General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMore Americans Get Their News From YouTube -- and There's No Going Back
More Americans Get Their News From YouTube -- and There's No Going Back
Source: The Hollywood Reporter-By Shirley Halperin December 19, 2024 1:18pm
It was around Labor Day when I officially swore off network news. Election fatigue played a role in disconnecting, to be sure, but Id also found an alternative: YouTube pundits who spend hours live on their channels dissecting the top water-cooler stories of the day and exploring every possible angle. They have names like Akademiks and Kempire, who specialize in hip-hop and pop culture; Emily D. Baker and the Florida Law Man, who break down legal headlines and filings; and titles like Popcorned Planet, Legal AF, The Art of Dialogue and, my personal favorite, Tisa Tells.
As it turns out, Im not the only one who has made the switch from broadcast and cable news to YouTube a recent Pew Research Center study found that 54 percent of U.S. adults now get at least some of their information from YouTube newscasters, 25 percent of them on a regular basis (especially, curiously, women, who make up 57 percent of the YouTube news audience).
If you happen to be on the other side of those percentages and havent yet watched one of these shows, they have nothing like the slickly produced anchor chair- and roundtable-filled sets of CNN, MSNBC or Fox. Most hosts are operating with little more than their built-in computer camera and a ring light. There is no producer to speak of, and certainly not a teleprompter. Much of the time, these MCs are providing analysis in real time, sourcing their information from across social media and the internet and relying on their audience to fill in the blanks.
...Of course, theres no department of standards and practices for these broadcasters or, for that matter, a long-standing tradition of journalistic ethics. YouTube does have strict community guidelines, although seasoned hosts know how to evade algorithmic censors (which is why they often speak in what seems like code, referring to, say, PDF files instead of using a red-flag word like pedophiles). As for vetting you know, whether or not the news theyre putting out in the world is true Tisa, for one, says her sources are as good as they come, and she attempts to independently verify each claim with five different methods, including public filings.
Read more: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/americans-news-youtube-pundits-1236087369/
SWBTATTReg
(24,332 posts)Nice to be able to pick and choose YOUR news.
Fullduplexxx
(8,364 posts)rog
(754 posts)... I make a point NOT to click on these links.
Furthermore ... and I know I'm sounding like an old fogy here ... in the early days of DU, there was a community of respected users, such as Will Pitt, Khephra, and many others, who actually created intelligent, insightful, long form content, which I always looked forward to reading, rather than posting youtube, x/itter, etc, etc links, often without any context other than BOMBSHELL!!11!!!!1!!111
bucolic_frolic
(47,572 posts)it seems to me that some right of center channels - many financial ones for example - make an effort to be factual. They are not mere propaganda outlets. Now understand I don't watch Newsmax or any of those, I go for useful information. I think these channels see a need for ballast and connection to truth. That is progress.