Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSince it's fair to assume almost all of Drumpf's appointment picks are based on bribes..
isn't there some sort of evidence trail that could be used to prosecute him for government-by-bribe?
I mean it's not like he knows anything about the government agencies he's appointing people to head, or the countries he's giving ambassadorships to. Someone has to be screening all the requests to submit bids/bribes to get positions they want. I don't believe anyone on the Drumpf team is researching who is best qualified for any of these positions but I would venture there is a team screening/soliciting bribe bids.
OK those are my crazy thoughts. I'm ready to be corrected and informed.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Since it's fair to assume almost all of Drumpf's appointment picks are based on bribes.. (Original Post)
Stardust Mirror
Monday
OP
RockRaven
(16,528 posts)1. The Roberts Court/SCOTUS says bribes are cool and fine and good.
Especially when given to Republicans, but also in the general case.
Irish_Dem
(59,687 posts)2. Supreme Court gave him immunity and they think bribes are wonderful.
Irish_Dem
(59,687 posts)3. Yes it is pay for play right now. Trump is making good money selling positions in his administration.