Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Tons of evidence we've never seen': Legal expert predicts footnotes in Jack Smith report
trump is really scared of the facts in this report
Link to tweet
https://www.rawstory.com/jack-smith-report/
Special counsel Jack Smith's final report has been handed off to Attorney General Merrick Garland, leading to speculation about the level of detail in its pages.
MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin noted Tuesday that Donald Trump's team had seen the report, which led the lawyers of his co-defendants to press for censorship. The judge, Aileen Cannon, later declared that it would not be released.
Rubin said that the two-volume report likely won't have much unknown information. "But what there might be that we haven't seen is documentation and evidence for the facts as we understand them."
"If that's what's in these reports, then possibly what they are fighting against is substantiation of things they've always claimed never happened. Extra details," she added.
Those might not be included in the report as a whole, but they could appear in pieces sprinkled throughout, she said.
MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin noted Tuesday that Donald Trump's team had seen the report, which led the lawyers of his co-defendants to press for censorship. The judge, Aileen Cannon, later declared that it would not be released.
Rubin said that the two-volume report likely won't have much unknown information. "But what there might be that we haven't seen is documentation and evidence for the facts as we understand them."
"If that's what's in these reports, then possibly what they are fighting against is substantiation of things they've always claimed never happened. Extra details," she added.
Those might not be included in the report as a whole, but they could appear in pieces sprinkled throughout, she said.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Tons of evidence we've never seen': Legal expert predicts footnotes in Jack Smith report (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
OP
republianmushroom
(18,402 posts)1. If we ever get to see it un-redacted.
Don't bet on seeing it.
chicoescuela
(1,720 posts)2. Agreed
Our only hope is Joe going rogue
electric_blue68
(19,153 posts)3. Or some brave folk sneak it out, and release!
Where is the current Daniel Ellsberg(s)!
chicoescuela
(1,720 posts)4. Better leak it while they can still get a pardon from Joe
electric_blue68
(19,153 posts)5. Indeed!