Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm looking forward to reading Justice Sotomayor's ruling denying Trump a pause (Original Post) Quiet Em Thursday OP
It was the highest court in New York that denied trDUMP, magicarpet Thursday #1
That's it for state courts Sundance1220 Thursday #2
The con artist appealed to the Supreme Court as well. Quiet Em Thursday #3
NY tintinvotes Thursday #4
She should have been but Trump's lawyers sent the request to ALL members of the court, so no. hlthe2b Thursday #5
Yes. Quiet Em Thursday #6

magicarpet

(17,224 posts)
1. It was the highest court in New York that denied trDUMP,
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 11:16 AM
Thursday

not Justice Sotomayor. That is what just happened this morning, correct ?

New York's highest court won't stop Trump's sentencing as prosecutors urge Supreme Court to stay out of fight
By Graham Kates

Updated on: January 9, 2025 / 10:22 AM EST / CBS News

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/new-yorks-highest-court-declines-to-step-in-to-stop-trumps-sentencing/#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17364389617657&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com

tintinvotes

(48 posts)
4. NY
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 11:21 AM
Thursday

I think she is the justice in charge of taking appeals from the NY area which means she will decide if Rump's case makes it to the Supreme Court.

hlthe2b

(107,169 posts)
5. She should have been but Trump's lawyers sent the request to ALL members of the court, so no.
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 11:54 AM
Thursday

And, I'd ask that none of us get ahead of ourselves. If SCOTUS followed 249 years of principles and precedence, they would refuse without comment or at least deny immediately. But, this is a corrupted version of a SCOTUS--no better than that which decided Dred Scott v Sanford.. or Plessy v Ferguson...Bush v Gore...Citizens United v FEC...Trump v United States (immunity)...

We shall see... but don't take it for granted that the law actually matters to the six MAGATs on that court.

Quiet Em

(1,350 posts)
6. Yes.
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 12:14 PM
Thursday

Here is the latest update

Prosecutors on Thursday urged the Supreme Court to allow Donald Trump’s sentencing in his New York hush money case to go ahead as scheduled on Friday morning. Emphasizing that Trump’s conviction rests on conduct for which he is not entitled to immunity, that Trump can attend Friday’s hearing “by video at the trial court’s invitation to minimize any burden,” and that Trump can appeal after he is sentenced, prosecutors wrote in a 38-page filing that there is no reason for the justices to take “the extraordinary step of intervening” now.

The filing came one day after Trump asked the justices to block the sentencing. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, instructed the state to respond to Trump’s request by 10 a.m. on Thursday, signaling that the court is likely to act quickly.


https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/new-york-prosecutors-tell-justices-to-let-trump-be-sentenced/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm looking forward to re...