs national security adviser is trying to manage his way out of a crisis. But new revelations about his teamâs operational security are piling up in the inbox.â
www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
Link to tweet
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/04/01/waltz-national-security-council-signal-gmail/?pwapi_token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJyZWFzb24iOiJnaWZ0IiwibmJmIjoxNzQzNDgwMDAwLCJpc3MiOiJzdWJzY3JpcHRpb25zIiwiZXhwIjoxNzQ0ODYyMzk5LCJpYXQiOjE3NDM0ODAwMDAsImp0aSI6ImNjNmE3ZmYzLTViMWYtNDdjZi05YTcwLTJlZTdjY2YxOGE1YSIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lndhc2hpbmd0b25wb3N0LmNvbS9uYXRpb25hbC1zZWN1cml0eS8yMDI1LzA0LzAxL3dhbHR6LW5hdGlvbmFsLXNlY3VyaXR5LWNvdW5jaWwtc2lnbmFsLWdtYWlsLyJ9.B_oXWbANc-R7inHV48C9AqkmVIA-41Ip1IVrDyYc60Y
Members of President Donald Trumps National Security Council, including White House national security adviser Michael Waltz, have conducted government business over personal Gmail accounts, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post and interviews with three U.S. officials.
The use of Gmail, a far less secure method of communication than the encrypted messaging app Signal, is the latest example of questionable data security practices by top national security officials already under fire for the mistaken inclusion of a journalist in a group chat about high-level planning for military operations in Yemen.
A senior Waltz aide used the commercial email service for highly technical conversations with colleagues at other government agencies involving sensitive military positions and powerful weapons systems relating to an ongoing conflict, according to emails reviewed by The Post. While the NSC official used his Gmail account, his interagency colleagues used government-issued accounts, headers from the email correspondence show.......
Data security experts have expressed alarm that U.S. national security professionals are not more readily using the governments suite of secure encrypted systems for work communications such as JWICS, the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System.
Most concerning, however, is the use of personal email, which is widely acknowledged to be susceptible to hacking, spearfishing and other types of digital compromise.
Unless you are using GPG, email is not end-to-end encrypted, and the contents of a message can be intercepted and read at many points, including on Googles email servers, said Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
National security experts have expressed alarm over the administrations denial that the leaked Signal chat contained classified information.
The use of Gmail, a far less secure method of communication than the encrypted messaging app Signal, is the latest example of questionable data security practices by top national security officials already under fire for the mistaken inclusion of a journalist in a group chat about high-level planning for military operations in Yemen.
A senior Waltz aide used the commercial email service for highly technical conversations with colleagues at other government agencies involving sensitive military positions and powerful weapons systems relating to an ongoing conflict, according to emails reviewed by The Post. While the NSC official used his Gmail account, his interagency colleagues used government-issued accounts, headers from the email correspondence show.......
Data security experts have expressed alarm that U.S. national security professionals are not more readily using the governments suite of secure encrypted systems for work communications such as JWICS, the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System.
Most concerning, however, is the use of personal email, which is widely acknowledged to be susceptible to hacking, spearfishing and other types of digital compromise.
Unless you are using GPG, email is not end-to-end encrypted, and the contents of a message can be intercepted and read at many points, including on Googles email servers, said Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
National security experts have expressed alarm over the administrations denial that the leaked Signal chat contained classified information.