Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blm

(113,890 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:07 AM Yesterday

Former fact-checker at Facebook fact-checks Zuckerberg on his current lies.

Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2025, 02:22 PM - Edit history (1)

No, social-distancing measures were never part of a plan to “install Sharia law” during the coronavirus pandemic. Nor does Nancy Pelosi’s husband own Dominion Voting Systems, the election-software company whose product “glitched in favor of Biden” in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. And SpongeBob SquarePants’s pineapple under the sea, while prime Bikini Bottom real estate, is not, in fact, located on Little St. James, the private Caribbean island once owned by Jeffrey Epstein.

I came to the above conclusions after hours of painstaking research, from scouring the then House Speaker’s financial-disclosure reports to cross-referencing satellite images of Little St. James with the address on the fictional fry cook’s elusive boating license.

Between late 2019 and the spring of 2021, I was part of Facebook’s third-party fact-checking initiative, spending my first job out of Columbia Journalism School, and most of the pandemic, debunking viral claims that were seen and shared by thousands before they ever came across my desk.

Mark Zuckerberg, announcing the end of fact-checking at Meta this week, claimed that “fact-checkers have been too politically biased” and have “destroyed more trust than they created.” As a former fact-checker, I’d like to rule that statement as false, unless Zuckerberg sees the truth itself as “too politically biased.”

https://airmail.news/issues/2025-1-11/bare-facebook-liar

https://archive.li/bw54m

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former fact-checker at Facebook fact-checks Zuckerberg on his current lies. (Original Post) blm Yesterday OP
The end of fact-checking at Meta is a dream come true for conservatives, of course. J_William_Ryan Yesterday #1
Liberals are at liberty too. BonnieJW Yesterday #5
BlueSky DownriverDem Yesterday #8
Well, I like blue sky oldmanlynn Yesterday #13
Good. OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #2
Why not just post truthful stuff oldmanlynn Yesterday #15
Social media is like a piranha pool. OldBaldy1701E 21 hrs ago #23
support social media and news sources that hire fact checkers cadoman Yesterday #3
Getting rid of fact checkers was probably something he was already itching to do. paulkienitz Yesterday #4
ANYTHING that contradicts... GiqueCee Yesterday #6
Isn't "Fakebook" already in wide use as a pejorative ? eppur_se_muova Yesterday #7
The fact-checkers would have been fine in the eyes of moniss Yesterday #9
I hate zuckerberg ..... I wish he was GONE... Trueblue1968 Yesterday #10
may be time to finally ditch Facebook RussBLib Yesterday #11
Unless, of course, one never had it or used it in thefirst place. I didn't soldierant 22 hrs ago #22
I saw it as garbage immediately Skittles 20 hrs ago #24
This Fact-checker Gets It. DallasNE Yesterday #12
facts have a liberal bias Skittles 20 hrs ago #25
Age of the Oligarchs surfered Yesterday #14
The truth Puppyjive Yesterday #16
Link to the archived version of the article Ms. Toad Yesterday #17
Thank you for posting BoRaGard Yesterday #18
someone should start a new Meta 4catsmom Yesterday #19
Verify First would be a great name blm Yesterday #20
call the twins et tu 19 hrs ago #28
Yes indeed after all NPR tax support was cut because, conservatives claimed, "truth has a liberal bias." nt ShazamIam 23 hrs ago #21
This message was self-deleted by its author wcmagumba 20 hrs ago #26
I psoted a pic today of Melania on Facebook with her private blocked out and they removed the post! kimbutgar 20 hrs ago #27

J_William_Ryan

(2,307 posts)
1. The end of fact-checking at Meta is a dream come true for conservatives, of course.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:32 AM
Yesterday

Conservatives are now at liberty to spread all manner of disinformation and lies on social media, along with rightwing hate speech.

And as private entities social media are at liberty to do nothing at all about rightwing disinformation and lies.

Conservatives will continue their war on facts and the truth, neither of which are ‘political.’

