General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFormer fact-checker at Facebook fact-checks Zuckerberg on his current lies.
Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2025, 03:22 PM - Edit history (1)
No, social-distancing measures were never part of a plan to “install Sharia law” during the coronavirus pandemic. Nor does Nancy Pelosi’s husband own Dominion Voting Systems, the election-software company whose product “glitched in favor of Biden” in the wake of the 2020 presidential election. And SpongeBob SquarePants’s pineapple under the sea, while prime Bikini Bottom real estate, is not, in fact, located on Little St. James, the private Caribbean island once owned by Jeffrey Epstein.
I came to the above conclusions after hours of painstaking research, from scouring the then House Speaker’s financial-disclosure reports to cross-referencing satellite images of Little St. James with the address on the fictional fry cook’s elusive boating license.
Between late 2019 and the spring of 2021, I was part of Facebook’s third-party fact-checking initiative, spending my first job out of Columbia Journalism School, and most of the pandemic, debunking viral claims that were seen and shared by thousands before they ever came across my desk.
Mark Zuckerberg, announcing the end of fact-checking at Meta this week, claimed that “fact-checkers have been too politically biased” and have “destroyed more trust than they created.” As a former fact-checker, I’d like to rule that statement as false, unless Zuckerberg sees the truth itself as “too politically biased.”
https://airmail.news/issues/2025-1-11/bare-facebook-liar
https://archive.li/bw54m

J_William_Ryan
(2,634 posts)Conservatives are now at liberty to spread all manner of disinformation and lies on social media, along with rightwing hate speech.
And as private entities social media are at liberty to do nothing at all about rightwing disinformation and lies.
Conservatives will continue their war on facts and the truth, neither of which are ‘political.’
BonnieJW
(2,855 posts)It's a two way street. Magats can post all the lies they want, but then a dem can ask a magat when they stopped beating their wife.
Or, your new girlfriend goes to junior high with my daughter.
DownriverDem
(6,799 posts)is the place to be.
oldmanlynn
(638 posts)I don’t think it’s wise to go into a closet and just avoid all the conversations that are going on on the very large platforms
OldBaldy1701E
(7,653 posts)Everyone needs to start posting bogus crap on the platform. LOTS of it. Anything and everything. Make it so worthless to anyone that it will finally die and release the majority of this planet from their addiction.
oldmanlynn
(638 posts)Contradict these people with truth posts. I think it is on us to know what the real facts are and encounter those people in large large volume numbers.
OldBaldy1701E
(7,653 posts)You can throw in a piece of wood and a few might nibble on it for a bit.
You toss in some red meat and watch what happens.
The truth is of no interest to those people. Sensational conjecture is what gets clicks. Clicks are what get you the ability to be heard in the pool. Clicks can even make it seem like you are in charge of the pool. Until the pool turns on you. Which it always seems willing to do.
The pool needs to be filled in. Regardless of its uses in the beginning, it is now just too fetid and serves little purpose other than to sew discontent and falsehoods.
But, that is just my opinion. It also serves little purpose.
cadoman
(1,196 posts)Decline to pay for companies that refuse to use them. Vote with your dollars.
There are more of us than them and they will eventually feel it in their pocket books and have to bring back fact checking.
paulkienitz
(1,402 posts)GiqueCee
(2,120 posts)... a conservative's fabrications is "too politically biased". Just ask the WInklevoss twins.
eppur_se_muova
(38,829 posts)I've been using "Cessbook" for a long time. I'm not sure what it will deserve next, but I'm running out of sufficiently pejorative nicknames.
moniss
(7,008 posts)the Nearly Human In Appearance One Known As Zuckerberg if they had been biased towards fascism.
Trueblue1968
(18,454 posts)That is all I view can say.
RussBLib
(9,862 posts)...there is already lots of garbage on there, but the future looks even worse than the present. I've moved to Bluesky but still struggle with the interface.
https://russblib.blogspot.com
soldierant
(8,363 posts)Skittles
(163,311 posts)yes indeed
DallasNE
(7,747 posts)“fact-checkers have been too politically biased” and have “destroyed more trust than they created.” As a former fact-checker, I’d like to rule that statement as false, unless Zuckerberg sees the truth itself as “too politically biased.”
This also points out the flaws Zuck had built into his scheme, which was somewhat upside down. The policy prohibited fact-checking politicians when they were the very people who most needed to be fact-checked. So Zuck's solution is to take a very flawed system and make it worse. This will likely have some serious unintended consequences for Zuck's pocketbook, as it should.
Skittles
(163,311 posts)that's what bothers conservatives so much
harder to manipulate the idiot base if they cannot chronically LIE
surfered
(6,071 posts)Puppyjive
(685 posts)What is the truth? Is it a fact? A fact withstands the test of time. Facts are not political. Propaganda distorts the truth. It's a shame.
Ms. Toad
(36,585 posts)BoRaGard
(4,933 posts)
4catsmom
(633 posts)like they did with Blue sky. A site where any stated fact has to be verified. (might be a good name and a dig at TSF's 'truth social')
I'm not tech savvy enough though.
blm
(114,047 posts)they might be up for it lol
ShazamIam
(2,824 posts)Response to blm (Original post)
wcmagumba This message was self-deleted by its author.
kimbutgar
(24,794 posts)I purposely did it to see if it would be moderated! They removed because of nudity but there was no bush and her boobs were covered!