Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PedroXimenez

(644 posts)
Fri Jan 10, 2025, 08:25 PM Jan 10

Losing your home is hell, but so is being unhoused in a wildfire (Mother Jones article)

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/01/los-angeles-fires-unhoused-homelessness-crisis/

The ongoing Los Angeles wildfires have reportedly killed at least 5 people and destroyed thousands of structures, leaving entire neighborhoods in heaps of ashes.

With stately homes burned to the ground, or too damaged to imminently return to, wealthy Angelenos reportedly fled to hotels or other cities: Those who could afford the nightly rate of more than $1,000 stayed at the posh Beverly Hills Hotel, according to a Wednesday night dispatch from the LA Times. Others, the New York Times reported, went to the Sunset Tower Hotel in West Hollywood, where Thursday night’s cheapest rate was listed online at $512. Some drove the 30 miles southeast to the city of Anaheim, where several hotels are offering discounted stays.

But the plight of people experiencing homelessness in the city—reportedly more than 45,000 as of last year, which marked a decrease from 2023—have been comparatively invisible in the wall-to-wall coverage. On Thursday afternoon, I called up John Maceri, the CEO of the People Concern, a social services organization in LA that oversees 700 shelter beds, to learn more about the barriers facing unhoused people trying to flee the wildfires. Their struggles, he said, range from lacking cell phones and Internet access, which can prevent them from learning about evacuation orders and resources, to coping with health issues from all the time spent outside inhaling wildfire smoke. With homelessness reaching record levels in the US last year and natural disasters increasing as a result of climate change, the challenges Maceri outlined seem less like anomalous hardships and more like harbingers of what’s to come as more Americans grapple with the dual housing and climate crises.

This interview has been lightly condensed and edited for clarity.


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Losing your home is hell, but so is being unhoused in a wildfire (Mother Jones article) (Original Post) PedroXimenez Jan 10 OP
NPR Language EquityQueen Jan 10 #1
i heard that, i saw it as a deliberate distraction PedroXimenez Jan 10 #2
 

EquityQueen

(11 posts)
1. NPR Language
Fri Jan 10, 2025, 08:36 PM
Jan 10

Democrat strategist James Carville has been telling other Democrats to stop using "NPR language". What do you think about that? The fist thing I see in this article is the word "unhoused". What if they had just said "homeless"? I don't like the word "unhoused" because it positions the speaker as some sort of elite who is in charge of divvying up houses to people, and for some reason you haven't given one to everybody. I think that's self serving and demeaning to the homeless person, who probably doesn't have a house because the whole economic system is corrupt and either let him fall through or perhaps even made him fall through. The solution isn't to give you more power. Who are you to say that he needed a handout? It feels like you're trying to excuse the perpetrators that got us here. It's also not something anyone can relate to. It's cold sterile language. Homeless. I can relate to that. I hear that word and I can feel it. It would be horrible to be homeless. Unhoused? Okay I will wait for the paper work to be sorted out so I can receive my new classification of "housed". Give me a break.

PedroXimenez

(644 posts)
2. i heard that, i saw it as a deliberate distraction
Fri Jan 10, 2025, 09:40 PM
Jan 10

sometimes semantics is worth thinking about, but when i hear people like Carville talk about it i see it as them wanting to change the conversation from something he doesn't want to talk about, that can actually change things, to something that doesn't do us any good but keeps our minds occupied.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Losing your home is hell,...