BonnieJW

(2,628 posts)
5. Liberals are at liberty too.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 12:03 PM
Yesterday

It's a two way street. Magats can post all the lies they want, but then a dem can ask a magat when they stopped beating their wife.
Or, your new girlfriend goes to junior high with my daughter.

oldmanlynn

(530 posts)
13. Well, I like blue sky
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:26 PM
Yesterday

I don’t think it’s wise to go into a closet and just avoid all the conversations that are going on on the very large platforms

OldBaldy1701E

(6,793 posts)
2. Good.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:42 AM
Yesterday

Everyone needs to start posting bogus crap on the platform. LOTS of it. Anything and everything. Make it so worthless to anyone that it will finally die and release the majority of this planet from their addiction.

oldmanlynn

(530 posts)
15. Why not just post truthful stuff
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:35 PM
Yesterday

Contradict these people with truth posts. I think it is on us to know what the real facts are and encounter those people in large large volume numbers.

OldBaldy1701E

(6,793 posts)
23. Social media is like a piranha pool.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 07:39 PM
21 hrs ago

You can throw in a piece of wood and a few might nibble on it for a bit.

You toss in some red meat and watch what happens.

The truth is of no interest to those people. Sensational conjecture is what gets clicks. Clicks are what get you the ability to be heard in the pool. Clicks can even make it seem like you are in charge of the pool. Until the pool turns on you. Which it always seems willing to do.

The pool needs to be filled in. Regardless of its uses in the beginning, it is now just too fetid and serves little purpose other than to sew discontent and falsehoods.

But, that is just my opinion. It also serves little purpose.

cadoman

(1,009 posts)
3. support social media and news sources that hire fact checkers
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 11:44 AM
Yesterday

Decline to pay for companies that refuse to use them. Vote with your dollars.

There are more of us than them and they will eventually feel it in their pocket books and have to bring back fact checking.

GiqueCee

(1,579 posts)
6. ANYTHING that contradicts...
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 12:15 PM
Yesterday

... a conservative's fabrications is "too politically biased". Just ask the WInklevoss twins.

eppur_se_muova

(37,850 posts)
7. Isn't "Fakebook" already in wide use as a pejorative ?
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 12:16 PM
Yesterday

I've been using "Cessbook" for a long time. I'm not sure what it will deserve next, but I'm running out of sufficiently pejorative nicknames.

moniss

(6,243 posts)
9. The fact-checkers would have been fine in the eyes of
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:10 PM
Yesterday

the Nearly Human In Appearance One Known As Zuckerberg if they had been biased towards fascism.

RussBLib

(9,741 posts)
11. may be time to finally ditch Facebook
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:16 PM
Yesterday

...there is already lots of garbage on there, but the future looks even worse than the present. I've moved to Bluesky but still struggle with the interface.

https://russblib.blogspot.com

DallasNE

(7,615 posts)
12. This Fact-checker Gets It.
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:18 PM
Yesterday

“fact-checkers have been too politically biased” and have “destroyed more trust than they created.” As a former fact-checker, I’d like to rule that statement as false, unless Zuckerberg sees the truth itself as “too politically biased.”

This also points out the flaws Zuck had built into his scheme, which was somewhat upside down. The policy prohibited fact-checking politicians when they were the very people who most needed to be fact-checked. So Zuck's solution is to take a very flawed system and make it worse. This will likely have some serious unintended consequences for Zuck's pocketbook, as it should.

Skittles

(160,683 posts)
25. facts have a liberal bias
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 08:26 PM
20 hrs ago

that's what bothers conservatives so much

harder to manipulate the idiot base if they cannot chronically LIE

Puppyjive

(617 posts)
16. The truth
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 01:54 PM
Yesterday

What is the truth? Is it a fact? A fact withstands the test of time. Facts are not political. Propaganda distorts the truth. It's a shame.

4catsmom

(345 posts)
19. someone should start a new Meta
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:20 PM
Yesterday

like they did with Blue sky. A site where any stated fact has to be verified. (might be a good name and a dig at TSF's 'truth social')
I'm not tech savvy enough though.

ShazamIam

(2,731 posts)
21. Yes indeed after all NPR tax support was cut because, conservatives claimed, "truth has a liberal bias." nt
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 05:12 PM
23 hrs ago

Response to blm (Original post)

kimbutgar

(23,777 posts)
27. I psoted a pic today of Melania on Facebook with her private blocked out and they removed the post!
Sat Jan 11, 2025, 09:05 PM
20 hrs ago

I purposely did it to see if it would be moderated! They removed because of nudity but there was no bush and her boobs were covered!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former fact-checker at Fa...