General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsprivately, there is a lot of concern about his (Pete Hegseth's)judgment
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/29/pete-hegseth-wife-jennifer-foreign-defense-official-meetingsRepublicans have largely defended Hegseth and have brushed off the group chat fiasco in public. But reports suggest that there are some who are privately concerned about Hegseth’s conduct.
“You’re not going to hear a huge public outcry,” an anonymous GOP official told Politico. “But privately, there is a lot of concern about his judgment.”

tanyev
(45,919 posts)
UTUSN
(73,677 posts)cbabe
(4,816 posts)BOSSHOG
(41,799 posts)IT WONT BE DONE PRIVATELY. Will the cowardly republicans with conservative values be privately concerned about that. Are you privately concerned about the spread of measles and Covid and how the end of FEMA might effect your district, or who will harvest produce from now on, or the calls you’ll get when Grandma doesn’t get her Social Security Check or when car dealerships go out of business due to Republican Tariffs. Just asking. Elections have consequences we’re told.
haele
(14,080 posts)Wouldn't be surprised if his information has been heavily edited before it gets to him.
Even the toady *rump put in charge of Joint Chiefs was somewhat qualified and wouldn't intentionally waste resources and manpower on stupid and petulant political adventures with the military.
Especially when it's increasingly obvious we're going to be standing alone if we do.
Irish_Dem
(67,214 posts)Response to Demovictory9 (Original post)
vapor2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
BoRaGard
(4,721 posts)than the republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief and former casino hustler.
So Heg's Seth has got that going against him...
spanone
(138,601 posts)Irish_Dem
(67,214 posts)UTUSN
(73,677 posts)yet somehow this one is trademark-Trump stunt meister - pushups, tattoos, incompetence - performing his main "qualification" of being a Fox host.
Demovictory9
(35,043 posts)Racial resentment, anti women in military
David__77
(23,954 posts)UTUSN
(73,677 posts)JoseBalow
(7,117 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(160,884 posts)As Pete Hegseth flails, there are apparently Pentagon insiders eager to talk about the defense secretary’s struggles.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3llopdxucnk2a
Hegseth's other problem: There appear to be Pentagon insiders who are willing to talk to reporters about his incompetence, failures, and abuses
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/allegations-hegseth-mount-pentagon-chief-faces-new-kind-problem-rcna198856
It’s common for the Defense Department and other federal agencies to have liaisons. Each military branch sends liaisons to Capitol Hill. The Pentagon, State Department and others all use interagency liaisons to more closely coordinate and keep tabs on policy. But it is not common for those senior-level positions to be filled by family members of the Cabinet heads....
Despite Hegseth’s apparent preoccupation with merit-based employment decisions, his younger brother received a position of influence at the Pentagon despite a background as the founder of a podcast production company.
Around the same time, The Wall Street Journal published another report about the defense secretary that raised eyebrows:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is facing scrutiny over his handling of details of a military strike, brought his wife, a former Fox News producer, to two meetings with foreign military counterparts where sensitive information was discussed, according to multiple people who were present or had knowledge of the discussions.
The Journal’s report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, added that a Defense secretary “can invite anyone to meetings with visiting counterparts, but attendee lists are usually carefully limited to those who need to be there and attendees are typically expected to possess security clearances given the delicate nature of the discussions.”....
The reporting from the AP and the Journal dovetailed with a Politico report that said while Donald Trump has expressed public support for Hegseth, “behind the scenes, administration insiders are starting to express doubts about the Pentagon chief’s judgment.” CNN had a related piece that said, “Interviews with multiple current and former national security officials this week, including career military and civilian officials, reflect growing concerns about Hegseth’s leadership at the Pentagon.”
Taken individually, the revelations about his brother’s job and his wife’s access are certainly important in their own right. But let’s not overlook the story behind the stories: It appears increasingly obvious that there are some people at the Pentagon who’ve learned some unfortunate things about Hegseth, and they’re suddenly eager to share that information with journalists.
Or put another way, two months into Hegseth’s tenure, he’s generating the kind of chatter that his respected and qualified predecessor didn’t have to worry about at the department he ostensibly leads.
It’s a problem for the Pentagon chief that there’s evidence of his incompetence, abuses and failures, but it’s just as notable a problem that there are DOD insiders who are apparently willing to talk to reporters about his incompetence, abuses and failures.