Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlterNet: 'A fiasco by any measure': Wall Street Journal turns on Trump over budget 'blundering'
AlterNet - 'A fiasco by any measure': Wall Street Journal turns on Trump over budget 'blundering'
Tom Boggioni and Raw Story
December 22, 2024
Following a last-minute deal in the House which kept the government running until March, the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal placed the blame for the House budget chaos on Donald Trump and not House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) who was undercut at every turn by the president-elect.
In a scorching editorial, the editors got right to the point and asserted that Trump's reliance on billionaire Elon Musk as an advisor is a bad omen for how he will run the country after being sworn in on January 20.
Claiming "There are bad omens here for 2025 and the ability of Republicans to govern," the editors declared, "The immediate result has been a fiasco by any measure. Mr. Musk, and then Mr. Trump, delivered a social-media barrage against Mr. Johnsons continuing resolution to fund the government through March 14."
Needling Trump by pointing out, "Democrats are chortling about 'President Musk,' which cant sit well with the President-elect," the editors took aim at Musk's ignorance about how Congress operates.
"This is how Congress works, and for all Mr. Musks brilliance, he hasnt figured that out. Hes also supposed to be a math whiz, so he can probably count to 218, the votes needed for a House majority when everyone is present. Memorize it," they wrote before adding, "In 2017 Republicans had a large majority and experienced hands with policy chops like Paul Ryan and Kevin Brady. They had an outline for tax reform that they had spent years socializing among Members. Todays House GOP has little such institutional or policy memory, and its majority is small and divided. Its majority will probably be 219-215 when Republicans take over in January. Bullying Members will have a short shelf-life if it works at all."
/snip
Tom Boggioni and Raw Story
December 22, 2024
Following a last-minute deal in the House which kept the government running until March, the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal placed the blame for the House budget chaos on Donald Trump and not House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) who was undercut at every turn by the president-elect.
In a scorching editorial, the editors got right to the point and asserted that Trump's reliance on billionaire Elon Musk as an advisor is a bad omen for how he will run the country after being sworn in on January 20.
Claiming "There are bad omens here for 2025 and the ability of Republicans to govern," the editors declared, "The immediate result has been a fiasco by any measure. Mr. Musk, and then Mr. Trump, delivered a social-media barrage against Mr. Johnsons continuing resolution to fund the government through March 14."
Needling Trump by pointing out, "Democrats are chortling about 'President Musk,' which cant sit well with the President-elect," the editors took aim at Musk's ignorance about how Congress operates.
"This is how Congress works, and for all Mr. Musks brilliance, he hasnt figured that out. Hes also supposed to be a math whiz, so he can probably count to 218, the votes needed for a House majority when everyone is present. Memorize it," they wrote before adding, "In 2017 Republicans had a large majority and experienced hands with policy chops like Paul Ryan and Kevin Brady. They had an outline for tax reform that they had spent years socializing among Members. Todays House GOP has little such institutional or policy memory, and its majority is small and divided. Its majority will probably be 219-215 when Republicans take over in January. Bullying Members will have a short shelf-life if it works at all."
/snip
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AlterNet: 'A fiasco by any measure': Wall Street Journal turns on Trump over budget 'blundering' (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Sunday
OP
So they are waking up to the fact that the conman and his crew have no idea how to deliver on their promises?
Midnight Writer
Sunday
#2
Well they did pass the biggest tax cut for the wealthy the country's ever seen.
bluesbassman
Sunday
#5
2naSalit
(93,441 posts)1. Just as...
pendjo45 is no genius, leon is not brilliant.
Midnight Writer
(23,126 posts)2. So they are waking up to the fact that the conman and his crew have no idea how to deliver on their promises?
Isn't that special?
tanyev
(44,733 posts)3. It's like the WSJ has completely forgotten the four previous years of blundering,
incompetence and ineptitude. Why are they surprised?
Oh, and what did they actually accomplish with Paul Ryan and Kevin Brady? Ryan bailed after two years of dealing with Trump.
bluesbassman
(19,902 posts)5. Well they did pass the biggest tax cut for the wealthy the country's ever seen.
But other than that they were pretty much useless.
dutch777
(3,585 posts)4. Totally predictable. Suck it WSJ and all you business types that enabled this.
doc03
(36,957 posts)6. I saw two articles on Yahoo this morning blaming Biden for the
Republican's shit show on the budget. One from Politico and one from The Hill, both using the
a same headline that "Biden was AWOL" on the budget fight. It's like both were written in Mara Lardo.
dweller
(25,243 posts)7. THE FAKE AND FAILING WALL STREET URINAL , WHO BY THE WAY NEED TO RECOGNIZE
THAT I , ME , MYSELF AM THE PRESIDENT AND NOT ANYONELON ELSE
blah blah blah incoming
✌🏻